Richmond Kickers vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics
Richmond Kickers vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Richmond Kickers played Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: City Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Richmond Kickers: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Richmond Kickers scores 0.91 and concedes 1.96 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.91 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.94 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Richmond Kickers 48%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 65%. Over 2.5: Richmond Kickers 52%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 70%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Richmond Kickers has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.33. Richmond Kickers: 12.2 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 10.9.
Match halves
Richmond Kickers: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.39. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.04.
Goals by minute
Richmond Kickers: 0-15 (6 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chattanooga Red Wolves sit 7th, while Richmond Kickers are only 17th, and the visitors’ season record stands at 12 wins compared with 5 for the hosts. The visitors have scored 44 goals in 23 matches, more than twice Richmond’s tally of 21, and have found the net 11 times in their last five games, compared with just 2 goals for the hosts. Richmond are struggling for form, having lost 3 of their last 5 matches and averaging just 0.8 points per game during that run, while Chattanooga have been taking 1.4 points per match. However, the Red Wolves are defensively vulnerable away from home, conceding an average of 1.91 goals and keeping a clean sheet in only 9% of matches, so the hosts have a realistic chance of scoring. Nevertheless, the visitors’ superior conversion rate of 14% compared with Richmond’s 7%, along with their significantly stronger scoring trend, still points to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Chattanooga Red Wolves have recorded BTTS in 82% of their matches this season, well above the league average of 59%, while keeping a clean sheet in only 9% of games. The visitors score an average of 1.73 goals and register 4.36 shots on target per match, whereas Richmond concede an average of 1.25 goals, with an xG against of 1.76. Richmond is nevertheless the main risk factor for this pick, having scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, with BTTS landing in only 20% of those fixtures. On the other hand, Chattanooga have conceded 10 goals over the same period, an average of 2.0 per match, with an xG against of 1.96, clearly increasing the hosts’ chances of ending their poor scoring run. The visitors’ stronger defensive profile, combined with their high consistency in matches featuring goals from both teams, gives a slight lean towards BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Chattanooga’s profile clearly favors goals: Over 1.5 goals landed in 91% of their matches, while Over 2.5 goals did so in 82%. Richmond average 2.08 goals at home, whereas Chattanooga concede an average of 1.91 goals away, giving the hosts a realistic chance to overcome their recent poor form. Both defenses allow opponents quality chances, with average xG against of 1.76 for Richmond and 1.73 for Chattanooga, respectively. The visitors have scored 2.2 goals per game across their last five matches, but Richmond have managed just 0.4 during that span, making the 2.5 line riskier than the basic Over 1.5 market. The projected total of 2.65 goals indicates that at least two goals are the most likely scenario.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal comes from Chattanooga’s current form: the visitors have averaged 2.2 goals over their last five matches, compared with just 0.4 for Richmond. Chattanooga held a lead at the break in 60% of their last five games and scored an average of 1.2 first-half goals, while Richmond failed to score before half-time in any of those matches and were trailing at the break in 60% of cases. The visitors also have the edge in chance creation over the season, averaging 12.0 shots and 4.36 shots on target, compared with 9.92 and 3.75 for the hosts. Although Richmond have won 58% of their matches this season, their recent run has produced three defeats in five outings, while conceding an average of 1.8 goals. A Chattanooga lead at half-time followed by a victory is therefore the most likely scenario, although the visitors’ high average of 2.0 goals conceded over their last five matches limits confidence in this HT/FT selection: 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Richmond Kickers | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.4 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 110% better for: goals scored per match.
0.91 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.91 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.96 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.57 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Richmond Kickers scores in 61% of matches (14 of 23 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 91% of matches (21 of 23 matches), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Richmond Kickers
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.35 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Richmond Kickers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Richmond Kickers
Chattanooga Red Wolves
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Richmond Kickers | Liga | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.87 | 2.94 | ▲ 3.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 59% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 60% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 23% | ▲ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 73% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 81% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Richmond Kickers 0 - 1 - 2 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Richmond Kickers vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
The USL League One match finished Richmond Kickers 1:1 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Richmond Kickers and Chattanooga Red Wolves?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Richmond Kickers won 0, Chattanooga Red Wolves won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Richmond Kickers vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Richmond Kickers score 0.91 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.91. The USL League One average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Richmond Kickers's matches and 65% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.
What form are Richmond Kickers and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?
Over the last 5 games Richmond Kickers have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Richmond Kickers vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Richmond Kickers vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


