Slovenia - 2. SNLŠtadion Ob JezeruData current as of 16 October 2026

Rudar vs Dravinja: match statistics

Rudar crest
Rudar
3 : 1half-time 2:0
Dravinja crest
Dravinja

Rudar vs Dravinja: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rudar played Dravinja in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 28 September 2026. Venue: Štadion Ob Jezeru. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Rudar: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Dravinja: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rudar scores 2.14 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Dravinja scores 1.00 and concedes 2.43. League average: 2.90 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rudar 43%, Dravinja 71%. Over 2.5: Rudar 57%, Dravinja 57%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Rudar has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.52. Rudar: 13.7 shots per match, Dravinja: 10.9.

Match halves

Rudar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.71. Dravinja: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Rudar: 61-75 (5 goals). Dravinja: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.90 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rudar are significantly stronger at home: they have won all 3 home matches, scoring an average of 3.00 goals and conceding just 0.33. Dravinja have failed to win any of their 4 away fixtures, losing 75% of them and conceding an average of 2.25 goals. The hosts create more chances, averaging 16.33 shots compared with the visitors’ 10.50, while their xG stands at 1.92 versus 1.43 for the away side. In addition, Rudar have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their home matches, whereas Dravinja have failed to score in 50% of away games and have not recorded a single clean sheet. Although the visitors have won 2 of their last 5 matches overall, Rudar’s superior home performance and Dravinja’s defensive weakness point to a comfortable home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by the very weak defensive records of both teams: Rudar concede an average of 2.67 goals, while Dravinja concede 2.25 goals per match, with neither side recording a clean sheet in any match. Rudar have had BTTS in 100% of their matches this season, while across their last five appearances, the figures stand at 60% for the hosts and 80% for Dravinja. Current scoring form also points towards goals, as Rudar have averaged 3.0 goals scored and 2.2 conceded in their last five matches, while Dravinja have scored 2.0 and allowed 2.0 goals per game. However, Dravinja average only 0.5 goals scored across the entire season and have failed to score in 50% of their matches, which reduces confidence in the pick. Nevertheless, their xG of 1.43 and 4.25 shots on target per match indicate that they should create chances against Rudar’s defence. The overall signals are clearly stronger than the league BTTS average of 45%, making a scenario in which both teams score more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to at least two goals, as Rudar have gone over 1.5 goals in 100% of their matches so far, while Dravinja have done so in 75%. Neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, with Rudar conceding an average of 2.67 goals and Dravinja 2.25 per match. In their last five games, the hosts averaged 3.0 goals scored and the visitors 2.0, while over 2.5 goals landed in 80% of the matches played by each team. The xG data also points to an open game: the hosts create chances worth 1.61 xG, while the visitors average 1.43 xG, with both defenses allowing high xG values. The Over 1.5 line offers the greatest safety margin, even if the high scoring efficiency from recent matches partially declines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by a Rudar win is the most likely outcome, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 67% of their matches, while Dravinja recorded the same result in 50% of games. Rudar have not yet been ahead at the break, but they have significantly improved after the interval in their last five appearances: they averaged 2.2 goals and won the second half in 60% of cases. Dravinja have averaged only 0.25 goals after half-time in the available season data, lost 75% of second halves, and have a negative goal difference of five. The hosts are also more clinical in front of goal, converting 15% of their shots compared with 5% for the visitors, although their vulnerable defence, conceding an average of 2.67 goals per match, limits confidence in the 1/1 pick. The X/1 scenario best combines a cautious first-half outlook with Rudar's advantage in the closing stages of the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
RudarDravinja
18Shots10
RudarDravinja
10Shots on target5
RudarDravinja
2.43xG1.51
RudarDravinja
4Corners6
RudarDravinja
82Dangerous attacks72
RudarDravinja
19Fouls14
RudarDravinja
0Cards0
RudarDravinja

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.14Goals scored / match1
RudarDravinja
1.71Goals conceded / match2.43
RudarDravinja
52%Average possession44%
RudarDravinja
4.86Shots on target / match4.43
RudarDravinja

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.71Shots per match10.86
RudarDravinja
4.86Shots on target4.43
RudarDravinja
15.6%Shot conversion9.2%
RudarDravinja
52%Possession44%
RudarDravinja
1.7xG for1.52
RudarDravinja
1.66xG against1.94
RudarDravinja

Shooting quality

Rudar: Efficient finishingDravinja: Balanced
RudarDravinja
Accuracy (shots on target)35%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rudar is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Rudar · 0.8 pts / match - Dravinja

Rudar
LWLWW
Season result split
57% W0% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-3
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 at home
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Dravinja
LLDLW
Season result split
14% W14% D71% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-5
0.57 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 away
0-1-3
LLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rudar is 114% better for: goals scored per match.

2.14 goals / match - Rudar · 1 goals / match - Dravinja

Rudar is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.71 goals / match - Rudar · 2.43 goals / match - Dravinja

Rudar scoring profile: very strong

Rudar scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Dravinja keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 matches).

Dravinja scoring profile: strong

Dravinja scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

15Goals scored (season)7
RudarDravinja
12Goals conceded (season)17
RudarDravinja
3.86Average goals in match3.43
RudarDravinja
12Goals scored (last 5)6
RudarDravinja
10Goals conceded (last 5)13
RudarDravinja

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
RudarDravinja
71%2 goals14%
RudarDravinja
43%3 goals14%
RudarDravinja
29%4 goals0%
RudarDravinja

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal100%
RudarDravinja
57%2 goals57%
RudarDravinja
29%3 goals43%
RudarDravinja
14%4 goals29%
RudarDravinja

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

43%BTTS at half-time43%
RudarDravinja
29%BTTS in both halves0%
RudarDravinja
43%Scored in both halves14%
RudarDravinja

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
RudarDravinja
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RudarDravinja
60%BTTS - last 580%
RudarDravinja

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
RudarDravinja
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
RudarDravinja
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
RudarDravinja

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
RudarDravinja
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
RudarDravinja
57%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
RudarDravinja

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dravinja is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.43 pts / match - Rudar · 0.57 pts / match - Dravinja

Rudar - half-time state
0% leading43% draw57% trailing
Dravinja - half-time state
0% leading57% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.43Points per match (1st half)0.57
RudarDravinja
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.43
RudarDravinja
1Goals conceded (1st half)1
RudarDravinja
1.43Average goals (1st half)1.43
RudarDravinja
29%Clean sheet before half-time29%
RudarDravinja
57%No goal before half-time57%
RudarDravinja

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per match (2nd half)0.71
RudarDravinja
1.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
RudarDravinja
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)1.43
RudarDravinja
2.43Average goals (2nd half)2
RudarDravinja
43%Clean sheet after half-time14%
RudarDravinja
29%No goal after half-time57%
RudarDravinja

Rudar - second-half results

57% W0% D43% L
3
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.43
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dravinja - second-half results

14% W29% D57% L
4
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.57
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Rudar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.80
Goals scored / match0.61.8
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.82.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-3+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Dravinja - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.6
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-2-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
5
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Dravinja
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
3
31-45
2
3
46-60
1
5
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
126%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Dravinja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

RudarLigaDravinja
Average goals in match▲ 3.862.90▲ 3.43
Both teams scored• 43%43%▲ 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 57%56%• 57%
Clean sheets▼ 29%33%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%73%▼ 71%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%78%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.90
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+69%
Home attack advantage
+41%
Home defence advantage
+38%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Adam Vošnjak⚽ 1
—Tian Pantelić⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RudarGoalTian Pantelić
  2. RudarGoalAdam Vošnjak

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Rudar 0 - 1 - 1 Dravinja. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

NK Rudar Velenje
1 : 1
ND Dravinja Kostroj
ND Dravinja Kostroj
1 : 0
NK Rudar Velenje

FAQ

What was the result of Rudar vs Dravinja?

The 2. SNL match finished Rudar 3:1 Dravinja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rudar and Dravinja?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rudar won 0, Dravinja won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rudar vs Dravinja?

Rudar score 2.14 goals per game on average and Dravinja 1.00. The 2. SNL average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Rudar's matches and 71% of Dravinja's.

What form are Rudar and Dravinja in?

Over the last 5 games Rudar have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Dravinja 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudar vs Dravinja?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rudar vs Dravinja: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.