RSB Berkane vs UTS Rabat: match statistics
RSB Berkane vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
RSB Berkane played UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 7 May 2026. Final score: 4:3.
Current form
RSB Berkane: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. UTS Rabat: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
RSB Berkane scores 1.39 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 0.94 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.14 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: RSB Berkane 61%, UTS Rabat 72%. Over 2.5: RSB Berkane 44%, UTS Rabat 28%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
RSB Berkane has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.21. RSB Berkane: 11.8 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 9.1.
Match halves
RSB Berkane: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.72. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
RSB Berkane: 61-75 (7 goals). UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.14 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
RSB Berkane has a clear table and offensive advantage: they sit 5th with 25 goals this season versus UTS Rabat in 14th with 17 goals. At home Berkane averages 1.56 goals, 57% possession and 4.56 shots on target with an average xG of 1.69, while UTS away records 0.75 goals, 47% possession, 3.75 shots on target and xG 1.34. Defensively the hosts concede 1.0 goal per home match on average (xG against 1.08) and have conceded only 3 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas the visitors concede 1.25 goals away (xG against 1.42) and as many as 9 goals in their last 5 games. The visitors have kept 0% clean sheets on the road and failed to score in 38% of away fixtures, while the hosts failed to score in only 11% of home appearances, indicating superior efficiency for Berkane. Considering a 56% home win rate versus 13% away win rate for UTS and the advantage in xG and possession, I expect a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have high BTTS rates this season: RSB Berkane 80% and UTS Rabat 63%, exceeding the league average of 49%, so matches involving them historically see goals from both sides. In the last 5 games UTS Rabat has BTTS 80%, scoring on average 1.4 and conceding 1.8 (7 scored, 9 conceded), whereas RSB Berkane in the last 5 has BTTS 40%, scoring 0.8 and conceding 0.6 (4-3), which indicates the visitors have recently been more likely to be involved in goal exchanges. xG and shot numbers confirm both sides create chances: UTS xG 1.34 vs xG against RSB 1.51 and RSB xG 1.13 vs xG against UTS 1.42, with average shots 9.5 vs 8.7 and shots on target 3.75 vs 3.4, suggesting realistic scoring opportunities for both. Additionally both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, and seasonal goal totals are 25 scored and 18 conceded for the home side and 17 scored and 27 conceded for the visitors, which underlines a propensity for goals. Considering the seasonal BTTS rates (80% and 63%), UTS’s strong offensive form over the last 5 matches and the above xG and shot data, I recommend BTTS - Yes (70%) vs No (30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining the attack xG with the opponent’s defensive xG yields 1.28 xG for RSB Berkane ((1.13 + 1.42)/2) and 1.43 xG for UTS Rabat ((1.34 + 1.51)/2), totaling 2.71 expected goals. Season-long metrics strongly support Over 1.5 — RSB has 100% of home matches with over 1.5 goals, UTS 75% away, and BTTS occurred in 80% of RSB’s matches and 63% of UTS’s matches, reinforcing the signal for more than 1.5 goals. The 2.5 line is more balanced: seasonally Over 2.5 is only 30% for RSB and 25% for UTS, and in the last 5 matches both teams have scored a combined 11 goals (4 + 7), i.e. 2.2 goals per game; therefore Over 2.5 has only a moderate edge (~55%). Over 3.5 is unlikely — seasonally 20% for the home side and 0% for the away side, and the expected 2.71 goals is well below 3.5, so Under 3.5 has a strong edge. In summary: the best pick is Over 1.5 (strong backing 100%/75% and xG 2.71), while for the 2.5 and 3.5 lines I recommend caution due to low seasonal frequencies of Over.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the most likely outcome is a draw – the home side were level at the break in 60% of matches, the visitors in 50%, with average first-half goals of 1.2 for the hosts versus 0.88 for the away team. After the break I favour the hosts: in the last five matches the home side won 40% of fixtures compared to 20% for the visitors, and the hosts’ average points by half-time are 1.2 versus 0.5 for the away team, indicating superior control and point accumulation. Additionally, the hosts have a higher shot conversion rate (13% vs 8%) and 90% of their matches featured at least one goal after the break, while 80% of the hosts’ matches saw both teams scoring, which supports second-half decisions. Based on this, the most reliable scenario is a draw at half-time with a home win at full-time (X/1 30%), followed by a maintained draw (X/X 22%) and the hosts leading from the start (1/1 14%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| RSB Berkane | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
RSB Berkane is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - RSB Berkane · 1 pts / match - UTS Rabat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RSB Berkane is 48% better for: goals scored per match.
1.39 goals / match - RSB Berkane · 0.94 goals / match - UTS Rabat
RSB Berkane is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - RSB Berkane · 1.5 goals / match - UTS Rabat
RSB Berkane scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 18 matches).
UTS Rabat scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while RSB Berkane keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RSB Berkane
Over / Under - UTS Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RSB Berkane is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / match - RSB Berkane · 0.89 pts / match - UTS Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RSB Berkane - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 6%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
RSB Berkane
UTS Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| RSB Berkane | Liga | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.39 | 2.14 | ▲ 2.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 49% | ▲ 72% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 44% | 38% | ▼ 28% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 32% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 60% | • 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 75% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: RSB Berkane 0 - 1 - 0 UTS Rabat. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of RSB Berkane vs UTS Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished RSB Berkane 4:3 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RSB Berkane vs UTS Rabat?
RSB Berkane score 1.39 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 0.94. The Botola Pro average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 61% of RSB Berkane's matches and 72% of UTS Rabat's.
What form are RSB Berkane and UTS Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games RSB Berkane have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and UTS Rabat 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RSB Berkane vs UTS Rabat?
The statistical background for RSB Berkane vs UTS Rabat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


