Richmond Kickers vs Sarasota Paradise: match statistics
Richmond Kickers vs Sarasota Paradise: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Richmond Kickers played Sarasota Paradise in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 3 July 2026. Venue: City Stadium. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Richmond Kickers: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Sarasota Paradise: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Richmond Kickers scores 0.92 and concedes 1.85 goals per match. Sarasota Paradise scores 1.06 and concedes 1.75. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Richmond Kickers 46%, Sarasota Paradise 56%. Over 2.5: Richmond Kickers 54%, Sarasota Paradise 56%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Sarasota Paradise has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.34. Richmond Kickers: 11.4 shots per match, Sarasota Paradise: 12.1.
Match halves
Richmond Kickers: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.38. Sarasota Paradise: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
Richmond Kickers: 0-15 (3 goals). Sarasota Paradise: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1) because Richmond generates more chances at home than Sarasota do away — on average 14 attempts and 4.8 on-target shots at home versus 10.14 attempts and 3.14 on-target for guests on the road. Defensively the hosts also look better on the season: Richmond concedes 1.2 goals per home match, while Sarasota concedes 2.29 goals away and scores only 0.71 goals per away match. Quality of chances analysis shows a home advantage: Richmond has 1.59 xG at home, Sarasota 1.24 xG away, suggesting the hosts create more high-value chances despite similar xG against (1.67 for Richmond vs 1.47 for Sarasota). Forms are mixed — Richmond have 0 points in their last 5 overall (5 defeats), but at home in their last 5 they are L-W-W-D-L (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses), while Sarasota have scored 8 goals and won 3 of their last 5 (PPG 1.8). Considering the greater number of shots on target, higher xG for the hosts and Sarasota’s very poor away stats (14% away wins, 86% defeats and -11 goal difference), I assign Richmond a 60% chance to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes with a 65% probability, because hosts Richmond have a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% versus Sarasota's 43%, and the league average is 56%, which biases toward both teams scoring. Both sides have weak defenses: Richmond conceded 24 goals (1.33 per game), Sarasota 28 goals (2.29 per game), and xG indicates Richmond generates 1.57 xG, Sarasota 1.24 xG, with xG against of 1.29 and 1.47 respectively, so there are sufficient chances for goals from both teams. Although Richmond in the last 5 matches have scored only 0.4 goals and conceded 2.4, with recent BTTS at 40%, Sarasota in the last 5 average 1.6 scored and 1.6 conceded with 60% BTTS, which partially offsets the hosts' current drought. Additionally the hosts register 5.0 on-target shots from 13.67 total shots per game versus Sarasota's 3.14 on-target from 10.14, and have a higher conversion rate 10% vs 7%, increasing the likelihood of both teams finding the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I predict Over 1.5 as the best bet — expected total goals 2.79 (1.52 for Richmond Kickers and 1.27 for Sarasota Paradise), which gives a high probability of at least 2 goals. Both teams have a high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals this season: Richmond 78% and Sarasota 86%, and the league averages 2.9 goals per game, further supporting the Over scenario. Goal potential is confirmed by xG values: home 1.57 xG, away 1.24 xG; at the same time the home side concedes 1.29 xG on average and the visitors 1.47 xG, yielding the calculated 1.52 and 1.27 xG respectively. Richmond averages 13.67 shots (5.0 on target) with a conversion rate of 10%, Sarasota 10.14 shots (3.14 on target) with a 7% conversion, so the hosts’ offense should create chances and contribute to raising the goal total. Consequently I estimate probabilities of Over 1.5 at 78%, Over 2.5 at 53% and Over 3.5 at 31%, therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely Half-Time outcome is a draw — the home side are level at the break in 56% of matches and the visitors in 57%, so HT is expected to be a draw. After the break the hosts have the greater chances: they average 0.89 goals in the second half versus 0.57 for Sarasota and have collected 12 points in second halves compared to the visitors' 4 points, which favors the home side in the closing phase. Seasonal numbers also support Richmond — 1.33 goals scored per game and xG 1.57 versus 0.71 and xG 1.24 for the opponents, and 5.0 shots on target versus 3.14 confirm the attacking superiority. Although the visitors are in better form over the last 5 matches (60% wins vs 0% for the hosts), their overall win rate is only 14% and they concede 2.29 goals per game on average, so their chance of a full-time victory is limited. For these reasons the strongest signal is a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1), therefore I recommend this option as the primary pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Richmond Kickers | Sarasota Paradise | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sarasota Paradise is 800% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.8 pts / match - Sarasota Paradise
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sarasota Paradise is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
0.92 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.06 goals / match - Sarasota Paradise
Sarasota Paradise is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.85 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.75 goals / match - Sarasota Paradise
Richmond Kickers scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Sarasota Paradise keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
Sarasota Paradise scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Richmond Kickers
Over / Under - Sarasota Paradise
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Richmond Kickers is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Richmond Kickers · 0.94 pts / match - Sarasota Paradise
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Richmond Kickers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Sarasota Paradise - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Richmond Kickers
Sarasota Paradise
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Richmond Kickers | Liga | Sarasota Paradise | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.77 | 2.92 | ▼ 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 58% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 54% | 59% | ▼ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 24% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 74% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 81% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Richmond Kickers vs Sarasota Paradise?
The USL League One match finished Richmond Kickers 0:0 Sarasota Paradise. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Richmond Kickers vs Sarasota Paradise?
Richmond Kickers score 0.92 goals per game on average and Sarasota Paradise 1.06. The USL League One average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Richmond Kickers's matches and 56% of Sarasota Paradise's.
What form are Richmond Kickers and Sarasota Paradise in?
Over the last 5 games Richmond Kickers have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Sarasota Paradise 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Richmond Kickers vs Sarasota Paradise?
The statistical background for Richmond Kickers vs Sarasota Paradise — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


