Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II: match statistics
Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rīgas FS II played Riga FC II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Rīgas FS II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Riga FC II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rīgas FS II scores 1.40 and concedes 2.10 goals per match. Riga FC II scores 1.40 and concedes 2.10. League average: 3.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rīgas FS II 50%, Riga FC II 60%. Over 2.5: Rīgas FS II 80%, Riga FC II 70%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 69%.
xG, shots and style
Riga FC II has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.29. Rīgas FS II: 9.2 shots per match, Riga FC II: 8.3.
Match halves
Rīgas FS II: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.60. Riga FC II: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Rīgas FS II: 0-15 (4 goals). Riga FC II: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.47 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 69%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rīgas FS II appear to be the favourites: in the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 9 goals and won 3 of 5 games, while Riga FC II have scored 5 goals and won only 1; the hosts’ points average in this period is 2.0 per game versus 0.6 per game for the visitors. At home Rīgas FS II average 1.67 goals per match, register 9.67 shots of which 4.17 are on target and have a conversion rate of 17%, whereas the visitors on the road average 1.0 goal, 7.5 shots and 3.5 on target with a 13% conversion. The home xG is 1.38 versus 1.09 xG for the visitors away, which together with a higher number and quality of shots indicates the hosts create better chances; both defenses are vulnerable however, as the hosts concede an average of 2.33 goals per home match and the visitors 2.2 on the road. Riga FC II’s away metrics are worrying: 0% away wins, 80% losses and 0% clean sheets, while the hosts at home have 33% wins and 17% of matches without conceding. Considering the hosts’ 9 goals in the last 5 matches, better conversion (17% vs 13%) and the visitors’ significantly poorer away form, I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 60% (Rīgas FS II 60% and Riga FC II 60%), against a league average of 61%, which is a strong indicator for BTTS - Yes. Rīgas FS II averages 1.8 goals per game with xG 1.55 and concedes 2.0 goals on the season (1.2 in the last 5), while Riga FC II scores 1.0 goals per game with xG 1.09 and concedes 2.2 goals both on the season and in the last 5, so both defenses are vulnerable. The home side averages 6.6 shots on target and 10.8 total shots, the visitors 3.5 on target and 7.5 total; in the last 5 matches the home team scored 9 and conceded 6, the visitors scored 5 and conceded 11, which suggests that while Rīgas creates more chances, the opponents also have scoring opportunities. Additionally, 80% of home matches finish over 2.5 goals and both teams have 60% of matches with Over 2.5 and BTTS 60%, therefore I give the pick "BTTS - Yes" with moderate confidence 65% for and 35% against.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistics strongly favor goals: the home side averages 1.8 goals/match, the away team 1.0, with xG of 1.55 (home) and 1.09 (away), yielding estimated 1.70 expected goals for the hosts and 1.45 for the visitors (total 3.15). Seasonal metrics show both teams have 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals, the home team records Over 2.5 in 80% of games, the away team in 60%, and the league averages 3.46 goals per match. The hosts average 10.8 shots and 6.6 on target with a 17% conversion rate, while the visitors average 7.5/3.5 with a 13% conversion, supporting the likelihood of multiple strikes. Given the expected 3.15 goals and historical over-2.5 percentages (80% vs 60%), I assess the probability of Over 1.5 at 98% and Over 2.5 at approximately 72%. Over 3.5 is less certain: seasonal Over 3.5 is 60% (home) vs 40% (away), but the estimated 3.15 goals is below 3.5, so I assign Over 3.5 ~46%. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Rīgas FS II leads at the break in 60% of matches and scores an average of 1.4 goals before half-time while conceding only 0.4 (leadingAtHTPercentage_home=60, scoredAVGHT_home=1.4, concededAVGHT_home=0.4), so there is a high probability of the home side holding a lead after 45 minutes. The hosts win 60% of matches versus 0% for the visitors (winPercentage_home=60, winPercentage_away=0), have a higher xG (1.55 vs 1.09) and more shots on target (6.6 vs 3.5), therefore I assign the largest weight to the 1/1 scenario (42%). On the other hand, the hosts concede an average of 1.6 goals in the second half while the visitors score 0.6 after the break (conceded_2hg_avg_home=1.6, scored_2hg_avg_away=0.6), which justifies accounting for full-time draws (1/X=12%, X/X=15%). In the last 5 matches the hosts have 3 wins (60% in last 5) versus 1 win for the visitors (20%), further reinforcing the 1/1 scenario as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS II | Riga FC II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 55% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rīgas FS II is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Rīgas FS II · 0.6 pts / match - Riga FC II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS II scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).
Riga FC II scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rīgas FS II
Over / Under - Riga FC II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS II is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.9 pts / match - Rīgas FS II · 1.5 pts / match - Riga FC II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 30%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Riga FC II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 30%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rīgas FS II
Riga FC II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS II | Liga | Riga FC II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.50 | 3.47 | • 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 61% | • 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 69% | • 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 23% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 70% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 83% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Riga FC IIGoalNazar Prudchenko
- Riga FC IIGoalNazar Prudchenko
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Rīgas FS II 1 - 1 - 0 Riga FC II. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II?
The 1. Liga match finished Rīgas FS II 1:3 Riga FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS II and Riga FC II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS II won 1, Riga FC II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II?
Rīgas FS II score 1.40 goals per game on average and Riga FC II 1.40. The 1. Liga average is 3.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Rīgas FS II's matches and 60% of Riga FC II's.
What form are Rīgas FS II and Riga FC II in?
Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Riga FC II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II?
The statistical background for Rīgas FS II vs Riga FC II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


