Morocco - Botola ProStade Municipal de BerkaneData current as of 06 September 2026

RSB Berkane vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics

RSB Berkane crest
RSB Berkane
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Ittihad Tanger crest
Ittihad Tanger

RSB Berkane vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RSB Berkane played Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 8 June 2026. Venue: Stade Municipal de Berkane. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

RSB Berkane: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Ittihad Tanger: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

RSB Berkane scores 1.45 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.86 and concedes 1.09. League average: 2.15 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RSB Berkane 55%, Ittihad Tanger 59%. Over 2.5: RSB Berkane 41%, Ittihad Tanger 27%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

RSB Berkane has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.29. RSB Berkane: 11.4 shots per match, Ittihad Tanger: 10.6.

Match halves

RSB Berkane: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.73. Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

RSB Berkane: 76-90+ (8 goals). Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.15 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

RSB Berkane is the clear favorite in this match: at home they average 1.73 goals per game and have a 64% home win rate, while Ittihad Tanger average only 0.91 goals on the road and win 27% of away matches. The hosts create higher quality chances — RSB’s home xG is 1.63 versus opponents’ xG 1.12 (difference +0.51), whereas Ittihad’s away xG is 1.3 and their opponents generate 1.47 against them (difference -0.17). RSB attempt more shots (12.18 vs 10.36) and more shots on target (4.55 vs 3.27) and convert them more efficiently (14% vs 9%); this season hosts have scored 32 goals versus the visitors’ 19. Defense also favors the hosts — they concede 1.09 goals per home game compared to Ittihad conceding 1.18 on the road, and the clean sheet rate is 9% for RSB versus 36% for Ittihad. Considering form (RSB with 4 wins and 1 draw in the last 5, averaging 2.6 points per game, while Ittihad have 2 wins and 3 draws averaging 1.8 points per game), superior xG and efficiency, I predict a home win; recommended probability distribution: 65% RSB, 20% draw, 15% Ittihad.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season-long metrics strongly support BTTS: RSB Berkane has BTTS in 64% of matches, while Ittihad Tanger in 55%, both above the league average of 51%. Both teams generate similar xG — 1.29 (Berkane) and 1.30 (Ittihad) — totaling around 2.59 xG per match, with xG against of 1.38 and 1.47 respectively, meaning they create chances while also exposing themselves to conceding. The visitors keep a clean sheet in only 9% of games, and the hosts in 27%, indicating Ittihad concedes in 91% of matches and rarely records a clean sheet. In the last 5 matches Berkane averages 1.6 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while Ittihad averages 1.0 scored and 0.6 conceded; recent BTTS rates are 40% for the hosts and 60% for the visitors, which short-term favors a both teams to score scenario. Considering season-long 64%/55%, the low away clean sheet rate of 9%, combined xG ~2.59 and shots on target 2.82 vs 3.27, I estimate a 65% probability for BTTS - Yes and 35% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Season-long stats show both teams have 73% of matches with over 1.5 goals, and the league averages 2.16 goals per game — a strong signal for at least 2 goals. In the last 5 matches RSB Berkane scores 1.6 goals on average, Ittihad Tanger 1.0, totaling 2.6 goals in form, which confirms an offensive tendency. xG analysis gives (1.29 + 1.47)/2 = 1.38 expected goals for the home side and (1.30 + 1.38)/2 = 1.34 for the visitors, totaling 2.72 xG for the match. Using a Poisson distribution with λ=2.72 yields roughly a 75% chance of Over 1.5, about 51% for Over 2.5 and about 29% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest and most justified betting line is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The primary signal is a draw at half-time: the home side were level at the break in 82% of matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 82.0), and home teams kept clean halves in 73% of games (seasonCSPercentageHT_home = 73.0), with an average of 0.27 goals by each team at half-time (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.27; scoredAVGHT_away = 0.27). Full-time also appears most likely to be a draw, as the home side draw 64% of matches (drawPercentage_home = 64.0), the xG figures are almost identical 1.29 versus 1.30 (xg_for_avg_home = 1.29; xg_for_avg_away = 1.3), and shots on target are low: 2.82 vs 3.27 (shotsOnTargetAVG_home = 2.82; shotsOnTargetAVG_away = 3.27). The home side’s form over the last five matches is strong (4 wins and 1 draw, last5_winPercentage_overall_home = 80.0; form_l5_home = dwwww), so from a half-time draw there is a significant but not dominant chance of a home turnaround in the second half — hence the X/1 scenario was assigned 25%. Home leads at the break are historically rare (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 9.0), and similarly the home side are trailing at the break in 9.0% of matches (trailingAtHTPercentage_home = 9.0), which is why scenarios starting 1/* and 2/* were each given only 9% of the combined probability. As a result the single most likely pick is X/X at 50%, with X/1 second at 25%, reflecting the concurrent high incidence of half-time draws and the home side’s superior second-half form.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
7Shots12
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
5Shots on target4
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
1.62xG1.97
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
1Corners6
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
112Dangerous attacks128
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
9Fouls12
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
1Cards2
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
1.45Goals scored / match0.86
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
0.95Goals conceded / match1.09
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
54%Average possession49%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
3.77Shots on target / match3.05
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.41Shots per match10.59
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
3.77Shots on target3.05
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
12.7%Shot conversion8.2%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
54%Possession49%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
1.46xG for1.29
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
1.23xG against1.42
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

Shooting quality

RSB Berkane: BalancedIttihad Tanger: Balanced
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
Accuracy (shots on target)33%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

RSB Berkane is 44% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - RSB Berkane · 1.8 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

RSB Berkane
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W32% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-4
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Ittihad Tanger
DDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W50% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-11-6
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RSB Berkane is 69% better for: goals scored per match.

1.45 goals / match - RSB Berkane · 0.86 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

RSB Berkane is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.95 goals / match - RSB Berkane · 1.09 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

RSB Berkane scoring profile: very strong

RSB Berkane scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while RSB Berkane keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

32Goals scored (season)19
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
21Goals conceded (season)24
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
2.41Average goals in match1.95
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
8Goals scored (last 5)5
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal68%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
41%2 goals18%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
14%3 goals0%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
9%4 goals0%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal82%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
18%2 goals23%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
9%3 goals5%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time9%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
5%BTTS in both halves0%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
23%Scored in both halves5%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
40%BTTS - last 560%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RSB Berkane is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.64 pts / match - RSB Berkane · 1.05 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

RSB Berkane - half-time state
36% leading55% draw9% trailing
Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.64Points per match (1st half)1.05
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.27
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
1.05Average goals (1st half)0.73
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
73%Clean sheet before half-time59%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
59%No goal before half-time73%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.23
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.23
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
45%Clean sheet after half-time45%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger
36%No goal after half-time55%
RSB BerkaneIttihad Tanger

RSB Berkane - second-half results

41% W27% R32% P
36
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

27% W41% R32% P
23
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RSB Berkane - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RSB Berkane
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
7
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
7
4
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
2
7
31-45
3
5
46-60
3
5
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RSB Berkane

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.78
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

RSB BerkaneLigaIttihad Tanger
Average goals in match 2.412.15 1.95
Both teams scored 55%51% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%38% 27%
Clean sheets 32%31% 18%
Goal before half-time 50%61% 59%
Goal after half-time 91%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.15
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ittihad TangerYellow cardHamza El Moudene
  2. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Faouzi Abd El MouttalibOff: Ennaama El Bellali
  3. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Oussama Al AizOff: Zakaria Kiani
  4. Ittihad TangerYellow cardBilal ElOuadghiri
  5. RSB BerkaneGoalOussama Lamlaoui
  6. RSB BerkaneYellow cardYoussef Mehri
  7. RSB BerkaneSubstitutionOn: Youness El KaabiOff: Oussama Lamlaoui
  8. RSB BerkaneSubstitutionOn: Amine El MaswabOff: Mounir Chouiar

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RSB Berkane 0 - 0 - 1 Ittihad Tanger. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Ittihad Tanger
1 : 0
RSB Berkane

FAQ

What was the result of RSB Berkane vs Ittihad Tanger?

The Botola Pro match finished RSB Berkane 1:0 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RSB Berkane vs Ittihad Tanger?

RSB Berkane score 1.45 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.86. The Botola Pro average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 55% of RSB Berkane's matches and 59% of Ittihad Tanger's.

What form are RSB Berkane and Ittihad Tanger in?

Over the last 5 games RSB Berkane have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RSB Berkane vs Ittihad Tanger?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.