Rotherham United vs Wycombe Wanderers: match statistics
Rotherham United vs Wycombe Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rotherham United played Wycombe Wanderers in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 29 November 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Rotherham United: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Wycombe Wanderers: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rotherham United scores 1.12 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Wycombe Wanderers scores 1.47 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rotherham United 47%, Wycombe Wanderers 59%. Over 2.5: Rotherham United 53%, Wycombe Wanderers 53%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Wycombe Wanderers has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.05. Rotherham United: 8.8 shots per match, Wycombe Wanderers: 13.2.
Match halves
Rotherham United: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.59. Wycombe Wanderers: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Rotherham United: 46-60 (4 goals). Wycombe Wanderers: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rotherham United | Wycombe Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wycombe Wanderers is 22% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Rotherham United · 2.2 pts / match - Wycombe Wanderers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wycombe Wanderers is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
1.12 goals / match - Rotherham United · 1.47 goals / match - Wycombe Wanderers
Rotherham United scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Wycombe Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Wycombe Wanderers scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Rotherham United keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rotherham United
Over / Under - Wycombe Wanderers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rotherham United is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / match - Rotherham United · 1.24 pts / match - Wycombe Wanderers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rotherham United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 35%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wycombe Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rotherham United
Wycombe Wanderers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Rotherham United | Liga | Wycombe Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.24 | 2.47 | ▲ 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 49% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 47% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | • 29% | 28% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 67% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 83% | • 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Rotherham United vs Wycombe Wanderers?
The EFL League One match finished Rotherham United 1:1 Wycombe Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rotherham United vs Wycombe Wanderers?
Rotherham United score 1.12 goals per game on average and Wycombe Wanderers 1.47. The EFL League One average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Rotherham United's matches and 59% of Wycombe Wanderers's.
What form are Rotherham United and Wycombe Wanderers in?
Over the last 5 games Rotherham United have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Wycombe Wanderers 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rotherham United vs Wycombe Wanderers?
The statistical background for Rotherham United vs Wycombe Wanderers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.