Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo: match statistics

155%(2.15)
X28%(3.50)
217%(3.39)

Royal Antwerp FC holds a clear advantage as the home side with a 42% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference of +4. The hosts demonstrate better offensive efficiency at home (1.58 goals per match) and a more solid defense (1.25 conceded per match) compared to the visitors' away defense (2.0 conceded per match). KVC Westerlo has very poor away form with just a 17% win rate and a negative goal difference of -8, making them vulnerable to defeats. The last five matches of both teams confirm the visitors' weaker form (0.8 points per match) compared to the hosts (1.2 points per match). xG statistics also indicate Antwerp's superiority, who should capitalize on their home advantage and secure the three points.

Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Royal Antwerp FC played KVC Westerlo in Pro League (Belgium). The match was played on 15 February 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Royal Antwerp FC: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. KVC Westerlo: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Royal Antwerp FC scores 1.17 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. KVC Westerlo scores 1.25 and concedes 1.54. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Royal Antwerp FC 46%, KVC Westerlo 38%. Over 2.5: Royal Antwerp FC 38%, KVC Westerlo 38%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

KVC Westerlo has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.37. Royal Antwerp FC: 11.9 shots per match, KVC Westerlo: 14.8.

Match halves

Royal Antwerp FC: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.54. KVC Westerlo: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Royal Antwerp FC: 16-30 (6 goals). KVC Westerlo: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Pro League: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Royal Antwerp FC holds a clear advantage as the home side with a 42% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference of +4. The hosts demonstrate better offensive efficiency at home (1.58 goals per match) and a more solid defense (1.25 conceded per match) compared to the visitors' away defense (2.0 conceded per match). KVC Westerlo has very poor away form with just a 17% win rate and a negative goal difference of -8, making them vulnerable to defeats. The last five matches of both teams confirm the visitors' weaker form (0.8 points per match) compared to the hosts (1.2 points per match). xG statistics also indicate Antwerp's superiority, who should capitalize on their home advantage and secure the three points.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
5Shots12
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
1Shots on target8
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
0.65xG1.66
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
4Corners2
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
34Dangerous attacks46
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
16Fouls14
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
2Cards4
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
1.17Goals scored / match1.25
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
1.08Goals conceded / match1.54
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
49%Average possession49%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
4.42Shots on target / match4.58
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.92Shots per match14.79
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
4.42Shots on target4.58
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
9.8%Shot conversion8.5%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
49%Possession49%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
1.37xG for1.67
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
1.5xG against1.52
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

Shooting quality

Royal Antwerp FC: BalancedKVC Westerlo: Attacking
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
Accuracy (shots on target)37%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Royal Antwerp FC is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Royal Antwerp FC · 0.8 pts / match - KVC Westerlo

Royal Antwerp FC
WLLWL
Season result split
33% W25% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-10
1.25 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
KVC Westerlo
LLDWL
Season result split
29% W29% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-10
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-5
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KVC Westerlo is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.17 goals / match - Royal Antwerp FC · 1.25 goals / match - KVC Westerlo

Royal Antwerp FC is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.08 goals / match - Royal Antwerp FC · 1.54 goals / match - KVC Westerlo

Royal Antwerp FC scoring profile: strong

Royal Antwerp FC scores in 63% of matches (15 of 24 matches), while KVC Westerlo keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).

KVC Westerlo scoring profile: strong

KVC Westerlo scores in 58% of matches (14 of 24 matches), while Royal Antwerp FC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).

28Goals scored (season)30
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
26Goals conceded (season)37
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
2.25Average goals in match2.79
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
6Goals scored (last 5)2
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
6Goals conceded (last 5)9
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal58%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
33%2 goals38%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
17%3 goals17%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
4%4 goals8%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal71%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
29%2 goals42%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
0%3 goals17%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
0%4 goals17%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
Royal Antwerp FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 24 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time8%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
25%Scored in both halves29%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
20%BTTS - last 520%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KVC Westerlo is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Royal Antwerp FC · 1.42 pts / match - KVC Westerlo

Royal Antwerp FC - half-time state
25% leading46% draw29% trailing
KVC Westerlo - half-time state
42% leading17% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.42
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.42
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
46%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
50%No goal before half-time58%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.25
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.38
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
58%Clean sheet after half-time54%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo
63%No goal after half-time54%
Royal Antwerp FCKVC Westerlo

Royal Antwerp FC - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
29
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KVC Westerlo - second-half results

29% W38% D33% L
34
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding69%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Royal Antwerp FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
KVC Westerlo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match1.80.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Royal Antwerp FC
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
6
4
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

KVC Westerlo
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
4
5
16-30
4
12
31-45
6
3
46-60
6
4
61-75
4
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Royal Antwerp FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

KVC Westerlo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

Royal Antwerp FCLigaKVC Westerlo
Average goals in match 2.252.59 2.79
Both teams scored 46%54% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%45% 38%
Clean sheets 21%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 79%72% 83%
Goal after half-time 67%73% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KVC WesterloGoalAllahyar Sayyadmanesh
  2. Royal Antwerp FCYellow cardYuto Tsunashima
  3. KVC WesterloYellow cardBryan Reynolds
  4. Royal Antwerp FCSubstitutionOn: Isaac BabadiOff: Dennis Praet
  5. KVC WesterloGoalBryan ReynoldsAssist: Allahyar Sayyadmanesh
  6. KVC WesterloYellow cardJosimar Alcócer
  7. Royal Antwerp FCSubstitutionOn: Anthony Lenin Valencia BajañaOff: Gerard Vandeplas
  8. KVC WesterloYellow cardClinton Nsiala-Makengo
  9. Royal Antwerp FCSubstitutionOn: Glenn BijlOff: Daam Wonnebald Foulon
  10. Royal Antwerp FCYellow cardAnthony Lenin Valencia Bajaña
  11. KVC WesterloYellow cardRoman Petrovich Neustädter

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Bert VerbekeMatches officiated: 21
3.33Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins10%Draws52%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Royal Antwerp FC 0 - 0 - 1 KVC Westerlo. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

KVC Westerlo
2 : 0
Royal Antwerp FC

FAQ

What was the result of Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo?

The Pro League match finished Royal Antwerp FC 0:2 KVC Westerlo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo?

Royal Antwerp FC score 1.17 goals per game on average and KVC Westerlo 1.25. The Pro League average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Royal Antwerp FC's matches and 38% of KVC Westerlo's.

What form are Royal Antwerp FC and KVC Westerlo in?

Over the last 5 games Royal Antwerp FC have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and KVC Westerlo 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo?

The statistical background for Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.