Roma vs Como: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Roma played Como in Serie A (Italy). The match was played on 15 December 2025. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Roma: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Como: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Roma scores 1.07 and concedes 0.57 goals per match. Como scores 1.36 and concedes 0.79. League average: 2.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Roma 21%, Como 43%. Over 2.5: Roma 21%, Como 29%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Como has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.54. Roma: 13.1 shots per match, Como: 13.9.

Match halves

Roma: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.57. Como: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Roma: 16-30 (4 goals). Como: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
RomaComo
14Shots13
RomaComo
4Shots on target1
RomaComo
1.58xG1.14
RomaComo
6Corners3
RomaComo
57Dangerous attacks34
RomaComo
16Fouls8
RomaComo
3Cards3
RomaComo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.07Goals scored / match1.36
RomaComo
0.57Goals conceded / match0.79
RomaComo
58%Average possession61%
RomaComo
4.79Shots on target / match5.21
RomaComo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.14Shots per match13.86
RomaComo
4.79Shots on target5.21
RomaComo
8.2%Shot conversion9.8%
RomaComo
58%Possession61%
RomaComo
1.54xG for1.56
RomaComo
1.19xG against1.2
RomaComo

Shooting quality

Roma: BalancedComo: Balanced
RomaComo
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Como is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Roma · 1.6 pts / match - Como

Roma
LWWLL
Season result split
64% W0% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-0-5
1.93 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Como
DDWWL
Season result split
43% W43% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-2
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Como is 27% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - Roma · 1.36 goals / match - Como

Roma is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.57 goals / match - Roma · 0.79 goals / match - Como

Roma scoring profile: mixed

Roma scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Como keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).

Como scoring profile: mixed

Como scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Roma keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).

15Goals scored (season)19
RomaComo
8Goals conceded (season)11
RomaComo
1.64Average goals in match2.14
RomaComo
5Goals scored (last 5)7
RomaComo
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
RomaComo

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal64%
RomaComo
36%2 goals43%
RomaComo
7%3 goals14%
RomaComo
0%4 goals7%
RomaComo

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal57%
RomaComo
0%2 goals7%
RomaComo
0%3 goals7%
RomaComo
0%4 goals7%
RomaComo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time21%
RomaComo
0%BTTS in both halves0%
RomaComo
21%Scored in both halves29%
RomaComo

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
RomaComo
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
RomaComo
20%BTTS - last 520%
RomaComo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
RomaComo
7%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
RomaComo
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
RomaComo

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
RomaComo
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
RomaComo
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
RomaComo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Roma is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.64 pts / match - Roma · 1.43 pts / match - Como

Roma - half-time state
43% leading36% draw21% trailing
Como - half-time state
29% leading57% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.64Points per match (1st half)1.43
RomaComo
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
RomaComo
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
RomaComo
0.79Average goals (1st half)0.86
RomaComo
71%Clean sheet before half-time64%
RomaComo
57%No goal before half-time50%
RomaComo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per match (2nd half)1.57
RomaComo
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
RomaComo
0.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
RomaComo
0.86Average goals (2nd half)1.29
RomaComo
71%Clean sheet after half-time71%
RomaComo
57%No goal after half-time57%
RomaComo

Roma - second-half results

43% W43% D14% L
23
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Como - second-half results

43% W29% D29% L
20
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Roma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Como - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Roma
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
4
0
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Como
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
3
2
46-60
4
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Roma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Como

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

RomaLigaComo
Average goals in match 1.642.34 2.14
Both teams scored 21%48% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 21%44% 29%
Clean sheets 43%32% 43%
Goal before half-time 64%65% 64%
Goal after half-time 57%74% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ComoYellow cardJayden Addai
  2. RomaYellow cardGianluca Mancini
  3. ComoYellow cardNicolás Paz Martínez
  4. ComoYellow cardJacobo Ramón Naveros

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Ermanno FelicianiMatches officiated: 12
2.67Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins8%Draws42%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Roma vs Como?

The Serie A match finished Roma 1:0 Como. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Roma vs Como?

Roma score 1.07 goals per game on average and Como 1.36. The Serie A average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 21% of Roma's matches and 43% of Como's.

What form are Roma and Como in?

Over the last 5 games Roma have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Como 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Roma vs Como?

The statistical background for Roma vs Como — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.