Slovenia - 2. SNLŠtadion Ob JezeruData current as of 02 September 2026

Rudar vs Bilje: match statistics

Rudar crest
Rudar
4 : 1half-time 1:1
Bilje crest
Bilje

Rudar vs Bilje: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rudar played Bilje in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Štadion Ob Jezeru. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Rudar: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match. Bilje: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rudar scores 1.00 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Bilje scores 2.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.88 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rudar 0%, Bilje 100%. Over 2.5: Rudar 33%, Bilje 100%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

Bilje has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.31. Rudar: 10.7 shots per match, Bilje: 8.7.

Match halves

Rudar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. Bilje: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Rudar: 76-90+ (2 goals). Bilje: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.88 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Bilje sit 5th, while Rudar are 12th, and in the last five meetings the visitors have recorded 3 wins compared with 2 victories for the hosts. Bilje create significantly more chances away from home: their average xG stands at 2.04, compared with Rudar’s 1.24 at home, while the number of shots on target is 8 versus 3. Both teams have won their only match so far in the respective venue role, but Bilje average 3 goals scored away from home and have never failed to find the net in such a match. Rudar have a strong defensive argument, having yet to concede at home, with their opponents generating an average xG of 1.00; however, Bilje should create chances more frequently. The visitors’ weaker defence, allowing an average xG of 1.70, gives the hosts a realistic chance of scoring, but Bilje’s greater creative potential points towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal data clearly support goals from both sides: Rudar and Bilje have a BTTS rate of 100%, and neither team has kept a clean sheet yet. Bilje score an average of 3.0 goals per match and register 8.0 shots on target, while Rudar concede an average of 2.5 goals, making an away goal highly probable. The hosts score an average of 1.5 goals, and their last five matches produced 1.6 goals per game with an xG of 1.46, providing solid grounds for breaking down Bilje’s defence. The visitors’ defence also allows an average xG of 1.70, despite conceding only 1.6 goals per match across their last five games. Rudar’s latest BTTS figure stands at 0%, but the stronger seasonal data and Bilje’s attacking profile, with BTTS landing in 80% of their last five matches, point towards the “BTTS - Yes” scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Bilje possesses a clearly greater attacking potential in the season data, scoring an average of 3.0 goals from 2.04 xG, while Rudar concedes an average of 2.5 goals. In their last five matches, both teams have also maintained their goal production: Rudar averaged 1.6 goals, while Bilje averaged 1.8. The xG profiles support a scenario of at least two goals, as Rudar creates an average of 1.46 xG, while its defense allows opponents 1.74 xG; Bilje, meanwhile, records 1.22 xG in attack. Each team exceeded the 1.5-goal threshold in 100% of the available season matches, while both sides scored and conceded in every one of them. The strongest selection is Over 1.5, as the line requires only two goals and has significantly stronger statistical support than the more demanding Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Bilje have a clear quality advantage: they have won 100% of their matches so far, averaging 3.0 goals and 8.0 shots on target per game, compared with Rudar’s 1.5 goals and 3.0 shots on target. The visitors led at the break in 60% of their last five matches and did not lose any first half during that period, while Rudar were behind after 45 minutes in 60% of their appearances. The difference in average xG—2.04 for Bilje versus 1.14 for the hosts—supports the scenario of the away side taking control early. Rudar concede an average of 2.5 goals per match, while Bilje have averaged 2.0 goals before half-time in the seasonal data, making it most likely that the visitors will maintain their lead until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
RudarBilje
22Shots10
RudarBilje
8Shots on target2
RudarBilje
2.57xG1.08
RudarBilje
8Corners3
RudarBilje
86Dangerous attacks43
RudarBilje
12Fouls13
RudarBilje
0Cards0
RudarBilje

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match2
RudarBilje
1.33Goals conceded / match2
RudarBilje
49%Average possession51%
RudarBilje
3Shots on target / match4.67
RudarBilje

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.67Shots per match8.67
RudarBilje
3Shots on target4.67
RudarBilje
9.4%Shot conversion23.1%
RudarBilje
49%Possession51%
RudarBilje
1.31xG for1.59
RudarBilje
1.78xG against1.7
RudarBilje

Shooting quality

Rudar: BalancedBilje: Efficient finishing
RudarBilje
Accuracy (shots on target)28%54%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Bilje is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Rudar · 2 pts / match - Bilje

Rudar
LWL
Season result split
33% W0% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 33%
Bilje
WWL
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bilje is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Rudar · 2 goals / match - Bilje

Rudar is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Rudar · 2 goals / match - Bilje

Rudar scoring profile: strong

Rudar scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Bilje keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Bilje scoring profile: very strong

Bilje scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

3Goals scored (season)6
RudarBilje
4Goals conceded (season)6
RudarBilje
2.33Average goals in match4
RudarBilje
3Goals scored (last 5)6
RudarBilje
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
RudarBilje

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal100%
RudarBilje
33%2 goals67%
RudarBilje
33%3 goals33%
RudarBilje
0%4 goals0%
RudarBilje

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
RudarBilje
67%2 goals33%
RudarBilje
0%3 goals33%
RudarBilje
0%4 goals33%
RudarBilje

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
RudarBilje
0%BTTS in both halves0%
RudarBilje
0%Scored in both halves67%
RudarBilje

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
RudarBilje
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RudarBilje
0%BTTS - last 5100%
RudarBilje

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
RudarBilje
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
RudarBilje
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
RudarBilje

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
RudarBilje
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
RudarBilje
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
RudarBilje

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bilje is 606% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.33 pts / match - Rudar · 2.33 pts / match - Bilje

Rudar - half-time state
0% leading33% draw67% trailing
Bilje - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.33Points per match (1st half)2.33
RudarBilje
0Goals scored (1st half)1
RudarBilje
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0
RudarBilje
0.67Average goals (1st half)1
RudarBilje
33%Clean sheet before half-time100%
RudarBilje
100%No goal before half-time33%
RudarBilje

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.67
RudarBilje
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
RudarBilje
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)2
RudarBilje
1.67Average goals (2nd half)3
RudarBilje
33%Clean sheet after half-time0%
RudarBilje
67%No goal after half-time0%
RudarBilje

Rudar - second-half results

33% W0% R67% P
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.33
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bilje - second-half results

0% W67% R33% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+2.0

Concedes 2.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Rudar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.331.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.70.7
Average goals in match0.71.7
1 goal67%100%
2 goals0%33%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal100%67%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 33% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 0% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Bilje - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.330.67
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.02.0
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal67%100%
2 goals33%100%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal33%0%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Bilje
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

Bilje

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

RudarLigaBilje
Average goals in match 2.332.88 4.00
Both teams scored 0%38% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%58% 100%
Clean sheets 33%33% 0%
Goal before half-time 67%77% 67%
Goal after half-time 100%85% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.88
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Rudar 1 - 0 - 1 Bilje. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

NK Rudar Velenje
5 : 0
NK Bilje
NK Bilje
2 : 1
NK Rudar Velenje

FAQ

What was the result of Rudar vs Bilje?

The 2. SNL match finished Rudar 4:1 Bilje. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rudar and Bilje?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rudar won 1, Bilje won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rudar vs Bilje?

Rudar score 1.00 goals per game on average and Bilje 2.00. The 2. SNL average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Rudar's matches and 100% of Bilje's.

What form are Rudar and Bilje in?

Over the last 5 games Rudar have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Bilje 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudar vs Bilje?

The statistical background for Rudar vs Bilje — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.