Slovakia - Super LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Ružomberok vs FK Košice: match statistics

Ružomberok crest
Ružomberok
1 : 1half-time 1:0
FK Košice crest
FK Košice
130%(2.62)
X25%(3.25)
245%(2.30)

FK Košice is in excellent form, winning four of their last five matches and scoring 13 goals in this period, which translates to 2.6 PPG. Ružomberok presents poor home form with only an 18% home win rate and just one victory in their last five games. The visitors show significantly better shooting efficiency (10% shot conversion vs 7% for the hosts) and more shots on target per match (4.73 vs 3.82). Although FK Košice has a weaker away record (27% win rate), their current form and advantage in key offensive statistics give them a realistic chance of securing a victory. The difference in xG (1.53 for the visitors vs 1.45 for the hosts) and the fact that Ružomberok fails to score in 36% of their home matches further support the prediction in favor of FK Košice.

Ružomberok vs FK Košice: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ružomberok play FK Košice in Super Liga (Slovakia). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Ružomberok: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. FK Košice: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ružomberok scores 1.06 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. FK Košice scores 1.59 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ružomberok 53%, FK Košice 72%. Over 2.5: Ružomberok 50%, FK Košice 69%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

FK Košice has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.25. Ružomberok: 10.7 shots per match, FK Košice: 15.4.

Match halves

Ružomberok: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.47. FK Košice: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.72.

Goals by minute

Ružomberok: 0-15 (9 goals). FK Košice: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super Liga: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 100%.

Match description

FK Košice is in excellent form, winning four of their last five matches and scoring 13 goals in this period, which translates to 2.6 PPG. Ružomberok presents poor home form with only an 18% home win rate and just one victory in their last five games. The visitors show significantly better shooting efficiency (10% shot conversion vs 7% for the hosts) and more shots on target per match (4.73 vs 3.82). Although FK Košice has a weaker away record (27% win rate), their current form and advantage in key offensive statistics give them a realistic chance of securing a victory. The difference in xG (1.53 for the visitors vs 1.45 for the hosts) and the fact that Ružomberok fails to score in 36% of their home matches further support the prediction in favor of FK Košice.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
RužomberokFK Košice
4Shots13
RužomberokFK Košice
3Shots on target3
RužomberokFK Košice
0.87xG1.31
RužomberokFK Košice
2Corners3
RužomberokFK Košice
54Dangerous attacks39
RužomberokFK Košice
11Fouls10
RužomberokFK Košice
1Cards2
RužomberokFK Košice

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

RužomberokFK Košice
1.06Goals scored / match1.59
RužomberokFK Košice
1.56Goals conceded / match1.72
RužomberokFK Košice
44%Average possession49%
RužomberokFK Košice
3.47Shots on target / match5.44
RužomberokFK Košice

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.66Shots per match15.38
RužomberokFK Košice
3.47Shots on target5.44
RužomberokFK Košice
10%Shot conversion10.4%
RužomberokFK Košice
44%Possession49%
RužomberokFK Košice
1.25xG for1.72
RužomberokFK Košice
1.63xG against1.53
RužomberokFK Košice

Shooting quality

Ružomberok: BalancedFK Košice: Attacking
RužomberokFK Košice
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ružomberok is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Ružomberok · 1.2 pts / match - FK Košice

Ružomberok
WLDWL
Season result split
25% W34% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-13
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-8-4
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
FK Košice
LWLWL
Season result split
41% W13% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-15
1.34 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-10
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FK Košice is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.06 goals / match - Ružomberok · 1.59 goals / match - FK Košice

Ružomberok is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - Ružomberok · 1.72 goals / match - FK Košice

Ružomberok scoring profile: very strong

Ružomberok scores in 63% of matches (20 of 32 matches), while FK Košice keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 32 matches).

FK Košice scoring profile: very strong

FK Košice scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while Ružomberok keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

34Goals scored (season)51
RužomberokFK Košice
50Goals conceded (season)55
RužomberokFK Košice
2.63Average goals in match3.31
RužomberokFK Košice
8Goals scored (last 5)7
RužomberokFK Košice
9Goals conceded (last 5)10
RužomberokFK Košice

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal84%
RužomberokFK Košice
28%2 goals56%
RužomberokFK Košice
13%3 goals16%
RužomberokFK Košice
3%4 goals3%
RužomberokFK Košice

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal88%
RužomberokFK Košice
38%2 goals50%
RužomberokFK Košice
31%3 goals28%
RužomberokFK Košice
6%4 goals6%
RužomberokFK Košice

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time25%
RužomberokFK Košice
3%BTTS in both halves3%
RužomberokFK Košice
19%Scored in both halves25%
RužomberokFK Košice

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS66%
RužomberokFK Košice
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
RužomberokFK Košice
80%BTTS - last 580%
RužomberokFK Košice

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time94%
RužomberokFK Košice
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time59%
RužomberokFK Košice
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
RužomberokFK Košice

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
RužomberokFK Košice
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
RužomberokFK Košice
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
RužomberokFK Košice

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FK Košice is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Ružomberok · 1.28 pts / match - FK Košice

Ružomberok - half-time state
19% leading56% draw25% trailing
FK Košice - half-time state
38% leading16% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.28
RužomberokFK Košice
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.88
RužomberokFK Košice
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
RužomberokFK Košice
1.28Average goals (1st half)1.75
RužomberokFK Košice
47%Clean sheet before half-time38%
RužomberokFK Košice
56%No goal before half-time44%
RužomberokFK Košice

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.22
RužomberokFK Košice
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.72
RužomberokFK Košice
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.84
RužomberokFK Košice
1.34Average goals (2nd half)1.56
RužomberokFK Košice
50%Clean sheet after half-time41%
RužomberokFK Košice
63%No goal after half-time47%
RužomberokFK Košice

Ružomberok - second-half results

22% W34% R44% P
36
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FK Košice - second-half results

31% W28% R41% P
41
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding108%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ružomberok - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.21.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
FK Košice - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ružomberok
ScoredConceded
9
7
0-15
7
5
16-30
3
10
31-45
3
10
46-60
3
8
61-75
9
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

FK Košice
ScoredConceded
12
7
0-15
4
6
16-30
12
15
31-45
10
7
46-60
8
9
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ružomberok

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

FK Košice

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).

Teams vs league

RužomberokLigaFK Košice
Average goals in match 2.632.82 3.31
Both teams scored 53%53% 72%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%57% 69%
Clean sheets 22%27% 13%
Goal before half-time 69%73% 94%
Goal after half-time 72%74% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Ružomberok 0 - 1 - 2 FK Košice. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ružomberok vs FK Košice?

The Super Liga match finished Ružomberok 1:1 FK Košice. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ružomberok and FK Košice?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ružomberok won 0, FK Košice won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ružomberok vs FK Košice?

Ružomberok score 1.06 goals per game on average and FK Košice 1.59. The Super Liga average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Ružomberok's matches and 72% of FK Košice's.

What form are Ružomberok and FK Košice in?

Over the last 5 games Ružomberok have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and FK Košice 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ružomberok vs FK Košice?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.