Latvia - 1. LigaOC Rēzekne Mākslīgais LaukumsData current as of 23 July 2026

Rēzekne / BJSS vs Riga FC II: match statistics

Rēzekne / BJSS crest
Rēzekne / BJSS
1 : 3half-time 1:0
Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II

Rēzekne / BJSS vs Riga FC II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rēzekne / BJSS play Riga FC II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 23 May 2026 at 14:00. Venue: OC Rēzekne Mākslīgais Laukums. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Rēzekne / BJSS: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Riga FC II: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rēzekne / BJSS scores 0.77 and concedes 2.85 goals per match. Riga FC II scores 1.62 and concedes 1.77. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rēzekne / BJSS 54%, Riga FC II 62%. Over 2.5: Rēzekne / BJSS 69%, Riga FC II 69%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Riga FC II has higher xG: 1.36 vs 0.74. Rēzekne / BJSS: 3.2 shots per match, Riga FC II: 8.2.

Match halves

Rēzekne / BJSS: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.46. Riga FC II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Rēzekne / BJSS: 46-60 (3 goals). Riga FC II: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Rēzekne / BJSS sit 14th with a season record of 0 wins, 1 draw and 7 losses and a goal tally of 5–27, while Riga FC II are 10th with a 2–1–5 record and 11–19 goals. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 4 and conceded 15, averaging 0.2 points per game, whereas the visitors have scored 8 and conceded 13, recording 0.8 points per game. At home Rēzekne concedes on average 3.5 goals per game (xG against 2.32), while Riga concede 2.25 on the road (xG against 1.85), giving the visitors a clear defensive advantage. Both teams have similar attacking expectations (xG 1.02 vs 1.09) and average about 1 goal per game, but Rēzekne have a higher home conversion rate of 17% versus 13% for the visitors, which does not offset their large number of goals conceded. Considering the visitors’ better defensive metrics, higher goal output over the last five matches and superior PPG over the last 5 (0.8 vs 0.2), I predict a Riga FC II win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
-1Shots-1
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
-1Shots on target-1
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
0xG0
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
-1Corners-1
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
0Dangerous attacks0
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
-1Fouls-1
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
-1Cards-1
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
0.77Goals scored / match1.62
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
2.85Goals conceded / match1.77
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
31%Average possession45%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
1.62Shots on target / match4.62
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.23Shots per match8.23
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
1.62Shots on target4.62
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
23.8%Shot conversion19.6%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
31%Possession45%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
0.74xG for1.36
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
2.31xG against1.68
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

Shooting quality

Rēzekne / BJSS: Counter-attackingRiga FC II: Counter-attacking
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
Accuracy (shots on target)50%56%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.230.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga FC II is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 2.4 pts / match - Riga FC II

Rēzekne / BJSS
WLLDL
Season result split
8% W15% R77% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-10
0.38 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Riga FC II
LWWWW
Season result split
46% W8% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-6
1.46 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 0.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga FC II is 110% better for: goals scored per match.

0.77 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.62 goals / match - Riga FC II

Riga FC II is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.85 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.77 goals / match - Riga FC II

Rēzekne / BJSS scoring profile: strong

Rēzekne / BJSS scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Rēzekne / BJSS keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 13 matches).

10Goals scored (season)21
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
37Goals conceded (season)23
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
3.62Average goals in match3.38
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
5Goals scored (last 5)10
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
10Goals conceded (last 5)4
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

How often they score at least...

54%1 goal77%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
23%2 goals62%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
0%3 goals15%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
0%4 goals8%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal85%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
69%2 goals62%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
54%3 goals23%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
38%4 goals8%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time38%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
15%Scored in both halves38%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
60%BTTS - last 560%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time31%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
46%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 185% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.54 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.54 pts / match - Riga FC II

Rēzekne / BJSS - half-time state
8% leading31% draw62% trailing
Riga FC II - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.54Points per match (1st half)1.54
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
0.23Goals scored (1st half)0.92
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.54
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
31%Clean sheet before half-time46%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
77%No goal before half-time38%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.77Points per match (2nd half)1.15
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
0.46Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
1.54Goals conceded (2nd half)1.15
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
2Average goals (2nd half)1.85
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
31%Clean sheet after half-time46%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II
62%No goal after half-time46%
Rēzekne / BJSSRiga FC II

Rēzekne / BJSS - second-half results

15% W31% R54% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Riga FC II - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
20
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Rēzekne / BJSS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rēzekne / BJSS
ScoredConceded
2
12
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
3
4
46-60
1
8
61-75
2
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.51
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rēzekne / BJSS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
42%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
178%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Rēzekne / BJSSLigaRiga FC II
Average goals in match 3.623.43 3.38
Both teams scored 54%60% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%68% 69%
Clean sheets 0%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 77%
Goal after half-time 77%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Rēzekne / BJSS 2 - 0 - 0 Riga FC II. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FK Rēzekne FA / BJSS
3 : 2
Riga FC II
Riga FC II
2 : 3
FK Rēzekne FA / BJSS

FAQ

What was the result of Rēzekne / BJSS vs Riga FC II?

The 1. Liga match finished Rēzekne / BJSS 1:3 Riga FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rēzekne / BJSS and Riga FC II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rēzekne / BJSS won 2, Riga FC II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rēzekne / BJSS vs Riga FC II?

Rēzekne / BJSS score 0.77 goals per game on average and Riga FC II 1.62. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Rēzekne / BJSS's matches and 62% of Riga FC II's.

What form are Rēzekne / BJSS and Riga FC II in?

Over the last 5 games Rēzekne / BJSS have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Riga FC II 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Riga FC II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.