RFC Seraing vs Club Brugge II: match statistics
RFC Seraing vs Club Brugge II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
RFC Seraing played Club Brugge II in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 30 November 2025. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
RFC Seraing: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Club Brugge II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
RFC Seraing scores 1.00 and concedes 1.77 goals per match. Club Brugge II scores 0.85 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: RFC Seraing 62%, Club Brugge II 69%. Over 2.5: RFC Seraing 54%, Club Brugge II 54%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
RFC Seraing has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.32. RFC Seraing: 12.8 shots per match, Club Brugge II: 11.7.
Match halves
RFC Seraing: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.77. Club Brugge II: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
RFC Seraing: 46-60 (4 goals). Club Brugge II: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| RFC Seraing | Club Brugge II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
RFC Seraing is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - RFC Seraing · 0.2 pts / match - Club Brugge II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RFC Seraing is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - RFC Seraing · 0.85 goals / match - Club Brugge II
RFC Seraing is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.77 goals / match - RFC Seraing · 2 goals / match - Club Brugge II
RFC Seraing scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 13 matches).
Club Brugge II scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RFC Seraing
Over / Under - Club Brugge II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Club Brugge II is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.54 pts / match - RFC Seraing · 0.62 pts / match - Club Brugge II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RFC Seraing - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Club Brugge II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
RFC Seraing
Club Brugge II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| RFC Seraing | Liga | Club Brugge II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.77 | 2.71 | ▲ 2.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 53% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 50% | ▲ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 27% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 74% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 80% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of RFC Seraing vs Club Brugge II?
The First Division B match finished RFC Seraing 1:0 Club Brugge II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RFC Seraing vs Club Brugge II?
RFC Seraing score 1.00 goals per game on average and Club Brugge II 0.85. The First Division B average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 62% of RFC Seraing's matches and 69% of Club Brugge II's.
What form are RFC Seraing and Club Brugge II in?
Over the last 5 games RFC Seraing have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Club Brugge II 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RFC Seraing vs Club Brugge II?
The statistical background for RFC Seraing vs Club Brugge II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.