RFC Liege vs Olympic Charleroi: match statistics
RFC Liege vs Olympic Charleroi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
RFC Liege played Olympic Charleroi in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 5 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
RFC Liege: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Olympic Charleroi: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
RFC Liege scores 1.31 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Olympic Charleroi scores 0.86 and concedes 2.07. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: RFC Liege 38%, Olympic Charleroi 52%. Over 2.5: RFC Liege 41%, Olympic Charleroi 59%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Olympic Charleroi has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.29. RFC Liege: 11.0 shots per match, Olympic Charleroi: 11.6.
Match halves
RFC Liege: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.45. Olympic Charleroi: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
RFC Liege: 31-45+ (10 goals). Olympic Charleroi: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
RFC Liège holds a clear seasonal edge: 13 wins versus 3 for Olympic Charleroi and 6th place vs 17th in the table, with a 38:25 goal difference favoring the hosts. At home Liège averages 1.71 goals scored and concedes 1.14 per match, while Charleroi on the road scores 1.29 and concedes 1.79, giving the hosts an advantage in defensive stability and goal output. In the last 5 matches the home side scored 5 goals, won 1, drew 1 and lost 3, yielding 0.8 points per game; the visitors lost all of their last 5 fixtures, scored 4 and conceded 13, indicating a significant form regression for Charleroi. xG is 1.56 for Liège versus 1.43 for Charleroi, and the hosts convert shots at 13% compared to the visitors’ 11%, with average shots 13.36 vs 12.07—suggesting that with similar quality chances the hosts are more efficient. Considering the advantage in wins (13 vs 3), superior goal difference (38:25) and lower average goals conceded at home (1.14 vs 1.79), I back a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes at 62% vs 38% because the last 5 matches of both teams show BTTS at 60% and the league season rate is 55%. Olympic Charleroi has a seasonal BTTS rate of 64%, averages 1.43 xG and 5.0 shots on target, indicating clear offensive potential; RFC Liege has xG 1.27 but scores only 0.47 goals at home this season, pointing to low finishing. Both sides concede many goals: RFC concedes 2.33 goals at home on average (2.2 in the last 5), and Charleroi 1.79 this season (2.6 in the last 5), which increases the likelihood of goals from both teams. Clean sheets are rare — 7% for RFC and 14% for Charleroi — and combined shot output (averaging 11.13 and 12.07) and total xG around 2.7 favor at least one goal for each side. The main risk is RFC’s very low conversion rate at 4% vs Charleroi’s 11%, so I rate BTTS moderately high, hence the 62% selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total expected goals at 2.87 (xG): 1.41 for RFC Liege and 1.46 for Olympic Charleroi, based on comparing RFC’s attack xG (1.27) with Charleroi’s defensive xG (1.55) and Charleroi’s attack xG (1.43) with RFC’s defensive xG (1.49). Both teams have a high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals: RFC 80% and Charleroi 79%, while the league average is 2.82 goals per game, which strongly supports the Over 1.5 line. Additionally, RFC concedes an average of 2.33 goals per match and has conceded 11 goals in the last 5 games (2.2 per match), and Charleroi conceded 13 in their last 5 (2.6 per match), so both sides show defensive vulnerability. Charleroi registers more shots on target (5.0 vs 3.2) and has a higher shot conversion rate of 11% versus RFC’s 4%, increasing the likelihood of chances being converted. A Poisson model and historical percentages give an Over 1.5 probability of around 78% (Over 2.5 ~55%, Over 3.5 ~32%), therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side led at the break in 0 of 15 matches and were trailing at the break in 9 of 15 (60%), with an average of 0.13 goals scored and 1.00 conceded by half-time. The visitors average 1.29 goals per match and 0.5 by half-time, have more shots on target (5.0 vs 3.2) and a higher conversion rate (11% vs 4%), and the visitors’ xG is 1.43 versus the hosts’ 1.27, giving the away team a quality advantage. The hosts concede 2.33 goals per match on average and have an average of 0.13 points per match with a 0% home win rate, while the visitors average 1.0 points per match and a 21% win rate, so the final result also favors the away team. Considering that the hosts regularly trail by half-time and have low finishing efficiency, the strongest signal is the visitors leading at the break and winning at full-time, therefore I select the 2/2 combination.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| RFC Liege | Olympic Charleroi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RFC Liege is 52% better for: goals scored per match.
1.31 goals / match - RFC Liege · 0.86 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi
RFC Liege is 62% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.28 goals / match - RFC Liege · 2.07 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi
RFC Liege scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Olympic Charleroi keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 29 matches).
Olympic Charleroi scores in 55% of matches (16 of 29 matches), while RFC Liege keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RFC Liege
Over / Under - Olympic Charleroi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RFC Liege is 131% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.66 pts / match - RFC Liege · 0.72 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RFC Liege - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 45%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Olympic Charleroi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 10%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
RFC Liege
Olympic Charleroi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| RFC Liege | Liga | Olympic Charleroi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.59 | 2.82 | ▲ 2.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 54% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 53% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 26% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 71% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 78% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: RFC Liege 0 - 1 - 0 Olympic Charleroi. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of RFC Liege vs Olympic Charleroi?
The First Division B match finished RFC Liege 2:1 Olympic Charleroi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RFC Liege vs Olympic Charleroi?
RFC Liege score 1.31 goals per game on average and Olympic Charleroi 0.86. The First Division B average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 38% of RFC Liege's matches and 52% of Olympic Charleroi's.
What form are RFC Liege and Olympic Charleroi in?
Over the last 5 games RFC Liege have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Olympic Charleroi 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RFC Liege vs Olympic Charleroi?
The statistical background for RFC Liege vs Olympic Charleroi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


