Croatia - Druga HNLData current as of 07 September 2026

Rudeš vs Cibalia: match statistics

Rudeš crest
Rudeš
2 : 3half-time 1:3
Cibalia crest
Cibalia

Rudeš vs Cibalia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rudeš played Cibalia in Druga HNL (Croatia). The match was played on 15 May 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Rudeš: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Cibalia: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rudeš scores 1.37 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Cibalia scores 1.47 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.27 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rudeš 40%, Cibalia 47%. Over 2.5: Rudeš 33%, Cibalia 50%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Rudeš has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.39. Rudeš: 11.0 shots per match, Cibalia: 9.5.

Match halves

Rudeš: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.53. Cibalia: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

Rudeš: 31-45+ (12 goals). Cibalia: 61-75 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Druga HNL: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rudeš, the table leader, has a clear home advantage: wins 73% of home matches, records only 7% defeats and concedes an average of 0.53 goals per game with 60% clean sheets. Cibalia, fourth in the table, performs worse away — wins 29% of matches, loses 50% and concedes an average of 1.29 goals per game with 36% clean sheets. In attack Rudeš generates 1.61 xG at home and 12.73 shots per game (4.47 on target), while Cibalia produces 1.31 xG and 9.77 shots (3.69 on target) away, indicating clearly better quality and quantity of chances for the hosts. In the last 5 matches Rudeš has 3 wins and 2 draws (2.2 pts per game), Cibalia has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 pts per game), so form is similar, but Rudeš’s home goal difference (+14) versus Cibalia’s -3 away further confirms the home advantage. Based on this, I forecast a Rudeš victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back No BTTS because Rudeš keeps a clean sheet in 53% of home matches and concedes only 0.67 goals at home on average, while Cibalia scores 1.07 goals away on average. Home BTTS rate is 40% vs 57% for the visitors, but the last 5 games for both teams show BTTS at 60% — a mixed signal, though Rudeš’s defense has the edge. xG indicates Rudeš has xG of 1.51 with Cibalia conceding xG 1.30 (around 1.4 expected goals for the home side), while Cibalia has xG 1.31 with Rudeš conceding xG 1.22 (close to 1.3 for the away side). Additionally Rudeš has higher finishing efficiency (conversion 18% vs 12%) and in the last 5 matches conceded only 3 goals (0.6 per match) versus Cibalia’s 5 conceded (1.0 per match), which emphasizes the home advantage and supports a No BTTS / No Goal scenario (clean sheet expected).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Calculated expected goals total approximately 2.68: home side Rudeš ~1.41 (home xG 1.51 vs xG conceded by Cibalia 1.30) and visitors Cibalia ~1.27 (away xG 1.31 vs xG conceded by Rudeš 1.22). Rudeš at home averages 10.33 shots per game with an 18% conversion rate (equating to ~1.87 goals at home), Cibalia average 9.77 shots with a 12% conversion (~1.17 goals), and in the last 5 matches both teams scored 9 goals each (avg 1.8). Season Over 1.5 rates are 87% for Rudeš and 57% for Cibalia; with a combined expected 2.68 goals I estimate the probability of at least 2 goals at about 75%. I assess Over 2.5 at ~50% and Over 3.5 at ~28%, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 — I recommend backing Over 1.5 due to the higher home scoring efficiency (1.87 goals at home, 18% conversion) and moderate expected contribution from Cibalia (1.27 expected goals).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is 1/1 (home team leading at Half-Time and winning at Full-Time). Rudeš led at the break in 40% of their matches and overall wins 67% of games, which suggests that a lead at the break often converts into a victory. The home side scores an average of 0.67 goals by Half-Time and concedes only 0.27, while after the break they average 1.2 goals at home, with at least one goal in 93% of their home matches in the second half, increasing their chances of maintaining or extending the lead. Cibalia are losing at the break in 43% of matches and concede an average of 0.71 goals by Half-Time, and their away wins are only 29%, so they have limited turnaround potential. Therefore the 1/1 scenario received the highest weighting (34%), while X/1 (28%) is a realistic alternative due to the high proportion of draws at Half-Time (47%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
RudešCibalia
13Shots11
RudešCibalia
8Shots on target6
RudešCibalia
1.98xG1.47
RudešCibalia
7Corners1
RudešCibalia
82Dangerous attacks48
RudešCibalia
14Fouls19
RudešCibalia
1Cards4
RudešCibalia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.37Goals scored / match1.47
RudešCibalia
0.83Goals conceded / match0.93
RudešCibalia
53%Average possession52%
RudešCibalia
4.13Shots on target / match3.73
RudešCibalia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match9.47
RudešCibalia
4.13Shots on target3.73
RudešCibalia
12.4%Shot conversion15.5%
RudešCibalia
53%Possession52%
RudešCibalia
1.45xG for1.39
RudešCibalia
1.23xG against1.23
RudešCibalia

Shooting quality

Rudeš: BalancedCibalia: Efficient finishing
RudešCibalia
Accuracy (shots on target)38%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rudeš is 10% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Rudeš · 2 pts / match - Cibalia

Rudeš
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
57% W27% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-8-5
1.97 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-3-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Cibalia
DWWLW
Season result split
50% W20% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-6-9
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-7
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cibalia is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.37 goals / match - Rudeš · 1.47 goals / match - Cibalia

Rudeš is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Rudeš · 0.93 goals / match - Cibalia

Rudeš scoring profile: strong

Rudeš scores in 87% of matches (26 of 30 matches), while Cibalia keeps a clean sheet in 47% (14 of 30 matches).

Cibalia scoring profile: strong

Cibalia scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Rudeš keeps a clean sheet in 57% (17 of 30 matches).

41Goals scored (season)44
RudešCibalia
25Goals conceded (season)28
RudešCibalia
2.2Average goals in match2.4
RudešCibalia
9Goals scored (last 5)9
RudešCibalia
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
RudešCibalia

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal83%
RudešCibalia
33%2 goals43%
RudešCibalia
13%3 goals13%
RudešCibalia
3%4 goals7%
RudešCibalia

How often they concede at least...

43%1 goal53%
RudešCibalia
17%2 goals37%
RudešCibalia
17%3 goals3%
RudešCibalia
7%4 goals0%
RudešCibalia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time17%
RudešCibalia
0%BTTS in both halves3%
RudešCibalia
13%Scored in both halves23%
RudešCibalia

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
RudešCibalia
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
RudešCibalia
60%BTTS - last 560%
RudešCibalia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
RudešCibalia
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
RudešCibalia
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
RudešCibalia

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
RudešCibalia
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
RudešCibalia
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
RudešCibalia

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rudeš is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.93 pts / match - Rudeš · 1.47 pts / match - Cibalia

Rudeš - half-time state
50% leading43% draw7% trailing
Cibalia - half-time state
37% leading37% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.93Points per match (1st half)1.47
RudešCibalia
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.6
RudešCibalia
0.23Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
RudešCibalia
1.07Average goals (1st half)1.07
RudešCibalia
83%Clean sheet before half-time63%
RudešCibalia
43%No goal before half-time50%
RudešCibalia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.67
RudešCibalia
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
RudešCibalia
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
RudešCibalia
1.13Average goals (2nd half)1.33
RudešCibalia
63%Clean sheet after half-time67%
RudešCibalia
57%No goal after half-time43%
RudešCibalia

Rudeš - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
58
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+18
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cibalia - second-half results

43% W37% R20% P
44
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rudeš - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.60
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Cibalia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.40
Goals scored / match1.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match2.00.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rudeš
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
9
2
16-30
12
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
3
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Cibalia
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
4
5
16-30
9
5
31-45
8
3
46-60
13
4
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rudeš

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Cibalia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
165%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).

Teams vs league

RudešLigaCibalia
Average goals in match 2.202.27 2.40
Both teams scored 40%43% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%41% 50%
Clean sheets 57%33% 47%
Goal before half-time 60%67% 70%
Goal after half-time 70%74% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.27
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
0.89
Away goals / match
+55%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RudešGoalMerlin HadziAssist: Duje Korač
  2. CibaliaGoalPetar Brlek
  3. CibaliaGoalDavid ŽabecAssist: Gabrijel Boban
  4. CibaliaGoalDavid BosakAssist: David Žabec
  5. CibaliaYellow cardPetar Brlek
  6. CibaliaYellow cardPetar Mišić
  7. CibaliaYellow cardMarko Pervan
  8. CibaliaYellow cardNoa Godec
  9. RudešYellow cardXavier Cabrita Fernandes

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Marko CrnojevićMatches officiated: 14
3.57Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 264%Home wins14%Draws21%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Rudeš 1 - 1 - 0 Cibalia. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

NK Rudeš
1 : 0
HNK Cibalia Vinkovci
HNK Cibalia Vinkovci
1 : 1
NK Rudeš

FAQ

What was the result of Rudeš vs Cibalia?

The Druga HNL match finished Rudeš 2:3 Cibalia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rudeš and Cibalia?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rudeš won 1, Cibalia won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rudeš vs Cibalia?

Rudeš score 1.37 goals per game on average and Cibalia 1.47. The Druga HNL average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Rudeš's matches and 47% of Cibalia's.

What form are Rudeš and Cibalia in?

Over the last 5 games Rudeš have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Cibalia 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudeš vs Cibalia?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rudeš vs Cibalia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.