Belgium - First Division BData current as of 23 July 2026

RFC Seraing vs Patro Eisden: match statistics

RFC Seraing crest
RFC Seraing
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Patro Eisden crest
Patro Eisden

RFC Seraing vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RFC Seraing play Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 5 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

RFC Seraing: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Patro Eisden: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

RFC Seraing scores 1.16 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Patro Eisden scores 1.38 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RFC Seraing 50%, Patro Eisden 53%. Over 2.5: RFC Seraing 50%, Patro Eisden 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.37. RFC Seraing: 11.8 shots per match, Patro Eisden: 14.8.

Match halves

RFC Seraing: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.81. Patro Eisden: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

RFC Seraing: 76-90+ (10 goals). Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I back the home win. RFC Seraing shows significantly better form over the last 5 matches: 3 wins and 2 draws, averaging 2.2 points per game and 11 goals scored, whereas Patro has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, averaging 1.0 point per game and only 4 goals. Seasonal figures, however, favor the visitors — Patro has 13 wins versus Seraing’s 7, 40 goals scored versus 33, and a higher away xG average of 1.73 compared to Seraing’s 1.44 xG at home. Seraing is more efficient in finishing at home: on average 1.62 goals per match and a 13% conversion rate with 15% of matches without scoring, while Patro away averages 1.4 goals, a 9% conversion and 33% of matches without a goal. Defensively they are relatively even (Patro concedes 1.07 goals away versus Seraing conceding 1.38 at home), but considering current form (Patro conceded 8 goals in their last 5 matches vs. 4 for Seraing) and the superior home efficiency, I rate Seraing 55%, draw 20% and Patro win 25%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
8Shots13
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
4Shots on target7
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
1.09xG1.65
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
6Corners4
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
42Dangerous attacks47
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
19Fouls13
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
3Cards3
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
1.16Goals scored / match1.38
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
1.38Goals conceded / match1.29
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
41%Average possession37%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
4Shots on target / match5.24
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.75Shots per match14.82
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
4Shots on target5.24
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
9.8%Shot conversion9.3%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
41%Possession37%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
1.37xG for1.65
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
1.48xG against1.16
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

RFC Seraing: BalancedPatro Eisden: Attacking
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

RFC Seraing is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - RFC Seraing · 0.8 pts / match - Patro Eisden

RFC Seraing
DDWDL
Season result split
25% W34% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-13
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Patro Eisden
LLWDL
Season result split
41% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-10
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Patro Eisden is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - RFC Seraing · 1.38 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - RFC Seraing · 1.29 goals / match - Patro Eisden

RFC Seraing scoring profile: strong

RFC Seraing scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

Patro Eisden scoring profile: strong

Patro Eisden scores in 71% of matches (24 of 34 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).

37Goals scored (season)47
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
44Goals conceded (season)44
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
2.53Average goals in match2.68
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
6Goals scored (last 5)7
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
5Goals conceded (last 5)10
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal71%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
31%2 goals41%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
13%3 goals15%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
6%4 goals12%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal71%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
47%2 goals38%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
13%3 goals12%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
3%4 goals9%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time15%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
3%BTTS in both halves6%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
19%Scored in both halves21%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
60%BTTS - last 540%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Patro Eisden is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / match - RFC Seraing · 1.44 pts / match - Patro Eisden

RFC Seraing - half-time state
13% leading53% draw34% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
35% leading38% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per match (1st half)1.44
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.56
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
0.97Average goals (1st half)1
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
56%Clean sheet before half-time59%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
72%No goal before half-time59%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.24
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
0.66Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.68
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
56%Clean sheet after half-time41%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden
44%No goal after half-time50%
RFC SeraingPatro Eisden

RFC Seraing - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding192%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

29% W35% R35% P
49
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RFC Seraing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
2
6
16-30
3
9
31-45
9
7
46-60
7
5
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
5
4
16-30
7
5
31-45
8
9
46-60
8
7
61-75
12
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RFC SeraingLigaPatro Eisden
Average goals in match 2.532.84 2.68
Both teams scored 50%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%54% 47%
Clean sheets 28%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 56%71% 68%
Goal after half-time 75%79% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RFC Seraing 0 - 1 - 0 Patro Eisden. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Patro Eisden Maasmechelen
2 : 2
RFC Seraing

FAQ

What was the result of RFC Seraing vs Patro Eisden?

The First Division B match finished RFC Seraing 2:0 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RFC Seraing vs Patro Eisden?

RFC Seraing score 1.16 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.38. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 50% of RFC Seraing's matches and 53% of Patro Eisden's.

What form are RFC Seraing and Patro Eisden in?

Over the last 5 games RFC Seraing have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Patro Eisden 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RFC Seraing vs Patro Eisden?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RFC Seraing vs Patro Eisden: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.