United States - USL League OneCity StadiumData current as of 06 September 2026

Richmond Kickers vs Fort Wayne: match statistics

Richmond Kickers crest
Richmond Kickers
0 : 2half-time 0:2
Fort Wayne crest
Fort Wayne

Richmond Kickers vs Fort Wayne: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Richmond Kickers played Fort Wayne in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 20 June 2026. Venue: City Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Richmond Kickers: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Fort Wayne: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Richmond Kickers scores 1.00 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. Fort Wayne scores 1.25 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Richmond Kickers 45%, Fort Wayne 50%. Over 2.5: Richmond Kickers 55%, Fort Wayne 33%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Fort Wayne has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.31. Richmond Kickers: 11.2 shots per match, Fort Wayne: 13.3.

Match halves

Richmond Kickers: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.45. Fort Wayne: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Richmond Kickers: 0-15 (3 goals). Fort Wayne: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fort Wayne is the favorite in this match due to superior form and league position: they sit 6th versus Richmond’s 14th, have scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches versus the home side’s 3, and have averaged 1.2 points per match in that period compared to just 0.2 for Richmond. Defensively the visitors have a clear advantage — Richmond conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per match), while Fort Wayne conceded 7 (1.4 per match); season averages show 1.0 goals conceded at home versus 1.29 for the away side. Offensively Richmond creates more chances at home (14 shots and 5 on target on average with xG 1.59), while Fort Wayne away averages 11.29 shots, 3 on target and xG 1.28; however shot conversion is 9% for Richmond and 10% for Fort Wayne, and the home side have only 3 goals in their last 5. Additionally Fort Wayne control games on the road (53% possession) and have a higher away draw rate (43%), which gives them greater points stability; at the same time Richmond’s very poor run (0.2 points in the last 5) significantly increases the risk of a home defeat. Therefore I forecast a Fort Wayne win, although a draw remains a realistic scenario given Richmond’s ability to create chances at home.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Richmond presents a strong seasonal case against BTTS: 60% clean sheets and only 0.6 goals conceded per match on average, with the home-season BTTS rate at 40%. Fort Wayne, conversely, has a seasonal BTTS of 57% and an 80% BTTS rate in the last 5 matches; the visitors scored 7 goals in those 5 (1.4 avg), while Richmond conceded 12 in those 5 (2.4 avg). League-wide BTTS incidence is 56%, and xG indicates Richmond creates more chances (1.82 xG vs 1.28 xG for Fort Wayne) and registers more shots on target (5.8 vs 3.0), suggesting potential for goals from both sides. Weighing the conflicting signals — Richmond’s 60% clean sheets versus Fort Wayne’s strong recent scoring form (80% BTTS last 5) and 1.4 away goals in last 5 — I favor the "YES" (BTTS - Yes) scenario and estimate BTTS probability at approximately 60%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Estimated xG for this match is approximately 1.74 for Richmond and 1.24 for Fort Wayne, totaling 2.98 expected goals and providing a strong signal for Over 1.5 goals. Richmond generates more chances (avg. 16.0 shots and 5.8 on target) versus Fort Wayne (11.29 shots and 3.0 on target), and their attacking xG is 1.82 vs 1.28, so the hosts will create clear opportunities. Season stats show both teams frequently exceed 1.5 goals (Richmond 60% of matches, Fort Wayne 86%), while Over 2.5 is less certain (40% and 29%), explaining the moderate probability for Over 2.5. Given the calculated probabilities (Over 1.5 ~80%, Over 2.5 ~57%, Over 3.5 ~35%), I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest and most likely selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Richmond has a season xG of 1.82 versus Fort Wayne’s 1.28 and averages 5.8 shots on target compared to the visitors’ 3.0, indicating the home side’s advantage in chance creation. At the same time the hosts concede only 0.6 goals per match on average and keep a clean sheet in 60% of games; they maintain a clean sheet at half-time in 80% of matches and are level at the break in 80% of their games, which strongly favors a draw at half-time. The visitors have a season BTTS of 57% and concede 1.29 goals per match while in their last five fixtures they averaged 1.2 points versus the hosts’ 0.2, so they are particularly dangerous in the second half. Given the high half-time draw rate (80%) and the hosts’ high overall draw rate (60%), the most likely scenario is draw/draw (X/X) — I assign it 36%; alternatively draw then home turnaround (X/1) 28% and draw then away turnaround (X/2) 12%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
14Shots11
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
4Shots on target4
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
1.61xG1.27
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
4Corners3
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
61Dangerous attacks40
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
12Fouls11
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
2Cards4
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Richmond KickersFort Wayne
1Goals scored / match1.25
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
1.55Goals conceded / match1
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
41%Average possession53%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
3.73Shots on target / match4.17
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.18Shots per match13.25
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
3.73Shots on target4.17
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
8.9%Shot conversion9.4%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
41%Possession53%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
1.31xG for1.51
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
1.81xG against1.46
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

Shooting quality

Richmond Kickers: BalancedFort Wayne: Balanced
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
Accuracy (shots on target)33%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fort Wayne is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.4 pts / match - Fort Wayne

Richmond Kickers
WLDLL
Season result split
27% W18% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 at home
2-1-1
LWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Fort Wayne
DWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W50% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-2
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fort Wayne is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.25 goals / match - Fort Wayne

Fort Wayne is 55% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.55 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 1 goals / match - Fort Wayne

Richmond Kickers scoring profile: strong

Richmond Kickers scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Fort Wayne keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).

Fort Wayne scoring profile: very strong

Fort Wayne scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).

11Goals scored (season)15
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
17Goals conceded (season)12
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
2.55Average goals in match2.25
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
6Goals scored (last 5)6
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
10Goals conceded (last 5)4
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal75%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
27%2 goals33%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
9%3 goals17%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
0%4 goals0%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal67%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
36%2 goals33%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
18%3 goals0%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
9%4 goals0%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time17%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
27%Scored in both halves8%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
40%BTTS - last 580%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fort Wayne is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.33 pts / match - Fort Wayne

Richmond Kickers - half-time state
27% leading36% draw36% trailing
Fort Wayne - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.33
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
0.82Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.17
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
45%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
45%No goal before half-time58%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.08
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
55%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne
64%No goal after half-time58%
Richmond KickersFort Wayne

Richmond Kickers - second-half results

27% W27% R45% P
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fort Wayne - second-half results

33% W42% R25% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Richmond Kickers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Fort Wayne - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Richmond Kickers
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
3
3
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Fort Wayne
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
2
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
3
3
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Richmond Kickers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

Fort Wayne

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Richmond KickersLigaFort Wayne
Average goals in match 2.552.91 2.25
Both teams scored 45%58% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%59% 33%
Clean sheets 18%24% 33%
Goal before half-time 82%74% 75%
Goal after half-time 73%82% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.81
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+65%
Home attack advantage
+39%
Home defence advantage
+35%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Richmond KickersYellow cardDakota Barnathan
  2. Fort WayneGoalJack ThomasAssist: Taig Healy
  3. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Joshua Eric KirklandOff: Lucca Dourado Pereira
  4. Fort WayneGoalTaig HealyAssist: Jack Thomas
  5. Fort WayneYellow cardTiago Alexandre Soares Dias
  6. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Owen O'MalleyOff: Darwin Espinal
  7. Richmond KickersYellow cardAustin Amer
  8. Fort WayneYellow cardJavier Armas Pastor
  9. Fort WayneYellow cardJack Thomas
  10. Fort WayneSubstitutionOn: Jeremy GarayOff: Javier Armas Pastor
  11. Richmond KickersSubstitutionOn: Beckett HowellOff: Hayden Anderson
  12. Fort WayneYellow cardRyan Becher

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Richmond Kickers vs Fort Wayne?

The USL League One match finished Richmond Kickers 0:2 Fort Wayne. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Richmond Kickers vs Fort Wayne?

Richmond Kickers score 1.00 goals per game on average and Fort Wayne 1.25. The USL League One average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Richmond Kickers's matches and 50% of Fort Wayne's.

What form are Richmond Kickers and Fort Wayne in?

Over the last 5 games Richmond Kickers have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Fort Wayne 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Richmond Kickers vs Fort Wayne?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.