Rīgas FS II vs Metta - LU: match statistics
Rīgas FS II vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rīgas FS II play Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Rīgas FS II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rīgas FS II scores 1.23 and concedes 2.08 goals per match. Metta - LU scores 3.54 and concedes 0.85. League average: 3.43 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rīgas FS II 54%, Metta - LU 54%. Over 2.5: Rīgas FS II 69%, Metta - LU 85%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.83 vs 1.37. Rīgas FS II: 8.9 shots per match, Metta - LU: 20.1.
Match halves
Rīgas FS II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.54. Metta - LU: half-time lead 85%, second-half goals 1.54.
Goals by minute
Rīgas FS II: 0-15 (4 goals). Metta - LU: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I back the away win (2) because Metta - LU holds a clear advantage across key metrics: the visitors average 3.0 goals per away match with xG 2.58, whereas Rīgas FS II score 2.0 goals at home with xG 1.49. Metta averages 19 shots and 10 shots on target per match with 58% possession, versus the hosts’ 10.5 shots and 5 shots on target and 43% possession, resulting in more high-quality chances for the away side. Defensively the hosts are highly vulnerable — conceding 4.0 goals per home match with xG against 1.99, while Metta concede 1.0 goals away with xG against 0.57. In their last five fixtures Metta have 4 wins and 1 draw, averaging 2.6 points per game, whereas Rīgas FS II record 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, averaging 1.0 point per game. Therefore I assign the visitors a 70% probability to win, 20% for a draw and 10% for a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS II | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Metta - LU is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Rīgas FS II · 2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 188% better for: goals scored per match.
1.23 goals / match - Rīgas FS II · 3.54 goals / match - Metta - LU
Metta - LU is 145% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.08 goals / match - Rīgas FS II · 0.85 goals / match - Metta - LU
Rīgas FS II scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 matches).
Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (13 of 13 matches), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Rīgas FS II
Over / Under — Metta - LU
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.69 pts / match - Rīgas FS II · 2.69 pts / match - Metta - LU
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 23%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 85% of matches and wins 85%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +9 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rīgas FS II
Metta - LU
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS II | Liga | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.31 | 3.43 | ▲ 4.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 60% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 69% | 68% | ▲ 85% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 23% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 71% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 84% | • 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Rīgas FS II vs Metta - LU?
The 1. Liga match finished Rīgas FS II 0:3 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS II vs Metta - LU?
Rīgas FS II score 1.23 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 3.54. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Rīgas FS II's matches and 54% of Metta - LU's.
What form are Rīgas FS II and Metta - LU in?
Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS II have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS II vs Metta - LU?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rīgas FS II vs Metta - LU: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.