Rēzekne / BJSS vs Riga FC II: match statistics
Rēzekne / BJSS vs Riga FC II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rēzekne / BJSS played Riga FC II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 23 May 2026. Venue: OC Rēzekne Mākslīgais Laukums. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Rēzekne / BJSS: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Riga FC II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rēzekne / BJSS scores 0.63 and concedes 3.38 goals per match. Riga FC II scores 1.38 and concedes 2.38. League average: 3.45 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rēzekne / BJSS 50%, Riga FC II 63%. Over 2.5: Rēzekne / BJSS 75%, Riga FC II 75%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 69%.
xG, shots and style
Riga FC II has higher xG: 1.25 vs 0.63. Rēzekne / BJSS: 2.5 shots per match, Riga FC II: 8.8.
Match halves
Rēzekne / BJSS: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.38. Riga FC II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Rēzekne / BJSS: 46-60 (2 goals). Riga FC II: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.45 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 69%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rēzekne / BJSS sit 14th with a season record of 0 wins, 1 draw and 7 losses and a goal tally of 5–27, while Riga FC II are 10th with a 2–1–5 record and 11–19 goals. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 4 and conceded 15, averaging 0.2 points per game, whereas the visitors have scored 8 and conceded 13, recording 0.8 points per game. At home Rēzekne concedes on average 3.5 goals per game (xG against 2.32), while Riga concede 2.25 on the road (xG against 1.85), giving the visitors a clear defensive advantage. Both teams have similar attacking expectations (xG 1.02 vs 1.09) and average about 1 goal per game, but Rēzekne have a higher home conversion rate of 17% versus 13% for the visitors, which does not offset their large number of goals conceded. Considering the visitors’ better defensive metrics, higher goal output over the last five matches and superior PPG over the last 5 (0.8 vs 0.2), I predict a Riga FC II win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data strongly supports BTTS - Yes: Rēzekne averages 1.75 goals scored and concedes 2.50 per match, while Riga FC II scores 1.00 and concedes 2.25; seasonal BTTS rates are 75% and 50% respectively, versus a league BTTS average of 59%. Both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, and in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred 60% for each side, indicating a marked tendency to both score and concede. Rēzekne creates more chances (10.0 shots and 6.25 shots on target on average, xG 1.41) than Riga II (7.5 shots, 3.5 on target, xG 1.09), so both sides have realistic scoring opportunities. Additionally, in the last 5 matches the home side conceded 3.0 goals on average, the away side 2.6, and the league average is 3.43 goals per match; 100% of Rēzekne’s matches exceeded 2.5 goals, which increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Considering 0% clean sheets, seasonal BTTS 75% vs 50% and high average concessions of 2.5 and 2.25, I assess BTTS as the dominant scenario (75% vs 25%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect an open game with a combined expected total of around 3.20 goals: 1.63 for Rēzekne / BJSS and 1.57 for Riga FC II. Hosts average 1.75 goals scored and concede 2.5 per match (27 conceded this season), while visitors score 1.0 and concede 2.25; in the last 5 matches hosts conceded on average 3.0 goals and visitors 2.6, indicating weak defenses. xG confirms the pressure: hosts' attacking xG is 1.41 versus visitors' defensive xG-against of 1.85, and visitors' attacking xG is 1.09 versus hosts' xG-against of 2.06. Season metrics show 100% of matches over 1.5 goals for both teams and 100% over 2.5 for the hosts and 50% for the visitors, while the hosts have 75% of games with both teams to score. Given the expected 3.20 goals and strong indicators (100% over 1.5 and high concession averages), the strongest signal is a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select 1/1 (home team leading at half-time and winning) as the most likely scenario. The home team leads at the break in 50% of their matches and scores on average 1.5 goals by half-time, while Riga FC II averages only 0.5 goals by half-time and leads in just 25% of games. Over the full match the home side has a seasonal goals-per-game average of 1.75 versus 1.0 for the visitors and a 50% win rate this season, whereas the away team has a 0% win rate and averages only 0.25 points per game, which favors a home victory. It should be noted, however, that the hosts concede an average of 2.0 goals after the break and have a negative second-half goal differential (-7), so there is a real risk of a turnaround by the visitors and thus the 1/X scenario also carries significant probability. Still, the higher xG for the home team (1.41 versus 1.09), greater number of shots on target (6.25 versus 3.5) and better shot conversion rate (18% versus 13%) increase the likelihood that the hosts will maintain their lead to the end, making 1/1 the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rēzekne / BJSS | Riga FC II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 65% | 56% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.25 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Riga FC II is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 0.8 pts / match - Riga FC II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga FC II is 119% better for: goals scored per match.
0.63 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.38 goals / match - Riga FC II
Riga FC II is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
3.38 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 2.38 goals / match - Riga FC II
Rēzekne / BJSS scores in 50% of matches (4 of 8 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 matches).
Riga FC II scores in 63% of matches (5 of 8 matches), while Rēzekne / BJSS keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rēzekne / BJSS
Over / Under - Riga FC II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga FC II is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.5 pts / match - Riga FC II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rēzekne / BJSS - second-half results
Concedes 1.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Riga FC II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 2.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rēzekne / BJSS
Riga FC II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rēzekne / BJSS | Liga | Riga FC II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.00 | 3.45 | ▲ 3.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 69% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 69% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 85% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Riga FC IIGoalNils Voitiskis
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Rēzekne / BJSS 2 - 0 - 0 Riga FC II. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rēzekne / BJSS vs Riga FC II?
The 1. Liga match finished Rēzekne / BJSS 1:3 Riga FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rēzekne / BJSS and Riga FC II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rēzekne / BJSS won 2, Riga FC II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rēzekne / BJSS vs Riga FC II?
Rēzekne / BJSS score 0.63 goals per game on average and Riga FC II 1.38. The 1. Liga average is 3.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Rēzekne / BJSS's matches and 63% of Riga FC II's.
What form are Rēzekne / BJSS and Riga FC II in?
Over the last 5 games Rēzekne / BJSS have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Riga FC II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Riga FC II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.