Morocco - Botola ProStade Municipal de BerkaneData current as of 23 July 2026

RSB Berkane vs CR Khemis Zemamra: match statistics

RSB Berkane vs CR Khemis Zemamra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RSB Berkane play CR Khemis Zemamra in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 19:00. Venue: Stade Municipal de Berkane. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

RSB Berkane: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. CR Khemis Zemamra: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

RSB Berkane scores 1.43 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. CR Khemis Zemamra scores 0.97 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RSB Berkane 53%, CR Khemis Zemamra 53%. Over 2.5: RSB Berkane 43%, CR Khemis Zemamra 43%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

RSB Berkane has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.32. RSB Berkane: 10.7 shots per match, CR Khemis Zemamra: 10.4.

Match halves

RSB Berkane: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.67. CR Khemis Zemamra: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

RSB Berkane: 31-45+ (12 goals). CR Khemis Zemamra: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

RSB Berkane holds a clear advantage in chance quality and efficiency: at home they average 1.8 goals per game, 4.7 on-target shots from 12.5 attempts and a 14% conversion, while CR Khemis Zemamra away records 1.2 goals, 3.6 on-target shots and a 10% conversion. The defensive differential favours the hosts — Berkane concedes 1.2 goals per home match on average, whereas opponents concede 1.8 goals on the road; average xG is 1.67 for the hosts versus 1.35 for the visitors. Form over the last 5 matches also supports the hosts: Berkane scored 9 goals and averages 2.0 points per game in their last 5, while Khemis has 5 goals and 1.4 points per game. Additionally, the hosts win 60% of home matches, lose only 10% and have 10% of matches without scoring, whereas the visitors lose 60% of away matches and have 30% of matches without a goal. Considering higher seasonal efficiency (30 goals vs 19), superior xG (1.67 vs 1.35) and form advantage, I allocate higher probabilities to the hosts: Home 65%, Draw 20%, Away 15%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
9Shots5
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
3Shots on target0
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
1.28xG0.76
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
5Corners5
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
69Dangerous attacks61
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
9Fouls10
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
1Cards2
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
1.43Goals scored / match0.97
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
0.93Goals conceded / match1.2
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
54%Average possession47%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
3.77Shots on target / match3.4
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.7Shots per match10.4
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
3.77Shots on target3.4
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
13.4%Shot conversion9.3%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
54%Possession47%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
1.43xG for1.32
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
1.26xG against1.29
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

Shooting quality

RSB Berkane: Efficient finishingCR Khemis Zemamra: Balanced
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

RSB Berkane is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - RSB Berkane · 0.8 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

RSB Berkane
WDLWW
Season result split
50% W30% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-9-6
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-5-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
CR Khemis Zemamra
LDDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RSB Berkane is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1.43 goals / match - RSB Berkane · 0.97 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

RSB Berkane is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.93 goals / match - RSB Berkane · 1.2 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

RSB Berkane scoring profile: very strong

RSB Berkane scores in 80% of matches (24 of 30 matches), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

CR Khemis Zemamra scoring profile: strong

CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while RSB Berkane keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

43Goals scored (season)29
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
28Goals conceded (season)36
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
2.37Average goals in match2.17
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
10Goals scored (last 5)3
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal63%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
43%2 goals27%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
13%3 goals7%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
7%4 goals0%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal73%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
20%2 goals30%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
7%3 goals13%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
0%4 goals3%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
CR Khemis Zemamra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 30 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time13%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
7%BTTS in both halves3%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
20%Scored in both halves17%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
80%BTTS - last 560%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RSB Berkane is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.63 pts / match - RSB Berkane · 0.9 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra

RSB Berkane - half-time state
37% leading53% draw10% trailing
CR Khemis Zemamra - half-time state
13% leading50% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.63Points per match (1st half)0.9
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
0.77Goals scored (1st half)0.3
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
1.1Average goals (1st half)0.87
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
70%Clean sheet before half-time50%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
57%No goal before half-time73%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.33
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.3
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
47%Clean sheet after half-time50%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra
43%No goal after half-time47%
RSB BerkaneCR Khemis Zemamra

RSB Berkane - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
49
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results

30% W43% R27% P
27
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

RSB Berkane - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
CR Khemis Zemamra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RSB Berkane
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
5
4
16-30
12
2
31-45
3
2
46-60
8
5
61-75
9
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

CR Khemis Zemamra
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
11
31-45
4
1
46-60
8
6
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.26
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RSB Berkane

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

CR Khemis Zemamra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

RSB BerkaneLigaCR Khemis Zemamra
Average goals in match 2.372.17 2.17
Both teams scored 53%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%38% 43%
Clean sheets 33%30% 27%
Goal before half-time 53%63% 63%
Goal after half-time 83%73% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RSB Berkane 0 - 0 - 1 CR Khemis Zemamra. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of RSB Berkane vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

The Botola Pro match finished RSB Berkane 1:0 CR Khemis Zemamra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RSB Berkane vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

RSB Berkane score 1.43 goals per game on average and CR Khemis Zemamra 0.97. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 53% of RSB Berkane's matches and 53% of CR Khemis Zemamra's.

What form are RSB Berkane and CR Khemis Zemamra in?

Over the last 5 games RSB Berkane have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and CR Khemis Zemamra 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RSB Berkane vs CR Khemis Zemamra?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.