South Africa - Premier Soccer LeagueData current as of 12 September 2026

Richards Bay vs Polokwane City: match statistics

Richards Bay crest
Richards Bay
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Polokwane City crest
Polokwane City

Richards Bay vs Polokwane City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Richards Bay played Polokwane City in Premier Soccer League (South Africa). The match was played on 6 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Richards Bay: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Polokwane City: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Richards Bay scores 0.81 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Polokwane City scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74. League average: 2.04 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Richards Bay 42%, Polokwane City 33%. Over 2.5: Richards Bay 31%, Polokwane City 26%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Richards Bay: 11.4 shots per match, Polokwane City: 11.7.

Match halves

Richards Bay: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.35. Polokwane City: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Richards Bay: 31-45+ (6 goals). Polokwane City: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premier Soccer League: 2.04 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Richards Bay hold the edge in attack and current form: at home they average 1.15 goals per match versus Polokwane’s 0.77 on the road, and in the last 5 fixtures the hosts have scored 5 goals and collected an average of 1.6 points per game, while the visitors have only 2 goals and 1.0 point per game. Richards Bay register on average 4.62 shots on target at home compared to Polokwane’s 2.77 SOT away, with conversion rates of 10% versus 7%, indicating superior efficiency and quality of chances for the hosts. xG also slightly favors the home side: Richards Bay’s average home xG is 1.45 against Polokwane’s 1.28 away, while both teams concede an average of 0.85 goals (hosts at home, visitors away), so the defenses are comparable. Additionally, the hosts have 46% of home matches with a clean sheet and only 15% of home matches without scoring, whereas the visitors fail to score in 46% of away games and keep 31% clean sheets on the road; this increases the probability of a narrow home win. Given the advantage in chance creation and conversion plus superior recent form, I assign 55% to a home win, 30% to a draw and 15% to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show low scoring averages: Richards Bay 0.71 goals per match and Polokwane City 0.77, with goals conceded averages 0.64 and 0.85 respectively, indicating few goals. Seasonal BTTS rates are 36% for the home side and 31% for the visitors, versus a league BTTS average of 39%, so the “both teams to score” scenario occurs less than half the time. Richards Bay keep a clean sheet in 50% of home matches, while Polokwane do so in 31%, providing a strong signal for at least one clean sheet in this fixture. Although xG is 1.45 for the home team and 1.28 for the away team, low shot conversion (6% and 7%) and average shots on target (3.14 and 2.77) limit chances translating into goals. In the last 5 matches Polokwane scored only 2 goals (0.4 avg), and Richards Bay 5 goals (1.0 avg), therefore the most probable and strongest signal from the data is a

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Season averages show Richards Bay scores 0.71 goals per match and Polokwane 0.77, totaling 1.48 goals; therefore I expect about 1.49 goals in the match (0.78 home, 0.71 away). xG signals greater attacking potential — xG_for is 1.45 for Richards Bay and 1.28 for Polokwane (total 2.73), while xG_against is 1.38 and 1.45 — but low shot conversion (6% and 7%) and 50% clean sheets for the home side suppress the number of actual goals. Over/Under metrics confirm a defensive pattern: Over 2.5 occurs in 29% of Richards Bay’s matches this season and 23% of Polokwane’s (avg ~26%), while the league has 32% of matches over 2.5, so I assess Over 2.5 at 28% (Under 72%). Over 1.5 appears in 36% of home matches and 46% of away matches, giving my forecast Over 1.5=45% and Under 1.5=55%. Considering the low combined average of 1.48 goals, the high share of clean sheets for Richards Bay (50%) and the low seasonal Over2.5 rates (29%/23%), I recommend Under 2.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). Richards Bay drew at half-time in 71% of their home matches and finished home games as draws in 50% of fixtures, strongly favoring a shared points outcome. The league clean-sheet rate is 74%, and the seasonal percentage of matches where both teams scored is low (36% for hosts, 31% for visitors), so I expect few goals and maintenance of the draw. The home side have higher xG (1.45 vs 1.28 for the visitors), but low shot conversion (6% vs 7%) and the fact Richards Bay kept a clean sheet in 86% of halves reduces the translation of chances into goals; Polokwane scored 10 goals by half-time versus 7 for the hosts and led at the break in 38% of matches (vs 21% for the hosts), which introduces some risk of the visitors leading after 45 minutes. On that basis I assign roughly a 39% probability to the X/X scenario, 16% to X/1 and 10% to X/2, with remaining variants allocated smaller values, reflecting the dominant draw signal from the data.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Richards BayPolokwane City
14Shots19
Richards BayPolokwane City
7Shots on target3
Richards BayPolokwane City
1.59xG1.61
Richards BayPolokwane City
4Corners4
Richards BayPolokwane City
31Dangerous attacks29
Richards BayPolokwane City
15Fouls9
Richards BayPolokwane City
1Cards1
Richards BayPolokwane City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Richards BayPolokwane City
0.81Goals scored / match0.74
Richards BayPolokwane City
1.04Goals conceded / match0.74
Richards BayPolokwane City
44%Average possession44%
Richards BayPolokwane City
3.73Shots on target / match2.96
Richards BayPolokwane City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.38Shots per match11.74
Richards BayPolokwane City
3.73Shots on target2.96
Richards BayPolokwane City
7.1%Shot conversion6.3%
Richards BayPolokwane City
44%Possession44%
Richards BayPolokwane City
1.38xG for1.38
Richards BayPolokwane City
1.49xG against1.41
Richards BayPolokwane City

Shooting quality

Richards Bay: BalancedPolokwane City: Balanced
Richards BayPolokwane City
Accuracy (shots on target)33%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Richards Bay is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Richards Bay · 1 pts / match - Polokwane City

Richards Bay
LWDWD
Season result split
27% W38% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-10-9
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-2
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Polokwane City
DDWLL
Season result split
33% W37% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-8
1.37 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Richards Bay is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - Richards Bay · 0.74 goals / match - Polokwane City

Polokwane City is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.04 goals / match - Richards Bay · 0.74 goals / match - Polokwane City

Richards Bay scoring profile: mixed

Richards Bay scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while Polokwane City keeps a clean sheet in 41% (11 of 27 matches).

Polokwane City scoring profile: mixed

Polokwane City scores in 52% of matches (14 of 27 matches), while Richards Bay keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

21Goals scored (season)20
Richards BayPolokwane City
27Goals conceded (season)20
Richards BayPolokwane City
1.85Average goals in match1.48
Richards BayPolokwane City
5Goals scored (last 5)2
Richards BayPolokwane City
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Richards BayPolokwane City

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal52%
Richards BayPolokwane City
15%2 goals22%
Richards BayPolokwane City
0%3 goals0%
Richards BayPolokwane City
0%4 goals0%
Richards BayPolokwane City

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal59%
Richards BayPolokwane City
31%2 goals11%
Richards BayPolokwane City
8%3 goals4%
Richards BayPolokwane City
4%4 goals0%
Richards BayPolokwane City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time4%
Richards BayPolokwane City
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Richards BayPolokwane City
15%Scored in both halves11%
Richards BayPolokwane City

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
Richards BayPolokwane City
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Richards BayPolokwane City
40%BTTS - last 520%
Richards BayPolokwane City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
Richards BayPolokwane City
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
Richards BayPolokwane City
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Richards BayPolokwane City

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time59%
Richards BayPolokwane City
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
Richards BayPolokwane City
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Richards BayPolokwane City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Polokwane City is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / match - Richards Bay · 1.41 pts / match - Polokwane City

Richards Bay - half-time state
19% leading62% draw19% trailing
Polokwane City - half-time state
30% leading52% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per match (1st half)1.41
Richards BayPolokwane City
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Richards BayPolokwane City
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.22
Richards BayPolokwane City
0.96Average goals (1st half)0.63
Richards BayPolokwane City
58%Clean sheet before half-time78%
Richards BayPolokwane City
54%No goal before half-time67%
Richards BayPolokwane City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.04
Richards BayPolokwane City
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
Richards BayPolokwane City
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
Richards BayPolokwane City
0.88Average goals (2nd half)0.85
Richards BayPolokwane City
54%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Richards BayPolokwane City
65%No goal after half-time70%
Richards BayPolokwane City

Richards Bay - second-half results

19% W46% D35% L
31
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Polokwane City - second-half results

19% W48% D33% L
38
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Richards Bay - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Polokwane City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Richards Bay
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
4
31-45
3
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Polokwane City
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
6
2
31-45
1
5
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Richards Bay

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Polokwane City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.67
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Soccer League).

Teams vs league

Richards BayLigaPolokwane City
Average goals in match 1.852.04 1.48
Both teams scored 42%39% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%32% 26%
Clean sheets 38%36% 41%
Goal before half-time 62%61% 52%
Goal after half-time 65%70% 59%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.04
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.16
Home goals / match
0.88
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Polokwane CityYellow cardEdwin Ramaja
  2. Richards BayYellow cardMoses Mthembu
  3. Polokwane CitySubstitutionOn: Keorapetse SeboneOff: Mokibelo Simon Ramabu
  4. Richards BaySubstitutionOn: Ntlonelo BomeloOff: Lundi Mahala

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Richards Bay 0 - 1 - 0 Polokwane City. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Polokwane City
1 : 1
Richards Bay

FAQ

What was the result of Richards Bay vs Polokwane City?

The Premier Soccer League match finished Richards Bay 0:0 Polokwane City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Richards Bay vs Polokwane City?

Richards Bay score 0.81 goals per game on average and Polokwane City 0.74. The Premier Soccer League average is 2.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Richards Bay's matches and 33% of Polokwane City's.

What form are Richards Bay and Polokwane City in?

Over the last 5 games Richards Bay have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Polokwane City 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Richards Bay vs Polokwane City?

The statistical background for Richards Bay vs Polokwane City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.