Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 07 September 2026

Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II: match statistics

Rīgas FS II crest
Rīgas FS II
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Super Nova II crest
Super Nova II

Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rīgas FS II played Super Nova II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 5 July 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Rīgas FS II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Super Nova II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rīgas FS II scores 1.36 and concedes 2.18 goals per match. Super Nova II scores 1.64 and concedes 1.45. League average: 3.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rīgas FS II 55%, Super Nova II 64%. Over 2.5: Rīgas FS II 82%, Super Nova II 45%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Super Nova II has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.29. Rīgas FS II: 8.3 shots per match, Super Nova II: 8.7.

Match halves

Rīgas FS II: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.55. Super Nova II: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.91.

Goals by minute

Rīgas FS II: 0-15 (4 goals). Super Nova II: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.48 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back an away win. Super Nova II sit 6th versus Rīgas FS II in 10th and have scored 18 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 15, with away goals per game 1.75 vs hosts’ 1.57. In the last five matches the visitors average 2.0 points per game and have scored 9 goals, while the hosts average 1.8 points per game and have scored 10; concurrently the hosts concede 2.43 goals per home game versus the visitors’ 2.25 concessions on the road. Super Nova’s edge is confirmed by more shots on target (5.25 vs 4.17), a higher shots average (11 vs 9.67) and superior expected goals xG 1.48 vs 1.38, and additionally the visitors have not had an away match without scoring (0% such games) versus 14% of the hosts’ matches being goalless for them. Although the combined goals average for both teams is 4.0, the quality metrics and consistency in scoring favour a slight advantage to the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal BTTS rate is 57% for Rīgas FS II and 75% for Super Nova II, with the league average at 62%, providing a strong signal that both teams regularly score and concede. Both sides average over 1.5 goals per match (home 1.57, away 1.75), with seasonal goals conceded of 1.00 and 2.25 respectively, so the visitors are particularly prone to conceding. In the last 5 matches the home team had BTTS in 60% of games and the visitors in 40%, with average goals 2.0 (home) and 1.8 (away) and goals conceded 1.8 and 1.6, indicating that in recent form both teams exchange goals. Additionally xG and shots on target favor the away side (xG_for 1.48 vs 1.18 and 5.25 SoT vs 3.5), which increases the likelihood of goals from both teams; therefore I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability of 66%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model (average attacking xG and defensive xG conceded) yields 1.57 xG for Rīgas FS II ((1.18 + 1.96)/2) and 1.50 xG for Super Nova II ((1.48 + 1.52)/2), totaling 3.07 expected goals. With a Poisson distribution at mean 3.07 we get P(0)=4.6% and P(1)=14.3%, so the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 81%; Over 2.5 is ~59%, and Over 3.5 ~37%. Seasonal figures corroborate a goal-prone trend: the league averages 3.51 goals/match, hosts score 1.57 goals/match on the season and averaged 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches, with the hosts’ last 5 fixtures producing 100% Over 2.5 outcomes. Additionally, BTTS for the away team is 75% on the season and overall league BTTS is 62%, which increases the chance of at least two goals. Based on the above data the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (over, line 1.5) with an edge of approximately 81%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Rīgas FS II led at half-time in 4 matches (leadingAtHT_home = 4.0, 57%) and average 1.0 goal by half with only 0.29 conceded (scoredAVGHT_home = 1.0, concededAVGHT_home = 0.29), while Super Nova II average 0.25 goals by half and concede 1.25 (scoredAVGHT_away = 0.25, concededAVGHT_away = 1.25). The home side also has a superior full-match record: 57.0% wins and 1.86 season points per game at home (winPercentage_home = 57.0, seasonPPG_home = 1.86) versus 25.0% wins and 1.25 points away (winPercentage_away = 25.0, seasonPPG_away = 1.25). Conversely, the visitors are dangerous after the break — AVG_2hg_away = 2.5 and an average 1.5 goals in second halves (scored_2hg_avg_away = 1.5) with over05_2hg_percentage_away = 100.0%, which increases the likelihood of a turnaround. Considering the hosts’ dominance at half-time (57% HT leads) and their advantage in final results, the safest scenario is 1/1 (home leading at half and winning by full-time), hence the pick 1/1 with an estimated probability of ~40%, with a clear but smaller risk of a draw or an away comeback in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
19Shots6
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
8Shots on target5
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
2.47xG0.89
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
8Corners4
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
98Dangerous attacks21
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
16Fouls10
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
0Cards0
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
1.36Goals scored / match1.64
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
2.18Goals conceded / match1.45
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
41%Average possession44%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
3.27Shots on target / match3.73
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.27Shots per match8.73
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
3.27Shots on target3.73
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
16.5%Shot conversion18.8%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
41%Possession44%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
1.29xG for1.3
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
1.78xG against1.69
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

Shooting quality

Rīgas FS II: Counter-attackingSuper Nova II: Counter-attacking
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
Accuracy (shots on target)40%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Super Nova II is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Rīgas FS II · 2 pts / match - Super Nova II

Rīgas FS II
LWWWL
Season result split
27% W18% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Super Nova II
WWDLW
Season result split
45% W27% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-3
1.64 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 away
1-2-1
DDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Super Nova II is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

1.36 goals / match - Rīgas FS II · 1.64 goals / match - Super Nova II

Super Nova II is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.18 goals / match - Rīgas FS II · 1.45 goals / match - Super Nova II

Rīgas FS II scoring profile: strong

Rīgas FS II scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Super Nova II keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

Super Nova II scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova II scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).

15Goals scored (season)18
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
24Goals conceded (season)16
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
3.55Average goals in match3.09
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
10Goals scored (last 5)9
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal82%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
36%2 goals55%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
27%3 goals27%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
9%4 goals0%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal73%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
64%2 goals18%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
45%3 goals18%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
18%4 goals9%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time9%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
36%Scored in both halves27%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
60%BTTS - last 540%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
82%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS II - half-time state
45% leading45% draw9% trailing
Super Nova II - half-time state
45% leading45% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.82Points per match (1st half)1.82
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.73
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.36
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
73%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
36%No goal before half-time45%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.91Points per match (2nd half)1.27
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
1.91Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
2.45Average goals (2nd half)1.73
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
27%Clean sheet after half-time27%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II
64%No goal after half-time45%
Rīgas FS IISuper Nova II

Rīgas FS II - second-half results

27% W9% R64% P
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding60%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.6

Concedes 1.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Super Nova II - second-half results

27% W45% R27% P
20
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Rīgas FS II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Super Nova II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rīgas FS II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
4
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
5
46-60
3
6
61-75
2
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

Super Nova II
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.32
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rīgas FS II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Super Nova II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Rīgas FS IILigaSuper Nova II
Average goals in match 3.553.48 3.09
Both teams scored 55%62% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 82%68% 45%
Clean sheets 18%22% 27%
Goal before half-time 73%72% 64%
Goal after half-time 91%85% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.48
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.89
Home goals / match
1.59
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Rems Gastons Dzeguze⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Rīgas FS IIGoalRems Gastons Dzeguze

FAQ

What was the result of Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?

The 1. Liga match finished Rīgas FS II 1:1 Super Nova II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?

Rīgas FS II score 1.36 goals per game on average and Super Nova II 1.64. The 1. Liga average is 3.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Rīgas FS II's matches and 64% of Super Nova II's.

What form are Rīgas FS II and Super Nova II in?

Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Super Nova II 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS II vs Super Nova II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.