Latvia - 1. LigaSporta komplekss ĶeizarmežsData current as of 07 September 2026

Riga FC II vs Smiltene: match statistics

Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Smiltene crest
Smiltene

Riga FC II vs Smiltene: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga FC II played Smiltene in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Riga FC II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Smiltene: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga FC II scores 1.33 and concedes 2.33 goals per match. Smiltene scores 1.00 and concedes 2.78. League average: 3.51 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga FC II 67%, Smiltene 44%. Over 2.5: Riga FC II 78%, Smiltene 56%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.

xG, shots and style

Riga FC II has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.07. Riga FC II: 7.7 shots per match, Smiltene: 8.1.

Match halves

Riga FC II: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.44. Smiltene: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

Riga FC II: 0-15 (3 goals). Smiltene: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.51 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1). Riga FC II averages 1.75 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.41 and a shot conversion rate of 18%, while Smiltene scores 0.8 goals away with xG 1.06 and a 10% conversion, giving the hosts a clear offensive edge. The hosts register 6.25 shots on target and 10 attempts per home game versus Smiltene’s 3.6 on target and 8.4 attempts, and they find the net in 75% of home matches while the visitors fail to score in 60% of away fixtures. Defensively Smiltene concedes 3.4 goals away and Riga concedes 2.5 at home, suggesting more scoring opportunities for the hosts and an open, goal-prone match. Over the last 5 games Riga scored 9 goals and averages 1.2 points per game versus Smiltene’s 8 goals and 0.8 points per game; therefore I assign 60% probability to a home win, 25% to a draw and 15% to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I pick 'BTTS - Yes' because the league features 63% BTTS matches and an average of 3.45 goals per game, which favors both teams scoring. Riga FC II averages 1.25 goals scored and concedes 2.0, while Smiltene scores 0.8 and concedes 3.4 on the season, indicating weak defenses on both sides. In the last 5 matches both teams registered BTTS in 60%; the home side in the last 5 scored 1.8 and conceded 2.4, and the visitors scored 1.6 and conceded 1.6, so recent form increases the likelihood of mutual goals. xG confirms balanced attacking potential at 1.08 versus 1.06 and high defensive exposure at 2.04 versus 2.43, therefore I rate BTTS at 70% versus 30% for 'No Goal'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate Riga FC II will score about 1.76 goals and Smiltene about 1.55, totaling ~3.31 goals. These values result from averaging attacking xG (Riga 1.08 vs Smiltene 1.06) and opponent defensive xG allowed (Smiltene concedes 2.43, Riga 2.04), which translates into expected 1.76 and 1.55. Season statistics confirm a tendency for goals: Over 1.5 occurred in 75% of Riga’s matches and 80% of Smiltene’s matches, the league averages 3.45 goals per game, and seasonOver0.5 is 75%/100%. Using a Poisson model with a mean of 3.31, the probability of Over 1.5 is about 84%, Over 2.5 about 64%, and Over 3.5 about 42%, so the strongest signal is an Over at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Neither team has a win this season (0% wins for the home side and 0% for the visitors), while draws occur frequently: the home team draws in 50% of matches and the visitors in 40%, which strongly favors a full-time draw. Half-time draws are also common (draw at the break: 50% for the home side and 40% for the visitors), and xG of 1.08 (Riga II) versus 1.06 (Smiltene) together with a similar number of on-target shots (3.0 vs 3.6) indicate an evenly matched first half. Although in the last five matches the home side averaged 1.0 goals by half-time compared to 0.2 for the visitors, the visitors’ lower finishing efficiency (10% conversion versus 16% for the home side) and the high share of seasonal draws tilt the scenario toward draw/draw (X/X). Additionally, the second half is goal-active (over 0.5 in the second half: 75% for the home side and 100% for the visitors) and defenses are weak (home concede 2.0 goals on average, visitors 3.4), which increases the likelihood of a points split.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

71Possession (%)29
Riga FC IISmiltene
14Shots6
Riga FC IISmiltene
8Shots on target0
Riga FC IISmiltene
2.11xG0.75
Riga FC IISmiltene
5Corners4
Riga FC IISmiltene
91Dangerous attacks50
Riga FC IISmiltene
14Fouls6
Riga FC IISmiltene
0Cards0
Riga FC IISmiltene

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Riga FC IISmiltene
1.33Goals scored / match1
Riga FC IISmiltene
2.33Goals conceded / match2.78
Riga FC IISmiltene
43%Average possession42%
Riga FC IISmiltene
4.22Shots on target / match3.33
Riga FC IISmiltene

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.67Shots per match8.11
Riga FC IISmiltene
4.22Shots on target3.33
Riga FC IISmiltene
17.4%Shot conversion12.3%
Riga FC IISmiltene
43%Possession42%
Riga FC IISmiltene
1.25xG for1.07
Riga FC IISmiltene
1.95xG against2.25
Riga FC IISmiltene

Shooting quality

Riga FC II: Counter-attackingSmiltene: Counter-attacking
Riga FC IISmiltene
Accuracy (shots on target)55%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga FC II is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Riga FC II · 0.2 pts / match - Smiltene

Riga FC II
WLLLL
Season result split
22% W11% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-6
0.78 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 at home
2-0-2
LWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.90BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Smiltene
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W44% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-5
0.44 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 2.35BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga FC II is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Riga FC II · 1 goals / match - Smiltene

Riga FC II is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.33 goals / match - Riga FC II · 2.78 goals / match - Smiltene

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Smiltene keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).

Smiltene scoring profile: strong

Smiltene scores in 44% of matches (4 of 9 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 9 matches).

12Goals scored (season)9
Riga FC IISmiltene
21Goals conceded (season)25
Riga FC IISmiltene
3.67Average goals in match3.78
Riga FC IISmiltene
7Goals scored (last 5)3
Riga FC IISmiltene
13Goals conceded (last 5)15
Riga FC IISmiltene

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal44%
Riga FC IISmiltene
44%2 goals33%
Riga FC IISmiltene
11%3 goals22%
Riga FC IISmiltene
11%4 goals0%
Riga FC IISmiltene

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal89%
Riga FC IISmiltene
89%2 goals67%
Riga FC IISmiltene
33%3 goals56%
Riga FC IISmiltene
11%4 goals22%
Riga FC IISmiltene

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time11%
Riga FC IISmiltene
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Riga FC IISmiltene
33%Scored in both halves11%
Riga FC IISmiltene

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Riga FC IISmiltene
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
Riga FC IISmiltene
60%BTTS - last 540%
Riga FC IISmiltene

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Riga FC IISmiltene
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Riga FC IISmiltene
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
Riga FC IISmiltene

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Riga FC IISmiltene
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Riga FC IISmiltene
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time44%
Riga FC IISmiltene

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 202% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Riga FC II · 0.44 pts / match - Smiltene

Riga FC II - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Smiltene - half-time state
0% leading44% draw56% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)0.44
Riga FC IISmiltene
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.11
Riga FC IISmiltene
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)1.33
Riga FC IISmiltene
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.44
Riga FC IISmiltene
44%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Riga FC IISmiltene
44%No goal before half-time89%
Riga FC IISmiltene

After half-time (2nd half)

0.56Points per match (2nd half)1.22
Riga FC IISmiltene
0.44Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
Riga FC IISmiltene
1.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.44
Riga FC IISmiltene
2.11Average goals (2nd half)2.33
Riga FC IISmiltene
22%Clean sheet after half-time22%
Riga FC IISmiltene
56%No goal after half-time56%
Riga FC IISmiltene

Riga FC II - second-half results

11% W22% R67% P
12
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 22%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Smiltene - second-half results

33% W22% R44% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.44
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.20
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.22.4
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+3-9
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Smiltene - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.61.4
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-7-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Smiltene
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
0
4
16-30
1
5
31-45
3
4
46-60
1
3
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.72
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Smiltene

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Riga FC IILigaSmiltene
Average goals in match 3.673.51 3.78
Both teams scored 67%63% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 78%70% 56%
Clean sheets 0%22% 11%
Goal before half-time 78%69% 56%
Goal after half-time 89%84% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.51
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.97
Home goals / match
1.54
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
39%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Markuss Eduards Blaubergs⚽ 1
Nazar Prudchenko⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Riga FC IIGoalNazar Prudchenko
  2. Riga FC IIGoalMarkuss Eduards Blaubergs

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Riga FC II 0 - 0 - 2 Smiltene. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Riga FC II
0 : 2
FK Smiltene BJSS
FK Smiltene BJSS
5 : 1
Riga FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Riga FC II vs Smiltene?

The 1. Liga match finished Riga FC II 2:0 Smiltene. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga FC II and Smiltene?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Riga FC II won 0, Smiltene won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga FC II vs Smiltene?

Riga FC II score 1.33 goals per game on average and Smiltene 1.00. The 1. Liga average is 3.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Riga FC II's matches and 44% of Smiltene's.

What form are Riga FC II and Smiltene in?

Over the last 5 games Riga FC II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Smiltene 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga FC II vs Smiltene?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.