Austria - BundesligaData current as of 12 September 2026

Ried vs Wolfsberger AC: match statistics

Ried crest
Ried
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Wolfsberger AC crest
Wolfsberger AC

Ried vs Wolfsberger AC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ried played Wolfsberger AC in Bundesliga (Austria). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Ried: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Wolfsberger AC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ried scores 1.27 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Wolfsberger AC scores 1.27 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ried 53%, Wolfsberger AC 60%. Over 2.5: Ried 47%, Wolfsberger AC 60%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Ried has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.26. Ried: 12.1 shots per match, Wolfsberger AC: 11.1.

Match halves

Ried: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Wolfsberger AC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Ried: 31-45+ (10 goals). Wolfsberger AC: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Bundesliga: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a Ried win (1). At home Ried averages 1.4 goals scored and concedes only 1.13 per match, with xG 1.47 versus xG against 1.22, indicating superiority in the quality of created chances and greater defensive stability. Wolfsberger AC away averages 1.33 goals scored but concedes 1.8 goals, records only 7% clean sheets and as much as 60% losses on the road, highlighting clear problems away from home. Both teams have 38 goals in the season and 5 goals in the last 5 matches, but Ried attempts more shots per match (13.07 vs 10.73) and has higher xG (1.47 vs 1.27), which gives them better prospects of converting their advantage. Therefore I assign a 65% probability to a Ried win, 20% to a draw and 15% to a Wolfsberger win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal indicators favor BTTS: Ried has BTTS 53% and Wolfsberger 67%, the pair average is around 60% which exceeds the league value of 56%. Both teams have similar xG (1.26 for Ried vs 1.27 for Wolfsberger) and seasonal goals per game 1.2 and 1.33; however Wolfsberger concedes an average of 1.8 goals and has only 7% clean sheets, which increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Contradictory signals come from form: in the last 5 matches BTTS dropped to 40% (Ried) and 20% (Wolfsberger), and both sides in this run averaged 1.0 goals scored and conceded 0.6 and 0.8 respectively, which lowers the projected BTTS share. Considering the seasonal BTTS advantage (avg ~60%), similar xG and Wolfsberger’s high goals conceded rate (1.8 + 7% clean sheets), I assign a higher probability to BTTS - Yes at 58% versus 42% No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model projects a total of approximately 2.69 goals: attacking xG for Ried is 1.26 and for Wolfsberger 1.27, while defensive xG against are 1.34 (Ried) and 1.52 (Wolfsberger), which translates to ~1.39 expected goals for Ried and ~1.30 for Wolfsberger. With a sum of 2.69 the Poisson distribution yields ~75% probability for Over 1.5 goals, about 50% for Over 2.5 and ~28% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Season data confirm a tendency toward goalscoring matches: Wolfsberger have 93% of matches with Over 1.5 and 67% with Over 2.5, while Ried are 67% and 53% respectively (league average Over 2.5 is 51%). Additionally both teams have a high share of BTTS matches: Ried 53% and Wolfsberger 67%, and Wolfsberger keep clean sheets in only 7% of games, which increases the risk of goals from both sides, so the best pick is Over 1.5 with projected 1.39–1.30 goals and estimated Over 1.5 ≈75%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a half-time draw with a home victory (HT/FT X/1), because Ried drew at the break in 53% of matches, conceding only 0.33 goals on average by half-time and not conceding any goals before the break in their last five games. Ried improve after the break — they collected 19 points in second halves and have 1.27 points per game after half-time, whereas Wolfsberger have only 9 points and 0.6 PPG in second halves. Wolfsberger have a 60% loss rate this season and concede 1.8 goals per match on average, which increases the risk of them losing a lead in the second half. The xG of both teams is similar (1.26 for Ried vs 1.27 for Wolfsberger), but the visitors allow more xG against (1.52 versus 1.34), which supports the view that the home side is more likely to create the decisive situations after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
RiedWolfsberger AC
8Shots12
RiedWolfsberger AC
2Shots on target6
RiedWolfsberger AC
0.95xG1.39
RiedWolfsberger AC
7Corners5
RiedWolfsberger AC
42Dangerous attacks29
RiedWolfsberger AC
17Fouls17
RiedWolfsberger AC
2Cards2
RiedWolfsberger AC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.27Goals scored / match1.27
RiedWolfsberger AC
1.3Goals conceded / match1.4
RiedWolfsberger AC
49%Average possession51%
RiedWolfsberger AC
3.77Shots on target / match3.67
RiedWolfsberger AC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.13Shots per match11.07
RiedWolfsberger AC
3.77Shots on target3.67
RiedWolfsberger AC
10.4%Shot conversion11.4%
RiedWolfsberger AC
49%Possession51%
RiedWolfsberger AC
1.35xG for1.26
RiedWolfsberger AC
1.39xG against1.43
RiedWolfsberger AC

Shooting quality

Ried: BalancedWolfsberger AC: Balanced
RiedWolfsberger AC
Accuracy (shots on target)31%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ried
DDWLW
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-12
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-4
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Wolfsberger AC
DDLWW
Season result split
30% W27% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-13
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-9
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ried is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.3 goals / match - Ried · 1.4 goals / match - Wolfsberger AC

Ried scoring profile: very strong

Ried scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Wolfsberger AC keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).

Wolfsberger AC scoring profile: very strong

Wolfsberger AC scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Ried keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).

38Goals scored (season)38
RiedWolfsberger AC
39Goals conceded (season)42
RiedWolfsberger AC
2.57Average goals in match2.67
RiedWolfsberger AC
5Goals scored (last 5)5
RiedWolfsberger AC
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
RiedWolfsberger AC

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal73%
RiedWolfsberger AC
47%2 goals33%
RiedWolfsberger AC
10%3 goals17%
RiedWolfsberger AC
0%4 goals3%
RiedWolfsberger AC

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal77%
RiedWolfsberger AC
37%2 goals50%
RiedWolfsberger AC
13%3 goals13%
RiedWolfsberger AC
3%4 goals0%
RiedWolfsberger AC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time27%
RiedWolfsberger AC
3%BTTS in both halves3%
RiedWolfsberger AC
23%Scored in both halves20%
RiedWolfsberger AC

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
RiedWolfsberger AC
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
RiedWolfsberger AC
40%BTTS - last 520%
RiedWolfsberger AC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
RiedWolfsberger AC
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
RiedWolfsberger AC
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
RiedWolfsberger AC

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
RiedWolfsberger AC
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
RiedWolfsberger AC
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
RiedWolfsberger AC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wolfsberger AC is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Ried · 1.47 pts / match - Wolfsberger AC

Ried - half-time state
33% leading40% draw27% trailing
Wolfsberger AC - half-time state
33% leading47% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)1.47
RiedWolfsberger AC
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.8
RiedWolfsberger AC
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
RiedWolfsberger AC
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.3
RiedWolfsberger AC
67%Clean sheet before half-time53%
RiedWolfsberger AC
53%No goal before half-time47%
RiedWolfsberger AC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)0.93
RiedWolfsberger AC
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
RiedWolfsberger AC
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.9
RiedWolfsberger AC
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.37
RiedWolfsberger AC
40%Clean sheet after half-time40%
RiedWolfsberger AC
53%No goal after half-time60%
RiedWolfsberger AC

Ried - second-half results

33% W27% D40% L
42
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Wolfsberger AC - second-half results

20% W33% D47% L
44
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ried - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Wolfsberger AC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ried
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
7
16-30
10
5
31-45
6
7
46-60
5
8
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Wolfsberger AC
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
8
6
16-30
8
5
31-45
3
3
46-60
3
11
61-75
8
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.62
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ried

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Wolfsberger AC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).

Teams vs league

RiedLigaWolfsberger AC
Average goals in match 2.572.69 2.67
Both teams scored 53%56% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%51% 60%
Clean sheets 23%25% 23%
Goal before half-time 67%73% 73%
Goal after half-time 87%77% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Wolfsberger ACGoalAlessandro Schöpf
  2. Wolfsberger ACSubstitutionOn: Dejan ZukićOff: Donis Xhemë Avdijaj
  3. Wolfsberger ACYellow cardFabian Wohlmuth
  4. RiedSubstitutionOn: Martin RasnerOff: Jonas Mayer
  5. Wolfsberger ACYellow cardNikolas Polster
  6. RiedSubstitutionOn: Antonio Van WykOff: Nicolas Bajlicz
  7. Wolfsberger ACSubstitutionOn: Erik KojzekOff: Markus Pink
  8. Wolfsberger ACSubstitutionOn: Boris MatićOff: Rene Renner
  9. RiedSubstitutionOn: Saliou SanéOff: Yussef Nasrawe
  10. RiedYellow cardNikki Havenaar
  11. RiedYellow cardAndreas Leitner

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jakob SemlerMatches officiated: 10
3.8Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 260%Home wins10%Draws30%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Ried 2 - 1 - 0 Wolfsberger AC. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ried vs Wolfsberger AC?

The Bundesliga match finished Ried 0:1 Wolfsberger AC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ried and Wolfsberger AC?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ried won 2, Wolfsberger AC won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ried vs Wolfsberger AC?

Ried score 1.27 goals per game on average and Wolfsberger AC 1.27. The Bundesliga average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Ried's matches and 60% of Wolfsberger AC's.

What form are Ried and Wolfsberger AC in?

Over the last 5 games Ried have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Wolfsberger AC 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ried vs Wolfsberger AC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ried vs Wolfsberger AC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.