Bulgaria - Second LeagueStadion IskarData current as of 07 September 2026

Rilski Sportist vs Montana: match statistics

Rilski Sportist crest
Rilski Sportist
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Montana crest
Montana

Rilski Sportist vs Montana: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rilski Sportist played Montana in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: Stadion Iskar. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Rilski Sportist: 0-2-2, 0.50 points/match. Montana: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rilski Sportist scores 0.75 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Montana scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rilski Sportist 50%, Montana 75%. Over 2.5: Rilski Sportist 25%, Montana 75%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Rilski Sportist has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.64. Rilski Sportist: 15.5 shots per match, Montana: 13.0.

Match halves

Rilski Sportist: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Montana: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Rilski Sportist: 16-30 (1 goals). Montana: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Montana sit 5th, while Rilski Sportist are only 16th, and across the season the visitors have won 2 of 4 meetings, scoring 8 goals compared with the hosts’ 0 wins and 3 goals. The visitors are more clinical: they average 2 goals per away match and convert 17% of their shots, whereas Rilski score just once on average despite 16.5 attempts and an xG of 2.02. The hosts’ strengths are 64% possession and the better quality of chances they allow, as their opponents generate an average of 0.93 xG, while Montana concede as much as 1.86 away from home. At the same time, the visitors’ defence remains a clear risk, conceding an average of 2.5 goals away and failing to keep a clean sheet. However, the recent five-match form slightly favours Montana, who have collected 1.4 points per game compared with Rilski’s 1.0, so the visitors should be given the edge to secure a narrow victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear, as Montana has recorded BTTS in 100% of its matches so far, while both teams have reached 60% in their last five fixtures. Rilski Sportist averages 2.0 goals at home, whereas Montana concedes as many as 2.5 goals per away match and has kept no clean sheets. The visitors should also create chances: their average of 2.0 goals scored and xG of 1.49 look solid against Rilski’s xG against of 1.22. Although the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their home matches, their recent defensive performances saw them concede an average of 1.2 goals, while Montana scored 1.6 goals per game over the same period. In addition, neither team has finished a match without scoring, making the BTTS - Yes scenario more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Rilski Sportist generate an average of 1.81 xG, while Montana concede an average of 1.86 xG, clearly supporting at least two home goals or a high volume of chances from the hosts. The visitors score an average of 2.0 goals per match from 1.49 xG, while Rilski Sportist have conceded an average of 1.2 goals in their last five matches. Montana are yet to keep a clean sheet and have exceeded both the 1.5-goal and 2.5-goal lines in 100% of their matches, while both teams have scored in every game. Although the league average is 2.5 goals, the projected total of 3.10 and Montana’s defensive numbers provide the strongest betting edge on Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a draw at half-time: in Rilski’s two home matches to date and Montana’s two away games, both teams were level after the first 45 minutes. This trend is supported by their recent form, with the hosts drawing at half-time in 50% of their matches and Montana in as many as 80%, while neither side has held a half-time lead. After the break, the advantage should shift to Rilski Sportist, who average 1.5 goals in the second half at home and concede none during that period, whereas Montana concede an average of 1.0 goal away from home. The hosts also have a significantly stronger full-match record on home turf: they win 100% of their matches, score an average of 2.0 goals and concede only 0.5, while Montana have not won any away game and allow opponents to score 2.5 goals per match. Rilski’s higher xG of 1.81 compared with Montana’s 1.49 further supports a scenario of a draw at half-time followed by a home win at the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Rilski SportistMontana
12Shots14
Rilski SportistMontana
3Shots on target7
Rilski SportistMontana
1.24xG1.67
Rilski SportistMontana
4Corners7
Rilski SportistMontana
38Dangerous attacks41
Rilski SportistMontana
12Fouls16
Rilski SportistMontana
0Cards0
Rilski SportistMontana

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Rilski SportistMontana
0.75Goals scored / match2
Rilski SportistMontana
1.25Goals conceded / match1.5
Rilski SportistMontana
55%Average possession53%
Rilski SportistMontana
5Shots on target / match4.75
Rilski SportistMontana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.5Shots per match13
Rilski SportistMontana
5Shots on target4.75
Rilski SportistMontana
4.8%Shot conversion15.4%
Rilski SportistMontana
55%Possession53%
Rilski SportistMontana
1.88xG for1.64
Rilski SportistMontana
1.63xG against1.54
Rilski SportistMontana

Shooting quality

Rilski Sportist: DominantMontana: Efficient finishing
Rilski SportistMontana
Accuracy (shots on target)32%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.150.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Montana is 250% better for: last-5 form.

0.5 pts / match - Rilski Sportist · 1.75 pts / match - Montana

Rilski Sportist
LLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-2
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-2
0.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 25%
Montana
DWLW
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Montana is 167% better for: goals scored per match.

0.75 goals / match - Rilski Sportist · 2 goals / match - Montana

Rilski Sportist is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Rilski Sportist · 1.5 goals / match - Montana

Rilski Sportist scoring profile: strong

Rilski Sportist scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Montana keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

Montana scoring profile: very strong

Montana scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Rilski Sportist keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

3Goals scored (season)8
Rilski SportistMontana
5Goals conceded (season)6
Rilski SportistMontana
2Average goals in match3.5
Rilski SportistMontana
3Goals scored (last 5)8
Rilski SportistMontana
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Rilski SportistMontana

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%2 goals75%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%3 goals25%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%4 goals0%
Rilski SportistMontana

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal75%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%2 goals50%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%3 goals25%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%4 goals0%
Rilski SportistMontana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time75%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%BTTS in both halves25%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%Scored in both halves50%
Rilski SportistMontana

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Rilski SportistMontana
50%BTTS - last 575%
Rilski SportistMontana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time75%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Rilski SportistMontana

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Rilski SportistMontana
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Rilski SportistMontana
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Rilski SportistMontana

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Montana is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Rilski Sportist · 1 pts / match - Montana

Rilski Sportist - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Montana - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)1
Rilski SportistMontana
0.25Goals scored (1st half)1
Rilski SportistMontana
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)1
Rilski SportistMontana
1Average goals (1st half)2
Rilski SportistMontana
25%Clean sheet before half-time25%
Rilski SportistMontana
75%No goal before half-time25%
Rilski SportistMontana

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Rilski SportistMontana
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
Rilski SportistMontana
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Rilski SportistMontana
1Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Rilski SportistMontana
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Rilski SportistMontana
50%No goal after half-time25%
Rilski SportistMontana

Rilski Sportist - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Montana - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
4
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rilski Sportist - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.501.25
Goals scored / match0.30.5
Goals conceded / match0.80.5
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal75%75%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal75%50%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
Montana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.75
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.5
Average goals in match2.01.5
1 goal75%100%
2 goals75%50%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal25%25%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 75% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rilski Sportist
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Montana
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rilski Sportist

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Montana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

Rilski SportistLigaMontana
Average goals in match 2.002.57 3.50
Both teams scored 50%49% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%41% 75%
Clean sheets 0%27% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%62% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%76% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Rilski Sportist vs Montana?

The Second League match finished Rilski Sportist 2:1 Montana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Rilski Sportist vs Montana?

Rilski Sportist score 0.75 goals per game on average and Montana 2.00. The Second League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Rilski Sportist's matches and 75% of Montana's.

What form are Rilski Sportist and Montana in?

Over the last 5 games Rilski Sportist have a 0-2-2 record (0.50 points per game) and Montana 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rilski Sportist vs Montana?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.