Ried vs Wolfsberger AC: match statistics
Ried vs Wolfsberger AC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ried played Wolfsberger AC in Bundesliga (Austria). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Ried: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Wolfsberger AC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ried scores 1.27 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Wolfsberger AC scores 1.27 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ried 53%, Wolfsberger AC 60%. Over 2.5: Ried 47%, Wolfsberger AC 60%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Ried has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.26. Ried: 12.1 shots per match, Wolfsberger AC: 11.1.
Match halves
Ried: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Wolfsberger AC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Ried: 31-45+ (10 goals). Wolfsberger AC: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Bundesliga: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a Ried win (1). At home Ried averages 1.4 goals scored and concedes only 1.13 per match, with xG 1.47 versus xG against 1.22, indicating superiority in the quality of created chances and greater defensive stability. Wolfsberger AC away averages 1.33 goals scored but concedes 1.8 goals, records only 7% clean sheets and as much as 60% losses on the road, highlighting clear problems away from home. Both teams have 38 goals in the season and 5 goals in the last 5 matches, but Ried attempts more shots per match (13.07 vs 10.73) and has higher xG (1.47 vs 1.27), which gives them better prospects of converting their advantage. Therefore I assign a 65% probability to a Ried win, 20% to a draw and 15% to a Wolfsberger win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators favor BTTS: Ried has BTTS 53% and Wolfsberger 67%, the pair average is around 60% which exceeds the league value of 56%. Both teams have similar xG (1.26 for Ried vs 1.27 for Wolfsberger) and seasonal goals per game 1.2 and 1.33; however Wolfsberger concedes an average of 1.8 goals and has only 7% clean sheets, which increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Contradictory signals come from form: in the last 5 matches BTTS dropped to 40% (Ried) and 20% (Wolfsberger), and both sides in this run averaged 1.0 goals scored and conceded 0.6 and 0.8 respectively, which lowers the projected BTTS share. Considering the seasonal BTTS advantage (avg ~60%), similar xG and Wolfsberger’s high goals conceded rate (1.8 + 7% clean sheets), I assign a higher probability to BTTS - Yes at 58% versus 42% No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects a total of approximately 2.69 goals: attacking xG for Ried is 1.26 and for Wolfsberger 1.27, while defensive xG against are 1.34 (Ried) and 1.52 (Wolfsberger), which translates to ~1.39 expected goals for Ried and ~1.30 for Wolfsberger. With a sum of 2.69 the Poisson distribution yields ~75% probability for Over 1.5 goals, about 50% for Over 2.5 and ~28% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Season data confirm a tendency toward goalscoring matches: Wolfsberger have 93% of matches with Over 1.5 and 67% with Over 2.5, while Ried are 67% and 53% respectively (league average Over 2.5 is 51%). Additionally both teams have a high share of BTTS matches: Ried 53% and Wolfsberger 67%, and Wolfsberger keep clean sheets in only 7% of games, which increases the risk of goals from both sides, so the best pick is Over 1.5 with projected 1.39–1.30 goals and estimated Over 1.5 ≈75%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a half-time draw with a home victory (HT/FT X/1), because Ried drew at the break in 53% of matches, conceding only 0.33 goals on average by half-time and not conceding any goals before the break in their last five games. Ried improve after the break — they collected 19 points in second halves and have 1.27 points per game after half-time, whereas Wolfsberger have only 9 points and 0.6 PPG in second halves. Wolfsberger have a 60% loss rate this season and concede 1.8 goals per match on average, which increases the risk of them losing a lead in the second half. The xG of both teams is similar (1.26 for Ried vs 1.27 for Wolfsberger), but the visitors allow more xG against (1.52 versus 1.34), which supports the view that the home side is more likely to create the decisive situations after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ried | Wolfsberger AC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ried is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.3 goals / match - Ried · 1.4 goals / match - Wolfsberger AC
Ried scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Wolfsberger AC keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).
Wolfsberger AC scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Ried keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ried
Over / Under - Wolfsberger AC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wolfsberger AC is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / match - Ried · 1.47 pts / match - Wolfsberger AC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ried - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wolfsberger AC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ried
Wolfsberger AC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).
Teams vs league
| Ried | Liga | Wolfsberger AC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.57 | 2.69 | • 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 51% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 25% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | • 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Ried 2 - 1 - 0 Wolfsberger AC. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ried vs Wolfsberger AC?
The Bundesliga match finished Ried 0:1 Wolfsberger AC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ried and Wolfsberger AC?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ried won 2, Wolfsberger AC won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ried vs Wolfsberger AC?
Ried score 1.27 goals per game on average and Wolfsberger AC 1.27. The Bundesliga average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Ried's matches and 60% of Wolfsberger AC's.
What form are Ried and Wolfsberger AC in?
Over the last 5 games Ried have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Wolfsberger AC 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ried vs Wolfsberger AC?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ried vs Wolfsberger AC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


