Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 06 September 2026

Riga vs Auda: match statistics

Riga crest
Riga
4 : 1half-time 2:1
Auda crest
Auda

Riga vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga played Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 12 May 2026. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Riga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Auda: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga scores 3.27 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. Auda scores 2.27 and concedes 1.09. League average: 3.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga 64%, Auda 73%. Over 2.5: Riga 91%, Auda 73%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Riga has higher xG: 2.01 vs 1.70. Riga: 16.6 shots per match, Auda: 13.9.

Match halves

Riga: half-time lead 64%, second-half goals 1.73. Auda: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 1.18.

Goals by minute

Riga: 76-90+ (9 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 4-1-0. Average goals 4.20, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Riga has a clear advantage in chance creation — at home they average 19.5 shots, 6.25 on target, scoring 3.0 goals per match with xG 2.27, while Auda away posts 13.83 shots, 4.83 on target, 1.83 goals and xG 1.63. Auda’s defense looks solid with only 0.83 goals conceded away versus Riga’s 1.25 conceded at home, but xG against comparison shows Riga allows 0.79 xG (Auda 0.94), meaning Riga concedes 0.46 more goals than xG suggests, while Auda defends 0.11 better than xG indicates. Both teams are in excellent form (Riga 4 wins and 1 draw in last 5, Auda 4 wins and 1 draw; both averaging 2.6 points per game) and scored 14 and 15 goals respectively in their last 5 matches. With superior possession (66% vs 58%), higher shot conversion (15% vs 13%) and greater xG (2.27 vs 1.63), the home side appear to have a marginal edge, so I forecast a Riga victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong signal for BTTS comes from seasonal indicators: Riga has BTTS at 80%, Auda 67%, both above the league average of 57%. In the last 5 matches Auda shows BTTS 80% versus 40% for Riga, but both teams have been scoring heavily recently — Riga scored 14 goals in 5 matches (avg 2.8), Auda 15 goals (avg 3.0) — and conceded 4 and 5 goals respectively. xG and shot metrics confirm goal potential: Riga generates 1.79 xG with xG against 1.23, Auda 1.63 xG with xG against 0.94; Riga averages 5.6 shots on target with a 20% conversion, Auda 4.83 with a 13% conversion. Seasonal clean sheet rates are low: 20% for Riga and 33% for Auda, while season tallies are 36 scored/13 conceded for Riga and 25/12 for Auda, further increasing the likelihood of goal exchange; therefore I recommend BTTS "Yes" with a probability of 78% versus 22% for "No".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Riga has a very offensive profile: they score an average of 2.8 goals per match and this season 100% of their games have gone Over 2.5, while Auda averages 3.0 goals in their last 5 matches and 50% of their season matches are over 2.5. Based on xG, Riga have xG 1.79 versus xG conceded by Auda 0.94, giving an expected 1.37 goals for the home side; Auda have xG 1.63 versus xG conceded by Riga 1.23, giving 1.43 for the visitors. The expected total is 2.80 goals, and the league average is 3.04 goals per match, which further supports Over markets; in the last 5 matches of both teams Over 2.5 occurred in 80% of cases. Riga average 5.6 shots on target with 20% conversion, Auda 4.83 shots on target with 13% conversion, and BTTS occurs in 80% of Riga’s season matches and 67% of Auda’s, increasing the likelihood of goal exchange. Therefore the best pick is Over 2.5 (back Over) — roughly 78% probability — because the expected total of 2.80 and Riga’s historical 100% of matches over 2.5 provide the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back HT/FT 1/2: Riga leads at the break, Auda wins after full-time. Riga leads at half-time in 60% of matches and scores an average of 1.4 goals in the first half. Riga also has higher average xG (1.79 vs 1.63 for Auda) and a seasonal goals-per-game average of 2.8 versus 1.83 for the visitors, which increases the hosts’ chance to take a lead before the break. However, Auda has an 83% win rate this season, averages 2.0 points in second halves and wins 50% of second halves, while Riga averages only 1.2 points and wins just 20% of second halves, suggesting a possible turnaround after the break. Additionally, Auda defends solidly (concedes 0.83 goals per game on average with 0.94 xG against), whereas Riga is more efficient with shots (conversion rate 20% vs 13%), which together indicate an early lead for the hosts and a greater probability that the visitors will take control by full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
RigaAuda
16Shots4
RigaAuda
7Shots on target1
RigaAuda
2.08xG0.67
RigaAuda
7Corners1
RigaAuda
82Dangerous attacks46
RigaAuda
16Fouls11
RigaAuda
4Cards5
RigaAuda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

3.27Goals scored / match2.27
RigaAuda
1.18Goals conceded / match1.09
RigaAuda
65%Average possession59%
RigaAuda
6.55Shots on target / match5.18
RigaAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.55Shots per match13.91
RigaAuda
6.55Shots on target5.18
RigaAuda
19.8%Shot conversion16.3%
RigaAuda
65%Possession59%
RigaAuda
2.01xG for1.7
RigaAuda
0.96xG against1.07
RigaAuda

Shooting quality

Riga: DominantAuda: Efficient finishing
RigaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)40%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
73% W18% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-1
2.36 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 0.80BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Auda
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
73% W9% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-2
2.27 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 0.80BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

3.27 goals / match - Riga · 2.27 goals / match - Auda

Auda is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.18 goals / match - Riga · 1.09 goals / match - Auda

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 100% of matches (11 of 11 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 100% of matches (11 of 11 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).

36Goals scored (season)25
RigaAuda
13Goals conceded (season)12
RigaAuda
4.45Average goals in match3.36
RigaAuda
14Goals scored (last 5)15
RigaAuda
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
RigaAuda

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
RigaAuda
82%2 goals73%
RigaAuda
73%3 goals18%
RigaAuda
36%4 goals9%
RigaAuda

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal73%
RigaAuda
36%2 goals27%
RigaAuda
18%3 goals9%
RigaAuda
0%4 goals0%
RigaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time36%
RigaAuda
18%BTTS in both halves0%
RigaAuda
73%Scored in both halves55%
RigaAuda

BTTS and goal count

64%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
RigaAuda
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
RigaAuda
40%BTTS - last 580%
RigaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
RigaAuda
73%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
RigaAuda
36%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
RigaAuda

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
RigaAuda
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
RigaAuda
45%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
RigaAuda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.09 pts / match - Riga · 1.91 pts / match - Auda

Riga - half-time state
64% leading18% draw18% trailing
Auda - half-time state
55% leading27% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.09Points per match (1st half)1.91
RigaAuda
1.55Goals scored (1st half)1.09
RigaAuda
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.55
RigaAuda
2.09Average goals (1st half)1.64
RigaAuda
55%Clean sheet before half-time55%
RigaAuda
18%No goal before half-time18%
RigaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

2.18Points per match (2nd half)1.64
RigaAuda
1.73Goals scored (2nd half)1.18
RigaAuda
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
RigaAuda
2.36Average goals (2nd half)1.73
RigaAuda
55%Clean sheet after half-time55%
RigaAuda
9%No goal after half-time27%
RigaAuda

Riga - second-half results

64% W27% R9% P
23
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 64% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Auda - second-half results

36% W55% R9% P
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 73%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Riga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+5+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7
Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match1.41.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match2.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
8
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Auda
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
7
2
31-45
6
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.91
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
130%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
206%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

RigaLigaAuda
Average goals in match 4.453.00 3.36
Both teams scored 64%59% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 91%52% 73%
Clean sheets 36%22% 27%
Goal before half-time 91%74% 91%
Goal after half-time 91%86% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+-10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Riga 4 - 1 - 0 Auda. Average goals 4.20, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Auda
1 : 2
Riga
Riga FC
6 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
1 : 3
Riga FC
FK Auda Riga
1 : 3
Riga FC
Riga FC
2 : 2
FK Auda Riga

FAQ

What was the result of Riga vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished Riga 4:1 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga and Auda?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Riga won 4, Auda won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs Auda?

Riga score 3.27 goals per game on average and Auda 2.27. The Virsliga average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Riga's matches and 73% of Auda's.

What form are Riga and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games Riga have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Auda 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs Auda?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.