Latvia - 1. LigaSporta komplekss ĶeizarmežsData current as of 23 July 2026

Riga FC II vs Tukums II: match statistics

Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Tukums II crest
Tukums II

Riga FC II vs Tukums II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga FC II play Tukums II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 4 July 2026 at 12:00. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Riga FC II: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Tukums II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga FC II scores 1.62 and concedes 1.77 goals per match. Tukums II scores 1.38 and concedes 2.38. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga FC II 62%, Tukums II 77%. Over 2.5: Riga FC II 69%, Tukums II 69%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Tukums II has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.36. Riga FC II: 8.2 shots per match, Tukums II: 10.5.

Match halves

Riga FC II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69. Tukums II: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.92.

Goals by minute

Riga FC II: 16-30 (5 goals). Tukums II: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Riga FC II are the favorites for this match: at home they win 60% of games, score on average 1.8 goals and concede 2.0 goals per match with average xG 1.55 for themselves and 1.8 for opponents. Tukums II on the road also average 1.8 goals scored, but concede as many as 3.2 goals away and have no clean sheets; in the last 5 matches the visitors conceded 15 goals (3.0 per match) versus the hosts’ 10 conceded (2.0 per match). The hosts register an average of 6.6 shots on target at home and convert 17% of their chances, while the visitors average 5.0 shots on target and 11% conversion, indicating higher finishing quality for Riga. Additionally, Riga controls the ball on average 56% of the time versus Tukums’ 48% and have a better points return over the last five matches (1.2 points vs 0.8), so they hold advantages in control and form. On this basis I forecast a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
Riga FC IITukums II
14Shots9
Riga FC IITukums II
10Shots on target5
Riga FC IITukums II
0xG0
Riga FC IITukums II
5Corners3
Riga FC IITukums II
0Dangerous attacks0
Riga FC IITukums II
-1Fouls-1
Riga FC IITukums II
-1Cards-1
Riga FC IITukums II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Riga FC IITukums II
1.62Goals scored / match1.38
Riga FC IITukums II
1.77Goals conceded / match2.38
Riga FC IITukums II
45%Average possession42%
Riga FC IITukums II
4.62Shots on target / match4.69
Riga FC IITukums II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.23Shots per match10.46
Riga FC IITukums II
4.62Shots on target4.69
Riga FC IITukums II
19.6%Shot conversion13.2%
Riga FC IITukums II
45%Possession42%
Riga FC IITukums II
1.36xG for1.57
Riga FC IITukums II
1.68xG against1.79
Riga FC IITukums II

Shooting quality

Riga FC II: Counter-attackingTukums II: Counter-attacking
Riga FC IITukums II
Accuracy (shots on target)56%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga FC II is 300% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Riga FC II · 0.6 pts / match - Tukums II

Riga FC II
LWWWW
Season result split
46% W8% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-6
1.46 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 0.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tukums II
LLLLW
Season result split
23% W15% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-8
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga FC II is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.62 goals / match - Riga FC II · 1.38 goals / match - Tukums II

Riga FC II is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.77 goals / match - Riga FC II · 2.38 goals / match - Tukums II

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

Tukums II scoring profile: very strong

Tukums II scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

21Goals scored (season)18
Riga FC IITukums II
23Goals conceded (season)31
Riga FC IITukums II
3.38Average goals in match3.77
Riga FC IITukums II
10Goals scored (last 5)5
Riga FC IITukums II
4Goals conceded (last 5)15
Riga FC IITukums II

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal92%
Riga FC IITukums II
62%2 goals31%
Riga FC IITukums II
15%3 goals8%
Riga FC IITukums II
8%4 goals8%
Riga FC IITukums II

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal85%
Riga FC IITukums II
62%2 goals69%
Riga FC IITukums II
23%3 goals46%
Riga FC IITukums II
8%4 goals23%
Riga FC IITukums II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time31%
Riga FC IITukums II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Riga FC IITukums II
38%Scored in both halves15%
Riga FC IITukums II

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS69%
Riga FC IITukums II
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Riga FC IITukums II
60%BTTS - last 560%
Riga FC IITukums II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Riga FC IITukums II
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Riga FC IITukums II
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
Riga FC IITukums II

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Riga FC IITukums II
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
Riga FC IITukums II
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Riga FC IITukums II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.54 pts / match - Riga FC II · 0.77 pts / match - Tukums II

Riga FC II - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing
Tukums II - half-time state
15% leading31% draw54% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.54Points per match (1st half)0.77
Riga FC IITukums II
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.46
Riga FC IITukums II
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)1.08
Riga FC IITukums II
1.54Average goals (1st half)1.54
Riga FC IITukums II
46%Clean sheet before half-time31%
Riga FC IITukums II
38%No goal before half-time62%
Riga FC IITukums II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.08
Riga FC IITukums II
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Riga FC IITukums II
1.15Goals conceded (2nd half)1.31
Riga FC IITukums II
1.85Average goals (2nd half)2.23
Riga FC IITukums II
46%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Riga FC IITukums II
46%No goal after half-time31%
Riga FC IITukums II

Riga FC II - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
20
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tukums II - second-half results

31% W15% R54% P
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Tukums II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-5-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Tukums II
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Tukums II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Riga FC IILigaTukums II
Average goals in match 3.383.43 3.77
Both teams scored 62%60% 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%68% 69%
Clean sheets 15%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 77%
Goal after half-time 85%84% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Riga FC II 1 - 0 - 1 Tukums II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II
2 : 1
Riga FC II
Riga FC II
1 : 0
FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II

FAQ

What was the result of Riga FC II vs Tukums II?

The 1. Liga match finished Riga FC II 2:0 Tukums II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga FC II and Tukums II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Riga FC II won 1, Tukums II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga FC II vs Tukums II?

Riga FC II score 1.62 goals per game on average and Tukums II 1.38. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Riga FC II's matches and 77% of Tukums II's.

What form are Riga FC II and Tukums II in?

Over the last 5 games Riga FC II have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Tukums II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga FC II vs Tukums II?

The statistical background for Riga FC II vs Tukums II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.