South Africa - Premier Soccer LeagueRichards Bay Sports StadiumData current as of 17 October 2026

Richards Bay vs AmaZulu: match statistics

Richards Bay crest
Richards Bay
1 : 2half-time 0:0
AmaZulu crest
AmaZulu

Richards Bay vs AmaZulu: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Richards Bay played AmaZulu in Premier Soccer League (South Africa). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Venue: Richards Bay Sports Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Richards Bay: 0-3-1, 0.75 points/match. AmaZulu: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

Richards Bay scores 1.25 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. AmaZulu scores 1.50 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Richards Bay 100%, AmaZulu 50%. Over 2.5: Richards Bay 50%, AmaZulu 25%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Richards Bay has higher xG: 1.48 vs 0.94. Richards Bay: 12.0 shots per match, AmaZulu: 6.5.

Match halves

Richards Bay: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. AmaZulu: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Richards Bay: 0-15 (2 goals). AmaZulu: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premier Soccer League: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AmaZulu sit 5th, while Richards Bay are only 12th, with the visitors collecting 7 points from four matches this season compared to the hosts’ 3 points. Richards Bay’s form remains poor: they have failed to win any of their last five matches, recording 3 draws and 2 defeats, whereas AmaZulu have secured 2 victories during the same period. The hosts create more chances at home, averaging 1.64 xG and 5.5 shots on target per match, but their defence allows opponents 1.76 xG and concedes an average of 2 goals. AmaZulu have a lower away xG of 0.81, but their 27% conversion rate is impressive, and they also score an average of 1.5 goals per game. Neither side has shown consistent defensive stability, but AmaZulu’s superior points tally and more effective recent run slightly favour an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for both teams to score is strengthened by their current form: BTTS occurred in 80% of Richards Bay’s last five matches and in 60% of AmaZulu’s fixtures. During this period, Richards Bay conceded an average of 1.4 goals, while AmaZulu conceded as many as 2.0, with their average xG against standing at 1.72 and 1.78 respectively. The visitors have recently scored 1.8 goals per match, while the hosts have recorded 1.34 xG across their last five appearances, which should give them a solid chance of exploiting the opponent’s defensive problems. Both teams kept a clean sheet in only 50% of their matches this season, and neither has finished a match without scoring. Although the league has a moderate BTTS rate of 47%, the current defensive numbers of both sides clearly shift the prediction towards a "BTTS - Yes" scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as Richards Bay have surpassed this line in 100% of their matches so far, while AmaZulu have done so in 50%. Both teams have scored at least once in every league match this season, with the hosts averaging 1.5 goals and the visitors also averaging 1.5 goals per game. Their last five outings point to increased goal potential: AmaZulu have averaged 1.8 goals, while both teams have conceded 1.4 and 2.0 goals respectively. xG is moderate, at 1.08 for the hosts and 0.81 for the visitors, but recent defensive weakness and an average of 2.7 expected goals support a minimum of two goals. The 2.5 line remains much more balanced, as only 40% of each team's last five matches finished with three or more goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Richards Bay have a clear first-half profile: they led at the break in 50% of their matches so far, scoring an average of 1.5 goals and conceding just 0.5, while AmaZulu have not taken the lead even once and have failed to score before half-time. The hosts have averaged 2.0 points per match in the first half, compared with AmaZulu’s 0.5, supporting the scenario of Richards Bay gaining the upper hand early on. At home, Richards Bay concede just 0.5 goals per full match on average, whereas AmaZulu allow opponents 2.5 goals away from home. The last five matches are less favourable for the hosts, who have not won any of them, but AmaZulu have also lost 40% of those fixtures and conceded an average of 2.0 goals. The most likely outcome therefore remains Richards Bay leading at half-time and maintaining their advantage until the end, although AmaZulu’s second-half activity reduces confidence in this scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Richards BayAmaZulu
13Shots16
Richards BayAmaZulu
3Shots on target3
Richards BayAmaZulu
1.56xG1.62
Richards BayAmaZulu
7Corners7
Richards BayAmaZulu
73Dangerous attacks56
Richards BayAmaZulu
9Fouls15
Richards BayAmaZulu
2Cards0
Richards BayAmaZulu

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Richards BayAmaZulu
1.25Goals scored / match1.5
Richards BayAmaZulu
1.5Goals conceded / match1.5
Richards BayAmaZulu
46%Average possession38%
Richards BayAmaZulu
4.75Shots on target / match2.75
Richards BayAmaZulu

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match6.5
Richards BayAmaZulu
4.75Shots on target2.75
Richards BayAmaZulu
10.4%Shot conversion23.1%
Richards BayAmaZulu
46%Possession38%
Richards BayAmaZulu
1.48xG for0.94
Richards BayAmaZulu
1.71xG against1.88
Richards BayAmaZulu

Shooting quality

Richards Bay: BalancedAmaZulu: Counter-attacking
Richards BayAmaZulu
Accuracy (shots on target)40%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.55

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AmaZulu is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.75 pts / match - Richards Bay · 1.75 pts / match - AmaZulu

Richards Bay
LDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W75% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-1
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-1
0.75 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%
AmaZulu
WDWL
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 0.94Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 25%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AmaZulu is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Richards Bay · 1.5 goals / match - AmaZulu

Richards Bay scoring profile: very strong

Richards Bay scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while AmaZulu keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

AmaZulu scoring profile: very strong

AmaZulu scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Richards Bay keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

5Goals scored (season)6
Richards BayAmaZulu
6Goals conceded (season)6
Richards BayAmaZulu
2.75Average goals in match3
Richards BayAmaZulu
5Goals scored (last 5)6
Richards BayAmaZulu
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Richards BayAmaZulu

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Richards BayAmaZulu
25%2 goals50%
Richards BayAmaZulu
0%3 goals0%
Richards BayAmaZulu
0%4 goals0%
Richards BayAmaZulu

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Richards BayAmaZulu
50%2 goals25%
Richards BayAmaZulu
0%3 goals25%
Richards BayAmaZulu
0%4 goals25%
Richards BayAmaZulu

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
Richards BayAmaZulu
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Richards BayAmaZulu
0%Scored in both halves0%
Richards BayAmaZulu

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Richards BayAmaZulu
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Richards BayAmaZulu
100%BTTS - last 550%
Richards BayAmaZulu

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Richards BayAmaZulu
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time75%
Richards BayAmaZulu
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Richards BayAmaZulu

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Richards BayAmaZulu
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Richards BayAmaZulu
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Richards BayAmaZulu

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Richards Bay is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Richards Bay · 1.25 pts / match - AmaZulu

Richards Bay - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing
AmaZulu - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.25
Richards BayAmaZulu
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Richards BayAmaZulu
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Richards BayAmaZulu
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.5
Richards BayAmaZulu
25%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Richards BayAmaZulu
50%No goal before half-time50%
Richards BayAmaZulu

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.25
Richards BayAmaZulu
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Richards BayAmaZulu
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Richards BayAmaZulu
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Richards BayAmaZulu
25%Clean sheet after half-time75%
Richards BayAmaZulu
50%No goal after half-time50%
Richards BayAmaZulu

Richards Bay - second-half results

25% W25% D50% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AmaZulu - second-half results

25% W50% D25% L
5
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Richards Bay - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.00
Goals scored / match0.80.5
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.51.3
1 goal100%100%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet25%25%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3
AmaZulu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.251.25
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.51.5
1 goal75%50%
2 goals75%25%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet50%75%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 25% leading - 50% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Richards Bay
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
3
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

AmaZulu
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
123%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Richards Bay

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

AmaZulu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.94
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.94
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Soccer League).

Teams vs league

Richards BayLigaAmaZulu
Average goals in match▲ 2.752.34▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%43%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%34%▼ 25%
Clean sheets▼ 0%37%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%60%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%71%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.06
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Richards BayYellow cardNqaba Xulu
  2. Richards BayYellow cardLindokuhle Sphuzo Zikhali
  3. Richards BaySubstitutionOn: Lundi MahalaOff: Sanele Barns
  4. AmaZuluSubstitutionOn: Gape MoraloOff: Langelihle Mhlongo
  5. AmaZuluSubstitutionOn: Hendrick EksteinOff: Mondli Mbanjwa
  6. Richards BayGoalMoses Mthembu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Richards Bay 1 - 0 - 1 AmaZulu. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Richards Bay vs AmaZulu?

The Premier Soccer League match finished Richards Bay 1:2 AmaZulu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Richards Bay and AmaZulu?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Richards Bay won 1, AmaZulu won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Richards Bay vs AmaZulu?

Richards Bay score 1.25 goals per game on average and AmaZulu 1.50. The Premier Soccer League average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Richards Bay's matches and 50% of AmaZulu's.

What form are Richards Bay and AmaZulu in?

Over the last 5 games Richards Bay have a 0-3-1 record (0.75 points per game) and AmaZulu 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Richards Bay vs AmaZulu?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Richards Bay vs AmaZulu: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.