Riga vs Liepāja: match statistics
Riga vs Liepāja: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Riga play Liepāja in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 3 May 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Riga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Liepāja: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Riga scores 2.96 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Liepāja scores 1.27 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Riga 57%, Liepāja 55%. Over 2.5: Riga 83%, Liepāja 59%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Riga has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.50. Riga: 17.1 shots per match, Liepāja: 12.4.
Match halves
Riga: half-time lead 70%, second-half goals 1.43. Liepāja: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Riga: 31-45+ (16 goals). Liepāja: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
6 H2H matches: 5-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.
Match description
Riga is the clear favorite for this fixture — at home they average 3.67 goals per game, register 20.33 shots with 6 on target and 18% conversion, with a 67% win rate and 0% defeats at home. Liepāja away average only 1.25 goals, produce 15 shots (4 on target) with 8% conversion and have scored 10 goals this season versus Riga’s 32. Riga generates higher xG (2.21 at home vs 1.71 xG for Liepāja away) and creates more chances (20.33 vs 15), while Liepāja’s opponents record a higher xG against them (1.17 vs 0.69 for Riga), indicating the hosts’ superiority in quality and frequency of opportunities. Form corroborates the home advantage: Riga have won 3 of their last 5 matches and average 2.2 points per game in that period, whereas Liepāja have only 1 win and 1.2 points per game. Considering the advantage in shot volume, conversion rate (18% vs 8%), higher xG and superior goals tally (32 vs 10), I predict a Riga victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Riga | Liepāja | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Riga is 333% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Riga · 0.6 pts / match - Liepāja
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga is 133% better for: goals scored per match.
2.96 goals / match - Riga · 1.27 goals / match - Liepāja
Riga is 78% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.87 goals / match - Riga · 1.55 goals / match - Liepāja
Riga scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).
Liepāja scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Riga
Over / Under — Liepāja
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.22 pts / match - Riga · 1.23 pts / match - Liepāja
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Riga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 70% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Liepāja - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Riga
Liepāja
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Riga | Liga | Liepāja | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.83 | 2.98 | ▼ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | • 57% | 56% | • 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 55% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 24% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 75% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Riga 5 - 0 - 1 Liepāja. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Riga vs Liepāja?
The Virsliga match finished Riga 1:0 Liepāja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Riga and Liepāja?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Riga won 5, Liepāja won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs Liepāja?
Riga score 2.96 goals per game on average and Liepāja 1.27. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Riga's matches and 55% of Liepāja's.
What form are Riga and Liepāja in?
Over the last 5 games Riga have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Liepāja 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs Liepāja?
The statistical background for Riga vs Liepāja — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.