England - EFL League TwoAESSEAL New York StadiumData current as of 24 October 2026

Rotherham United vs Salford City: match statistics

Rotherham United vs Salford City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rotherham United played Salford City in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: AESSEAL New York Stadium. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

Rotherham United: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Salford City: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rotherham United scores 1.20 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Salford City scores 0.80 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rotherham United 80%, Salford City 40%. Over 2.5: Rotherham United 60%, Salford City 40%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Salford City has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.31. Rotherham United: 12.6 shots per match, Salford City: 15.4.

Match halves

Rotherham United: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80. Salford City: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Rotherham United: 76-90+ (3 goals). Salford City: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rotherham United have a clearly stronger home profile: they average 1.5 goals and have lost none of their two home matches, while Salford City have lost both away games. The visitors score just 0.5 goals per away match and failed to score in 50% of those fixtures, despite averaging 13.5 shots. Rotherham are more efficient, converting 13% of their attempts compared with Salford’s 4%, while also allowing opponents an xG of 1.35—lower than the 1.64 Salford concede away from home. Salford enjoy more possession, 58% compared with 37%, but fail to turn it into end product, as demonstrated by just 2 shots on target and an average of 2 goals conceded away. Rotherham’s form over their last five matches, with one win and two draws, is not impressive, but the hosts’ superior efficiency and Salford’s weakness away from home support a 1 result.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Rotherham should create the conditions for a goal, as Salford have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches, concede an average of 2.0 goals away from home, and allow opponents an xG of 1.64. The hosts generate a high home xG of 1.84 and average 4.67 shots on target, although their shooting efficiency is only 6%. Salford’s seasonal average of 0.5 goals is a clear risk, but across their last five matches the team produced an xG of 1.63, while Rotherham conceded an average of 1.4 goals over the same period. BTTS - Yes landed in 80% of Rotherham’s last five matches, compared with 40% for Salford, so the scenario in which both sides score has a moderate yet realistic edge. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically mean a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Rotherham create plenty of chances at home, averaging 1.84 xG and 4.67 shots on target per match, while Salford concede an average of 2.00 goals away from home. At the same time, the hosts convert just 6% of their shots, whereas Salford score only 0.50 goals per away match and produce just 2.00 shots on target. Rotherham’s defence concedes an average of 0.67 goals and has kept a clean sheet in 33% of matches, limiting the visitors’ scoring potential despite their 1.33 xG. Over the last five matches, the teams’ average xG against each other stands at 1.31 and 1.63, but neither side has a profile suggesting a very high-scoring game. The hosts have had under 3.5 goals in 100% of their matches so far, making Under 3.5 the strongest selection with a projected total of 2.45 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Rotherham victory, as the hosts have yet to score before the break, just like Salford, while half-time draws accounted for 67% and 50% of their matches, respectively. Rotherham nevertheless have a clear overall quality advantage: they average 1.0 goals scored and 0.67 conceded, whereas Salford concede as many as 2.0 goals per match and have lost 100% of their away outings to date. The hosts’ superiority is also evident in chance creation, with an average xG of 1.84 compared with the opponents’ 1.33, while shots on target stand at 4.67 versus 2.0. After the break, Rotherham average 1.0 goals and have not lost a single second half, whereas Salford concede an average of 1.0 goal in the second period, favouring a home turnaround after a cautious start.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
20Shots10
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
9Shots on target5
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
2.25xG1.21
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
4Corners3
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
50Dangerous attacks31
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
17Fouls12
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
3Cards3
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Rotherham UnitedSalford City
1.2Goals scored / match0.8
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
1.4Goals conceded / match1.2
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
49%Average possession62%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
3.2Shots on target / match3.6
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.6Shots per match15.4
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
3.2Shots on target3.6
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
9.5%Shot conversion5.2%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
49%Possession62%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
1.31xG for1.63
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
1.28xG against1.32
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

Shooting quality

Rotherham United: BalancedSalford City: Dominant
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
Accuracy (shots on target)25%23%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Salford City is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Rotherham United · 1.2 pts / match - Salford City

Rotherham United
LDWDL
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Salford City
LLLWW
Season result split
40% W0% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rotherham United is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Rotherham United · 0.8 goals / match - Salford City

Salford City is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - Rotherham United · 1.2 goals / match - Salford City

Rotherham United scoring profile: very strong

Rotherham United scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Salford City keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Salford City scoring profile: very strong

Salford City scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Rotherham United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

6Goals scored (season)4
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
7Goals conceded (season)6
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
2.6Average goals in match2
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
6Goals scored (last 5)4
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal60%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
40%2 goals20%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
0%3 goals0%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
0%4 goals0%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal80%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
40%2 goals20%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
0%3 goals20%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
0%4 goals0%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
20%Scored in both halves0%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
80%BTTS - last 540%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rotherham United is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / match - Rotherham United · 0.6 pts / match - Salford City

Rotherham United - half-time state
20% leading20% draw60% trailing
Salford City - half-time state
0% leading60% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)0.6
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
1.2Average goals (1st half)0.6
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
20%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
60%No goal before half-time100%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.6
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
40%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City
40%No goal after half-time40%
Rotherham UnitedSalford City

Rotherham United - second-half results

20% W80% D0% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Salford City - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
3
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rotherham United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Salford City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rotherham United
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Salford City
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rotherham United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Salford City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.83
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
75% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
75%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

Rotherham UnitedLigaSalford City
Average goals in match• 2.602.68▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 80%56%▼ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%50%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▼ 0%26%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%76%▼ 40%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%76%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+48%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+35%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Salford CityGoalRyan GraydonAssist: Luke James Molyneux
  2. Rotherham UnitedYellow cardDenzel Hall
  3. Rotherham UnitedGoalBrandon CoverAssist: Joshua James Austerfield
  4. Rotherham UnitedGoalPaul Philip Mullin
  5. Salford CityYellow cardKallum Xzeiba Tracey Cesay
  6. Rotherham UnitedGoalOssama Ashley
  7. Salford CityYellow cardAbraham Odoh
  8. Salford CitySubstitutionOn: Kelly N’MaiOff: Ryan Graydon
  9. Rotherham UnitedSubstitutionOn: George SebineOff: Fabio Tavares
  10. Rotherham UnitedYellow cardJoshua James Austerfield
  11. Salford CityYellow cardAbraham Odoh
  12. Rotherham UnitedYellow cardJili Buyabu
  13. Salford CityGoalMacaulay Langstaff

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Rotherham United vs Salford City?

The EFL League Two match finished Rotherham United 3:3 Salford City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Rotherham United vs Salford City?

Rotherham United score 1.20 goals per game on average and Salford City 0.80. The EFL League Two average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Rotherham United's matches and 40% of Salford City's.

What form are Rotherham United and Salford City in?

Over the last 5 games Rotherham United have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Salford City 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rotherham United vs Salford City?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.