Netherlands - Eerste DivisieParkstad Limburg StadionData current as of 31 October 2026

Roda JC vs AZ II: match statistics

Roda JC crest
Roda JC
2 : 1half-time 1:0
AZ II crest
AZ II

Roda JC vs AZ II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Roda JC played AZ II in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 30 October 2026. Venue: Parkstad Limburg Stadion. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Roda JC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. AZ II: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Roda JC scores 1.25 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. AZ II scores 2.58 and concedes 2.17. League average: 3.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Roda JC 50%, AZ II 83%. Over 2.5: Roda JC 33%, AZ II 75%. League level: BTTS 69%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

AZ II has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.42. Roda JC: 12.5 shots per match, AZ II: 15.8.

Match halves

Roda JC: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.83. AZ II: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.50.

Goals by minute

Roda JC: 46-60 (4 goals). AZ II: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eerste Divisie: 3.59 goals per match, BTTS 69%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Roda JC sit 5th and have won 60% of their home matches without suffering a single defeat, which points to the hosts. They have collected 10 points in their last five games, while AZ II have earned 8, although the visitors have scored as many as 14 goals in that period compared with Roda's 8. AZ II's attack is also dangerous away from home, averaging 3.17 goals per match with an xG of 1.87, so the hosts' defence will face a stern test. However, Roda concede just 0.8 goals per game at home, while AZ II allow an average of 2.67 goals away and have yet to keep a clean sheet on the road. This defensive difference, despite the visitors' greater attacking threat, gives Roda a slight edge in the prediction.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

AZ II have seen both teams score in 100% of their matches, compared with 67% for Roda JC, making BTTS - Yes a strong pick. The visitors average 3.17 goals scored and 2.67 conceded, while the hosts average 2.00 scored and 1.67 conceded per match. Neither team has kept a clean sheet so far, and average xG of 1.81 for Roda and 1.87 for AZ II suggests that both sides are capable of creating chances consistently. In their last five matches, BTTS landed in 60% of Roda’s games and 80% of AZ II’s, so recent form also supports this selection. One risk is that Roda have failed to score in 33% of their matches, but with AZ II conceding an average of 2.67 goals, both teams to score remains clearly the more likely scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Roda matches average 3.67 goals, while AZ II matches average as many as 5.84, indicating strong scoring potential. Roda score an average of 2.00 goals, while AZ II concede 2.67; meanwhile, the visitors score 3.17 goals per game, compared with 1.67 conceded by the hosts. Their attacking potential is reflected in the xG figures: 1.81 for Roda and 1.87 for AZ II, and neither team has kept a clean sheet so far. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, having landed in 67% of Roda matches and 100% of AZ II matches; the higher Over 2.5 goals line has landed in 67% and 83% of cases, respectively. The 4.05-goal projection points towards the Over, although Roda’s results suggest greater risk at higher goal lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal concerns the start of the match: AZ II led at the break in 50% of their matches, compared with just 17% for Roda JC. The visitors average 1.33 goals before half-time, versus 0.83 for the hosts, which points to them leading after 45 minutes. They could maintain that advantage given AZ II’s scoring output across full matches: an average of 3.17 goals scored, compared with Roda’s 2.00, while the visitors average 1.83 goals after the break. However, 2/2 is not a clear favorite, as AZ II concede an average of 2.67 goals per match and Roda have won 3 of their last 5 matches, increasing the likelihood of a turnaround.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Roda JCAZ II
13Shots10
Roda JCAZ II
6Shots on target5
Roda JCAZ II
1.64xG1.32
Roda JCAZ II
8Corners4
Roda JCAZ II
55Dangerous attacks46
Roda JCAZ II
7Fouls17
Roda JCAZ II
1Cards3
Roda JCAZ II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.25Goals scored / match2.58
Roda JCAZ II
0.92Goals conceded / match2.17
Roda JCAZ II
50%Average possession51%
Roda JCAZ II
4.92Shots on target / match6.58
Roda JCAZ II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match15.83
Roda JCAZ II
4.92Shots on target6.58
Roda JCAZ II
10%Shot conversion16.3%
Roda JCAZ II
50%Possession51%
Roda JCAZ II
1.42xG for1.84
Roda JCAZ II
1.41xG against1.74
Roda JCAZ II

Shooting quality

Roda JC: BalancedAZ II: Attacking
Roda JCAZ II
Accuracy (shots on target)39%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Roda JC is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Roda JC · 1.6 pts / match - AZ II

Roda JC
WLDWW
Season result split
50% W33% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-2
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
AZ II
DWLDW
Season result split
42% W17% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-5
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AZ II is 106% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Roda JC · 2.58 goals / match - AZ II

Roda JC is 136% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - Roda JC · 2.17 goals / match - AZ II

Roda JC scoring profile: very strong

Roda JC scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while AZ II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 12 matches).

AZ II scoring profile: very strong

AZ II scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Roda JC keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).

15Goals scored (season)31
Roda JCAZ II
11Goals conceded (season)26
Roda JCAZ II
2.17Average goals in match4.75
Roda JCAZ II
8Goals scored (last 5)14
Roda JCAZ II
6Goals conceded (last 5)11
Roda JCAZ II

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal83%
Roda JCAZ II
42%2 goals58%
Roda JCAZ II
8%3 goals42%
Roda JCAZ II
0%4 goals42%
Roda JCAZ II

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
Roda JCAZ II
25%2 goals58%
Roda JCAZ II
0%3 goals42%
Roda JCAZ II
0%4 goals17%
Roda JCAZ II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time50%
Roda JCAZ II
8%BTTS in both halves33%
Roda JCAZ II
25%Scored in both halves50%
Roda JCAZ II

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Roda JCAZ II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Roda JCAZ II
60%BTTS - last 580%
Roda JCAZ II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Roda JCAZ II
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
Roda JCAZ II
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
Roda JCAZ II

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
Roda JCAZ II
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Roda JCAZ II
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Roda JCAZ II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AZ II is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Roda JC · 1.42 pts / match - AZ II

Roda JC - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
AZ II - half-time state
33% leading42% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.42
Roda JCAZ II
0.42Goals scored (1st half)1.08
Roda JCAZ II
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
Roda JCAZ II
0.83Average goals (1st half)2
Roda JCAZ II
58%Clean sheet before half-time25%
Roda JCAZ II
58%No goal before half-time42%
Roda JCAZ II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1.67
Roda JCAZ II
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
Roda JCAZ II
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
Roda JCAZ II
1.33Average goals (2nd half)2.75
Roda JCAZ II
58%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Roda JCAZ II
42%No goal after half-time25%
Roda JCAZ II

Roda JC - second-half results

42% W42% D17% L
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AZ II - second-half results

50% W17% D33% L
17
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Roda JC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.62.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
AZ II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match1.21.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match2.22.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Roda JC
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
3
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

AZ II
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
8
2
16-30
2
7
31-45
4
5
46-60
4
6
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Roda JC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

AZ II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.74
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).

Teams vs league

Roda JCLigaAZ II
Average goals in match▼ 2.173.59▲ 4.75
Both teams scored▼ 50%69%▲ 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%67%▲ 75%
Clean sheets▲ 33%16%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%83%• 83%
Goal after half-time▼ 75%84%▲ 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.59
Average goals per match
69%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
1.99
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AZ IIYellow cardMathijs Menu
  2. Roda JCSubstitutionOn: Joey SleegersOff: Cain Seedorf
  3. AZ IISubstitutionOn: Saviola SaffoeOff: Kevin Toppenberg
  4. Roda JCYellow cardJérôme Deom
  5. AZ IISubstitutionOn: Bohdan BudkoOff: Hessel de Wit
  6. AZ IIYellow cardJulian Sijbrands
  7. AZ IISubstitutionOn: Jeremiah EsajasOff: Julian Sijbrands
  8. AZ IIYellow cardMathijs Menu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Roda JC 0 - 0 - 2 AZ II. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Roda JC vs AZ II?

The Eerste Divisie match finished Roda JC 2:1 AZ II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Roda JC and AZ II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Roda JC won 0, AZ II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Roda JC vs AZ II?

Roda JC score 1.25 goals per game on average and AZ II 2.58. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Roda JC's matches and 83% of AZ II's.

What form are Roda JC and AZ II in?

Over the last 5 games Roda JC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and AZ II 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Roda JC vs AZ II?

The statistical background for Roda JC vs AZ II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.