Richmond Kickers vs Portland Hearts of Pine: match statistics
Richmond Kickers vs Portland Hearts of Pine: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Richmond Kickers played Portland Hearts of Pine in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: City Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Richmond Kickers: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Portland Hearts of Pine: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Richmond Kickers scores 0.95 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Portland Hearts of Pine scores 1.48 and concedes 1.71. League average: 2.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Richmond Kickers 45%, Portland Hearts of Pine 76%. Over 2.5: Richmond Kickers 55%, Portland Hearts of Pine 67%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Portland Hearts of Pine has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.35. Richmond Kickers: 11.7 shots per match, Portland Hearts of Pine: 11.9.
Match halves
Richmond Kickers: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.35. Portland Hearts of Pine: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.95.
Goals by minute
Richmond Kickers: 0-15 (6 goals). Portland Hearts of Pine: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 4.33, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Richmond Kickers have a clearly stronger home profile: they win 44% of their matches, while Portland Hearts of Pine claim victory away from home in just 20% of cases. The hosts concede an average of 1.11 goals per home game, compared with as many as 2.20 for the visitors away from home, while Portland have kept a clean sheet in only 10% of their matches. Richmond create chances worth an average of 1.57 xG at their own stadium and register 13.44 shots per game, whereas Portland’s defence allows opponents 2.03 xG. Both teams are in poor current form, but Portland have lost 4 of their last 5 matches and scored just 6 goals in those games, strengthening the case for a cautious home-side pick.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are clearly high: 80% for Richmond and 70% for Portland, compared with the league average of 56%. Neither defense keeps clean sheets regularly, with both teams doing so in just 10% of matches, while Portland concedes an average of 2.2 goals per game. Richmond creates chances worth an average of 1.70 xG at home and records 4.4 shots on target per match, which should expose the weakness of an opponent whose average xG conceded stands at 2.03. On the visitors’ side, 1.24 xG and the fact that Richmond allows opponents 1.64 xG support the case for a goal, although the hosts’ last five matches, with only 0.4 goals per game, reduce confidence in the selection. Despite Richmond’s weaker recent attacking output, the very low clean-sheet prospects for both defenses give a slight edge to the scenario in which both teams score — BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonally, at least 2 goals were scored in 90% of Richmond’s matches and 80% of Portland’s games, clearly supporting the Over 1.5 goals line. Portland concedes an average of 2.2 goals per match, with an average xG conceded of 2.03, while Richmond generates 1.70 xG at home and averages 14.6 shots. The visitors should also create chances, as Richmond allows opponents an average of 1.64 xG over the season and has conceded 1.8 goals per game across its last 5 matches. Caution with higher lines is warranted due to the hosts’ current finishing form, having scored just 2 goals in their last five appearances, but the projected total of 2.75 goals still provides the strongest edge for Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw is the most likely outcome, as Portland were level at the break in 44% of their matches and Richmond in 30%, with low average first-half goal figures: 0.50 for the hosts and 0.33 for the visitors. The current form also points to a cautious opening: Richmond have failed to score before half-time in each of their last five matches, while Portland have averaged just 0.25 goals. After the break, the advantage should shift towards the hosts, as Portland concede an average of as many as 1.67 goals in the second half compared with Richmond’s 0.60, and at least three goals have been scored after half-time in 67% of their matches. Richmond also have the higher xG, 1.70 versus 1.24, while Portland have won none of their last five games and lost four, further supporting the X/1 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Richmond Kickers | Portland Hearts of Pine | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Richmond Kickers is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Richmond Kickers · 0.4 pts / match - Portland Hearts of Pine
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Portland Hearts of Pine is 56% better for: goals scored per match.
0.95 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.48 goals / match - Portland Hearts of Pine
Portland Hearts of Pine is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.71 goals / match - Portland Hearts of Pine
Richmond Kickers scores in 60% of matches (12 of 20 matches), while Portland Hearts of Pine keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 matches).
Portland Hearts of Pine scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Richmond Kickers
Over / Under - Portland Hearts of Pine
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Portland Hearts of Pine is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.95 pts / match - Richmond Kickers · 1 pts / match - Portland Hearts of Pine
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Richmond Kickers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Portland Hearts of Pine - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Richmond Kickers
Portland Hearts of Pine
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Richmond Kickers | Liga | Portland Hearts of Pine | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.95 | 2.91 | ▲ 3.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 57% | ▲ 76% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 25% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 70% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 79% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Richmond Kickers 0 - 1 - 2 Portland Hearts of Pine. Average goals 4.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Richmond Kickers vs Portland Hearts of Pine?
The USL League One match finished Richmond Kickers 1:1 Portland Hearts of Pine. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Richmond Kickers and Portland Hearts of Pine?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Richmond Kickers won 0, Portland Hearts of Pine won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Richmond Kickers vs Portland Hearts of Pine?
Richmond Kickers score 0.95 goals per game on average and Portland Hearts of Pine 1.48. The USL League One average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Richmond Kickers's matches and 76% of Portland Hearts of Pine's.
What form are Richmond Kickers and Portland Hearts of Pine in?
Over the last 5 games Richmond Kickers have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Portland Hearts of Pine 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Richmond Kickers vs Portland Hearts of Pine?
The statistical background for Richmond Kickers vs Portland Hearts of Pine — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


