Ružomberok vs Tatran Prešov: match statistics
Ružomberok vs Tatran Prešov: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ružomberok played Tatran Prešov in Super Liga (Slovakia). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Ružomberok: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Tatran Prešov: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ružomberok scores 1.00 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. Tatran Prešov scores 0.86 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.83 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ružomberok 52%, Tatran Prešov 48%. Over 2.5: Ružomberok 52%, Tatran Prešov 48%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Tatran Prešov has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.27. Ružomberok: 10.8 shots per match, Tatran Prešov: 12.1.
Match halves
Ružomberok: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.48. Tatran Prešov: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.41.
Goals by minute
Ružomberok: 0-15 (8 goals). Tatran Prešov: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super Liga: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ružomberok holds a small but meaningful statistical edge: at home they average 0.93 goals per match versus Tatran Prešov’s 0.64 goals away, and their home xG is 1.41 compared to the visitors’ 1.33 xG. The hosts are more clinical (conversion 8% vs 5%) and register slightly more shots on target (3.86 vs 3.5), while both teams share equal possession at 47%. Both sides struggle in the last five matches: Ružomberok scored 4 and conceded 7, Prešov have 3 goals and 5 conceded; the visitors fail to score in 57% of away games versus 36% of hosts who fail to score at home. Ružomberok sit higher in the table (7th vs 11th) and average 1 point in their last 5 matches compared to Prešov’s 0.8, but the hosts’ home games end in draws as much as 50% of the time, which increases the probability of a shared point. Considering better efficiency (xG 1.41 vs 1.33 and conversion 8% vs 5%) and a higher goal tally this season (29 vs 25), I give Ružomberok the greater chances of victory, although a draw remains a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Ružomberok has BTTS in 60% of home matches, while Tatran Prešov records BTTS in 36% of away fixtures, producing a mixed signal but a home advantage. Ružomberok scores on average 1.07 at home and concedes 1.67, whereas Prešov away scores 0.64 and concedes 1.14, meaning the hosts are more productive and the visitors struggle to score. xG values are similar (xG 1.37 vs 1.33) and xG against are 1.5 and 1.63, indicating both sides create and allow a fair number of chances. Additionally Ružomberok averages 12.4 shots with a 9% conversion (≈1.12 goals from conversion), and Prešov 11.86 with 5% (≈0.59), so despite lower finishing the visitors have underlying xG and chances — supporting a BTTS scenario (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis shows Ružomberok generates 1.37 xG per match on average, while Tatran Prešov has 1.33 xG; when matched against opponent defenses (Tatran concedes 1.63 xG, Ružomberok 1.50) we obtain expected goals of ~1.50 for the home side and ~1.42 for the visitors, totaling ~2.92 goals. Ružomberok averages 12.4 shots with a 9.0% conversion, whereas Tatran averages 11.86 shots with a 5.0% conversion, which increases the likelihood of the home side converting chances. Seasonal rates show Ružomberok has 60% of home matches Over 2.5 goals, while Tatran has 36% of away matches Over 2.5; the league average goals is 2.83 and our expectation is ~2.92, so the 2.5 line is a natural pivot. Over 1.5 looks very likely (~88%), while Over 3.5 has lower chances (~39%), therefore the best pick is Over 2.5 as a relatively high-value selection with probability ~67%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X): in the last 5 matches both teams were level at the break in 60% of cases (last 5: 60% for hosts and 60% for visitors), while seasonal full-time draw rates are 40% for the hosts and 36% for the visitors. The teams’ xG are similar: 1.37 for Ružomberok versus 1.33 for Tatran, and average goals conceded are 1.67 (hosts) vs 1.14 (guests), indicating balanced chances and only a small difference deciding the outcome. Seasonally the hosts scored on average 0.67 goals by half-time compared to 0.21 for the visitors, however in the last 5 games the hosts have fallen to 0.2 first-half goals while Tatran has 0.6 (last 5), which increases the likelihood of a level score at the break. Additionally, Ružomberok conceded 9 goals in minutes 31–45 this season, which limits their lead-at-the-break advantage despite a seasonal 27% rate of leading at half-time, therefore the X/X Half-Time/Full-Time scenario receives the highest probability (35%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ružomberok | Tatran Prešov | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ružomberok is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Ružomberok · 0.8 pts / match - Tatran Prešov
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ružomberok is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Ružomberok · 0.86 goals / match - Tatran Prešov
Tatran Prešov is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.55 goals / match - Ružomberok · 1.41 goals / match - Tatran Prešov
Ružomberok scores in 62% of matches (18 of 29 matches), while Tatran Prešov keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).
Tatran Prešov scores in 52% of matches (15 of 29 matches), while Ružomberok keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ružomberok
Over / Under - Tatran Prešov
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ružomberok is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / match - Ružomberok · 0.93 pts / match - Tatran Prešov
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ružomberok - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tatran Prešov - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ružomberok
Tatran Prešov
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).
Teams vs league
| Ružomberok | Liga | Tatran Prešov | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.55 | 2.83 | ▼ 2.28 |
| Both teams scored | • 52% | 53% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 56% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 27% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 75% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 74% | ▼ 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Ružomberok 2 - 1 - 0 Tatran Prešov. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ružomberok vs Tatran Prešov?
The Super Liga match finished Ružomberok 1:1 Tatran Prešov. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ružomberok and Tatran Prešov?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ružomberok won 2, Tatran Prešov won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ružomberok vs Tatran Prešov?
Ružomberok score 1.00 goals per game on average and Tatran Prešov 0.86. The Super Liga average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Ružomberok's matches and 48% of Tatran Prešov's.
What form are Ružomberok and Tatran Prešov in?
Over the last 5 games Ružomberok have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tatran Prešov 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ružomberok vs Tatran Prešov?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


