Poland - 1. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Ruch Chorzów vs Stal Mielec: match statistics

Ruch Chorzów crest
Ruch Chorzów
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Stal Mielec crest
Stal Mielec
155%(1.91)
X25%(3.91)
220%(3.20)

Ruch Chorzów presents a definitely better home form with a 58% win rate and a positive +8 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.92 goals per home match while conceding only 1.25 goals, which proves a solid defense. Stal Mielec has very poor away results - a 58% defeat rate, a negative goal difference of -11, and an average of 2.25 goals conceded per match. Ruch's advantage in xG (1.66 vs 1.43 for the visitors) and ball possession (52% vs 50%) additionally supports the thesis of a home win. Although both teams have identical form in the last 5 matches (1.4 PPG), home and away statistics clearly favor Ruch Chorzów, although Stal's experience in scoring goals may make the match more even than the overall numbers indicate.

Ruch Chorzów vs Stal Mielec: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ruch Chorzów play Stal Mielec in 1. Liga (Poland). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 19:30. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Ruch Chorzów: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Stal Mielec: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ruch Chorzów scores 1.59 and concedes 1.35 goals per match. Stal Mielec scores 1.50 and concedes 1.82. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ruch Chorzów 68%, Stal Mielec 74%. Over 2.5: Ruch Chorzów 62%, Stal Mielec 71%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Ruch Chorzów has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.47. Ruch Chorzów: 14.4 shots per match, Stal Mielec: 12.4.

Match halves

Ruch Chorzów: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.68. Stal Mielec: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Ruch Chorzów: 0-15 (12 goals). Stal Mielec: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Ruch Chorzów presents a definitely better home form with a 58% win rate and a positive +8 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.92 goals per home match while conceding only 1.25 goals, which proves a solid defense. Stal Mielec has very poor away results - a 58% defeat rate, a negative goal difference of -11, and an average of 2.25 goals conceded per match. Ruch's advantage in xG (1.66 vs 1.43 for the visitors) and ball possession (52% vs 50%) additionally supports the thesis of a home win. Although both teams have identical form in the last 5 matches (1.4 PPG), home and away statistics clearly favor Ruch Chorzów, although Stal's experience in scoring goals may make the match more even than the overall numbers indicate.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
13Shots11
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
4Shots on target6
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
1.51xG1.46
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
7Corners4
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
56Dangerous attacks47
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
9Fouls9
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
1Cards2
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
1.59Goals scored / match1.5
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
1.35Goals conceded / match1.82
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
50%Average possession51%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
4.15Shots on target / match3.74
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.38Shots per match12.41
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
4.15Shots on target3.74
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
11%Shot conversion12.1%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
50%Possession51%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
1.63xG for1.47
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
1.55xG against1.66
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

Shooting quality

Ruch Chorzów: AttackingStal Mielec: Balanced
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
Accuracy (shots on target)29%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ruch Chorzów is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Ruch Chorzów · 1.4 pts / match - Stal Mielec

Ruch Chorzów
DWWWL
Season result split
41% W32% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-11-9
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Stal Mielec
LLDWW
Season result split
29% W18% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-18
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-10
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ruch Chorzów is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.59 goals / match - Ruch Chorzów · 1.5 goals / match - Stal Mielec

Ruch Chorzów is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.35 goals / match - Ruch Chorzów · 1.82 goals / match - Stal Mielec

Ruch Chorzów scoring profile: very strong

Ruch Chorzów scores in 88% of matches (30 of 34 matches), while Stal Mielec keeps a clean sheet in 12% (4 of 34 matches).

Stal Mielec scoring profile: very strong

Stal Mielec scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Ruch Chorzów keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

54Goals scored (season)51
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
46Goals conceded (season)62
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
2.94Average goals in match3.32
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
12Goals scored (last 5)10
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal82%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
56%2 goals38%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
9%3 goals18%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
6%4 goals9%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal88%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
41%2 goals56%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
15%3 goals24%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
3%4 goals12%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
15%BTTS in both halves3%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
35%Scored in both halves21%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
60%BTTS - last 580%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ruch Chorzów is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.59 pts / match - Ruch Chorzów · 1.21 pts / match - Stal Mielec

Ruch Chorzów - half-time state
41% leading35% draw24% trailing
Stal Mielec - half-time state
29% leading32% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.59Points per match (1st half)1.21
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
0.91Goals scored (1st half)0.71
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
1.53Average goals (1st half)1.59
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
53%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
35%No goal before half-time50%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1.26
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
1.41Average goals (2nd half)1.74
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
41%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec
41%No goal after half-time47%
Ruch ChorzówStal Mielec

Ruch Chorzów - second-half results

32% W38% R29% P
54
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Stal Mielec - second-half results

32% W29% R38% P
41
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ruch Chorzów - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match2.21.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+5+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8
Stal Mielec - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ruch Chorzów
ScoredConceded
12
9
0-15
7
3
16-30
12
9
31-45
6
11
46-60
9
6
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Stal Mielec
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
9
10
16-30
11
14
31-45
5
9
46-60
10
6
61-75
12
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ruch Chorzów

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Stal Mielec

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Ruch ChorzówLigaStal Mielec
Average goals in match 2.942.98 3.32
Both teams scored 68%65% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%60% 71%
Clean sheets 24%20% 12%
Goal before half-time 82%74% 82%
Goal after half-time 85%81% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ruch Chorzów 0 - 1 - 0 Stal Mielec. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FKS Stal Mielec
2 : 2
KS Ruch Chorzów

FAQ

What was the result of Ruch Chorzów vs Stal Mielec?

The 1. Liga match finished Ruch Chorzów 2:1 Stal Mielec. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ruch Chorzów vs Stal Mielec?

Ruch Chorzów score 1.59 goals per game on average and Stal Mielec 1.50. The 1. Liga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Ruch Chorzów's matches and 74% of Stal Mielec's.

What form are Ruch Chorzów and Stal Mielec in?

Over the last 5 games Ruch Chorzów have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Stal Mielec 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ruch Chorzów vs Stal Mielec?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.