Rīgas FS II vs Rēzekne / BJSS: match statistics
Rīgas FS II vs Rēzekne / BJSS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rīgas FS II played Rēzekne / BJSS in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Rīgas FS II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Rēzekne / BJSS: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rīgas FS II scores 1.22 and concedes 2.33 goals per match. Rēzekne / BJSS scores 0.78 and concedes 3.11. League average: 3.52 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rīgas FS II 56%, Rēzekne / BJSS 56%. Over 2.5: Rīgas FS II 78%, Rēzekne / BJSS 78%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 69%.
xG, shots and style
Rīgas FS II has higher xG: 1.22 vs 0.63. Rīgas FS II: 8.7 shots per match, Rēzekne / BJSS: 2.1.
Match halves
Rīgas FS II: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.44. Rēzekne / BJSS: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
Rīgas FS II: 0-15 (3 goals). Rēzekne / BJSS: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.52 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 69%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rīgas FS II appear to be the clear favorites: at home they average 1.4 goals per game and register 3.8 shots on target with a conversion rate of 16%, whereas Rēzekne / BJSS away average only 0.25 goals, 1.5 shots on target and a 10% conversion. In terms of chance quality the hosts have home xG 1.27 versus the visitors’ away xG 0.44, and both defenses are vulnerable — hosts concede 2.8 goals per home game, visitors 3.25 on the road. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 7 goals and average 1.4 points per game (2W, 1D, 2L), while the visitors, despite 6 goals in that period, average only 0.8 points per game and have lost all away fixtures this season (100% away defeats). The hosts have no clean sheets at home (0%), but fail to score in only 20% of home matches, whereas the visitors failed to score in 75% of away games, limiting their prospects. Therefore, given the superiority in chance quality (xG 1.27 vs 0.44), higher number of shots on target (3.8 vs 1.5) and the visitors’ disastrous away record, I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because the majority of indicators point to both teams scoring. Rīgas FS II has BTTS in 80% of matches this season and averages 1.2 goals per match, while the league BTTS is 63% with a league goals average of 3.45, favoring Goal/Goal outcomes. Both teams concede heavily — averaging 3.0 (home) and 3.25 (away) goals per match — and both have 0% clean sheets this season, so a clean sheet expected is unlikely. Although Rēzekne/BJSS has a season scoring average of only 0.25 and season BTTS of 25%, in the last 5 matches they averaged 1.2 goals and registered BTTS in 80%, and recent xG_for for the visitors is 0.96 versus home xG_against 1.66, which increases the chance of an away goal. Considering the above, I estimate a 75% probability for Yes and 25% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams produce a lot of goals: the home side averages 1.2 scored and 3.0 conceded per season, while the visitors average 0.25 scored and 3.25 conceded. xG analysis shows the home attack at xG 1.02 versus the away defense xG 3.07, yielding an expected ≈2.05 goals for the home team; the visitors have xG 0.44 against the home defense xG 2.32 ⇒ ≈1.38 for the away side, total ≈3.43. A Poisson distribution with λ≈3.43 gives roughly an 86% chance of Over 1.5 goals, about 67% for Over 2.5 and around 45% for Over 3.5. Additionally, the percentage of matches with Over 1.5 goals is 100% for the home team and 75% for the visitors, and Over 2.5 stands at 80% and 75% respectively, reinforcing the Over signal. Given the highest probability and the consistency between xG and historical percentages, I recommend betting Over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I am backing X/1 (draw at half-time, home win): the hosts were level at the break in 50% of their matches this season, and in their last 5 fixtures a half-time draw occurred in 60% of cases. The hosts have a clear attacking advantage — they average 1.2 goals per game versus 0.25 for the visitors, have xG of 1.02 compared to 0.44 and average 4.5 shots on target against 1.5 for their opponents, which increases their chances of goals after the break. The visitors are markedly weaker: seasonally they have 0% wins and 100% losses and lose at half-time in 75% of their matches, with a half-time goals average of 0.0, so a turnaround is unlikely. The second half delivers many goals — the hosts average 2.5 second-half goals and have scored 3 goals in the 46–60 minute window, suggesting the decision will come after the break. Given these numbers the strongest scenario is a draw at the break and a Rīgas FS II victory by full-time, hence the X/1 selection.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS II | Rēzekne / BJSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 63% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.30 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.59 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rīgas FS II is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Rīgas FS II · 0.8 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS II is 56% better for: goals scored per match.
1.22 goals / match - Rīgas FS II · 0.78 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS
Rīgas FS II is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.33 goals / match - Rīgas FS II · 3.11 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS
Rīgas FS II scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Rēzekne / BJSS keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 9 matches).
Rēzekne / BJSS scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rīgas FS II
Over / Under - Rēzekne / BJSS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS II is 128% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.78 pts / match - Rīgas FS II · 0.78 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 22%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Rēzekne / BJSS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 11%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rīgas FS II
Rēzekne / BJSS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS II | Liga | Rēzekne / BJSS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.56 | 3.52 | ▲ 3.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 63% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 78% | 69% | ▲ 78% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 22% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 68% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 83% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Rīgas FS II 0 - 1 - 1 Rēzekne / BJSS. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rīgas FS II vs Rēzekne / BJSS?
The 1. Liga match finished Rīgas FS II 3:0 Rēzekne / BJSS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS II and Rēzekne / BJSS?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS II won 0, Rēzekne / BJSS won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS II vs Rēzekne / BJSS?
Rīgas FS II score 1.22 goals per game on average and Rēzekne / BJSS 0.78. The 1. Liga average is 3.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Rīgas FS II's matches and 56% of Rēzekne / BJSS's.
What form are Rīgas FS II and Rēzekne / BJSS in?
Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS II have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Rēzekne / BJSS 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS II vs Rēzekne / BJSS?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.