Richmond Kickers vs Spokane Velocity: match statistics
Richmond Kickers vs Spokane Velocity: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Richmond Kickers played Spokane Velocity in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Venue: City Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Richmond Kickers: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Spokane Velocity: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Richmond Kickers scores 0.80 and concedes 1.87 goals per match. Spokane Velocity scores 1.13 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.83 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Richmond Kickers 40%, Spokane Velocity 47%. Over 2.5: Richmond Kickers 53%, Spokane Velocity 60%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Spokane Velocity has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.25. Richmond Kickers: 10.8 shots per match, Spokane Velocity: 11.9.
Match halves
Richmond Kickers: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.33. Spokane Velocity: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Richmond Kickers: 0-15 (3 goals). Spokane Velocity: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1): Richmond produces more high-quality chances at home — averaging 4.17 shots on target and xG 1.48 from 13.17 total shots with a 6% conversion rate, translating to 0.83 goals scored per game. Spokane struggle on the road with finishing: only 0.33 goals per away match, xG 1.35, a 3% conversion rate and 67% of away games goalless for them; additionally they have no away wins (0% victories). Defensively, Richmond concede 1.00 goal at home on average (xG against 1.62), while Spokane concede 1.83 goals away (xG against 1.37), indicating greater susceptibility of the visitors to concede. In form over the last five matches the visitors average 1.2 points per game versus 0.8 for the hosts, but Spokane’s away record (goal difference away -9 and 67% away losses) lowers their realistic chances. Based on this I favor Richmond, a draw is possible, and an away win for Spokane is unlikely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Analysis indicates a higher probability of BTTS: seasonal BTTS rate is 56% for Richmond and 33% for Spokane, with the league BTTS average at 55%. In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 40%, showing a moderate short-term tendency for goal exchange. Richmond averages 1.67 goals on the season, although only 0.6 in the last 5, and opponents generated xG 1.87 against them in that period, while Spokane has a season scoring average of 0.33, but scored 1.0 in the last 5 and their xG in the last 5 is 1.43 — this indicates both sides create chances and are vulnerable to conceding. A counterargument is Spokane’s low season efficiency: shot conversion rate only 3% and a gap between xG 1.35 and actual average 0.33, which reduces confidence in their scoring. Considering Richmond’s 56% BTTS, the league 55% and the high goals conceded averages in the last 5 (2.4 for Richmond and 2.0 for Spokane), I assign a 65% chance to BTTS - Yes and 35% to No and recommend a pick: yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model indicates 1.43 xG for Richmond Kickers and 1.35 xG for Spokane Velocity, totaling 2.78 xG — a value very close to the league average of 2.83 goals per game. Richmond averages 1.67 goals per game this season with 11.89 shots and a conversion rate of 14%, while Spokane averages 0.33 goals with 12.0 shots and a 3% conversion, so the home side creates and converts more chances. In the last 5 matches Richmond concedes an average of 2.4 goals and Spokane 2.0, and the percentage of matches over 2.5 is 67% for Richmond and 50% for Spokane this season (in the last 5 matches 60% and 80% respectively), which increases the probability of goals from both sides. Over 3.5 is much rarer (seasonally 44% for the hosts and 17% for the guests), therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over, and the best value to play is Over 1.5. I estimate the probability of over>1.5 at 86%, over>2.5 at 63% and over>3.5 at 28%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1). The home side win 78% of matches this season versus 0% for the visitors, while at half-time the home side led in 3 of 9 matches (33%) and the score was level in 4 of 9 (44%), so a half-time draw appears more frequent than an away lead. The key is second-half performance: the hosts average 0.78 goals in the second half and earn 1.89 points after the break, whereas the visitors have 0.0 goals and 0.17 points in the second half, which increases the likelihood that Richmond will overturn the score or take the lead after half-time. Despite similar xG (1.43 for the home side vs 1.35 for the visitors) the hosts convert much better (14% vs 3%), which further supports goals for Richmond in the second half. For these reasons the X/1 outcome is assigned the highest probability (30%), 1/1 is a realistic alternative (25%), and the remaining scenarios are considered relatively unlikely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Richmond Kickers | Spokane Velocity | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Spokane Velocity is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Richmond Kickers · 0.6 pts / match - Spokane Velocity
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Spokane Velocity is 41% better for: goals scored per match.
0.8 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.13 goals / match - Spokane Velocity
Spokane Velocity is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.87 goals / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.4 goals / match - Spokane Velocity
Richmond Kickers scores in 53% of matches (8 of 15 matches), while Spokane Velocity keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
Spokane Velocity scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Richmond Kickers keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Richmond Kickers
Over / Under - Spokane Velocity
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Spokane Velocity is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Richmond Kickers · 1.4 pts / match - Spokane Velocity
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Richmond Kickers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Spokane Velocity - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Richmond Kickers
Spokane Velocity
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Richmond Kickers | Liga | Spokane Velocity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.67 | 2.83 | ▼ 2.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 55% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 58% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 25% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 72% | • 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 81% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Richmond Kickers 0 - 0 - 3 Spokane Velocity. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Richmond Kickers vs Spokane Velocity?
The USL League One match finished Richmond Kickers 0:2 Spokane Velocity. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Richmond Kickers and Spokane Velocity?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Richmond Kickers won 0, Spokane Velocity won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Richmond Kickers vs Spokane Velocity?
Richmond Kickers score 0.80 goals per game on average and Spokane Velocity 1.13. The USL League One average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Richmond Kickers's matches and 47% of Spokane Velocity's.
What form are Richmond Kickers and Spokane Velocity in?
Over the last 5 games Richmond Kickers have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Spokane Velocity 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Richmond Kickers vs Spokane Velocity?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.