RFC Seraing vs RWDM: match statistics
RWDM demonstrates a clear advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics. The visitors score an average of 1.63 goals per away match compared to just 1.13 for RFC Seraing at home, while also maintaining better shot conversion (12% vs 10%) and dominating possession (52% vs 40%). RFC Seraing shows alarming form with only one win in the last five matches and a 50% loss rate in home games this season. RWDM has a positive goal difference away (+1) unlike the hosts (-2 at home) and a higher away win percentage (38% vs 25% for the hosts). The table position (15th place RFC Seraing vs 11th place RWDM) further confirms the advantage of the visitors, who, despite variable form in the last five matches, possess significantly better xG parameters (1.51 vs 1.32). All these factors point to a likely victory for RWDM, although the weak defense of both teams could lead to a draw.
RFC Seraing vs RWDM: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
RFC Seraing played RWDM in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 16 January 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
RFC Seraing: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. RWDM: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
RFC Seraing scores 0.88 and concedes 1.65 goals per match. RWDM scores 1.67 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.76 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: RFC Seraing 53%, RWDM 56%. Over 2.5: RFC Seraing 47%, RWDM 61%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
RWDM has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.37. RFC Seraing: 12.4 shots per match, RWDM: 12.7.
Match halves
RFC Seraing: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.59. RWDM: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
RFC Seraing: 46-60 (4 goals). RWDM: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
RWDM demonstrates a clear advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics. The visitors score an average of 1.63 goals per away match compared to just 1.13 for RFC Seraing at home, while also maintaining better shot conversion (12% vs 10%) and dominating possession (52% vs 40%). RFC Seraing shows alarming form with only one win in the last five matches and a 50% loss rate in home games this season. RWDM has a positive goal difference away (+1) unlike the hosts (-2 at home) and a higher away win percentage (38% vs 25% for the hosts). The table position (15th place RFC Seraing vs 11th place RWDM) further confirms the advantage of the visitors, who, despite variable form in the last five matches, possess significantly better xG parameters (1.51 vs 1.32). All these factors point to a likely victory for RWDM, although the weak defense of both teams could lead to a draw.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| RFC Seraing | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
RWDM is 25% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - RFC Seraing · 1 pts / match - RWDM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RWDM is 90% better for: goals scored per match.
0.88 goals / match - RFC Seraing · 1.67 goals / match - RWDM
RFC Seraing scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).
RWDM scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RFC Seraing
Over / Under - RWDM
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RWDM is 140% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.65 pts / match - RFC Seraing · 1.56 pts / match - RWDM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RFC Seraing - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
RWDM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 28%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
RFC Seraing
RWDM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| RFC Seraing | Liga | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.53 | 2.76 | ▲ 3.39 |
| Both teams scored | • 53% | 53% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 51% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 27% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 73% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 79% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: RFC Seraing 0 - 0 - 1 RWDM. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of RFC Seraing vs RWDM?
The First Division B match finished RFC Seraing 3:1 RWDM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RFC Seraing vs RWDM?
RFC Seraing score 0.88 goals per game on average and RWDM 1.67. The First Division B average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 53% of RFC Seraing's matches and 56% of RWDM's.
What form are RFC Seraing and RWDM in?
Over the last 5 games RFC Seraing have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and RWDM 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RFC Seraing vs RWDM?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RFC Seraing vs RWDM: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.