Ružomberok vs Trenčín: match statistics
Ružomberok vs Trenčín: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ružomberok played Trenčín in Super Liga (Slovakia). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 4:3.
Current form
Ružomberok: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Trenčín: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ružomberok scores 1.00 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Trenčín scores 0.93 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.83 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ružomberok 53%, Trenčín 40%. Over 2.5: Ružomberok 50%, Trenčín 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Trenčín has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.27. Ružomberok: 10.8 shots per match, Trenčín: 12.6.
Match halves
Ružomberok: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47. Trenčín: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
Ružomberok: 0-15 (8 goals). Trenčín: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super Liga: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw: Ružomberok have drawn 53% of their home matches while winning only 20% at home, indicating a clear point-sharing trend. The hosts defend better at home — conceding 1.07 goals per match with an xG of 1.40 versus 1.39 xG against, whereas Trenčín concede 1.67 goals away and allow 2.16 xG on average, giving Ružomberok the edge in quality of chances. Nevertheless, Trenčín are in superior form: 3 wins in their last 5 matches and 1.8 points per match in that period versus 1.2 points per match for the hosts, and goals in the last 5 are 5 for the visitors versus 4 for Ružomberok. Both teams’ attacks are inefficient — each averaging 0.93 goals per match, conversion rate around 8% and roughly 11–12 shots per match with about 3–4 on target (3.8 vs 3.07), which limits clear-cut opportunities. Considering the high home draw rate (53%), Ružomberok’s better home defense (1.07 goals conceded) and Trenčín’s superior form, I forecast a draw with probability distribution: 30% Ružomberok, 45% draw, 25% Trenčín.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are 47% for Ružomberok and 33% for Trenčín, but in the last 5 matches they were 60% and 40% — the short-term average is around 50%, while the league BTTS is 54%, providing a context favorable to both teams scoring. Ružomberok generates xG_for 1.52 with 14.0 shots and 4.27 shots on target, while Trenčín concedes xG_against 2.16 and records only 3.07 shots on target, so the hosts create a significant chance advantage and should score. Trenčín has xG_for 1.24 and averaged 1.0 goal in the last 5 matches, while Ružomberok conceded 1.0 goal on average in those 5 games and concedes 1.47 goals seasonally, indicating the visitors also have a realistic chance to score. Ružomberok kept a clean sheet in only 20% of matches and Trenčín in 40%, which from seasonal rates gives an approximate probability of both teams scoring of about 48% (0.80×0.60), but after accounting for xG advantage and recent form I raise this forecast to around 58%, therefore I pick BTTS = Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.39 goals for Ružomberok and 1.10 for Trenčín, yielding a total forecast of 2.49 goals. For the estimate I averaged attacking xG and opponents’ defensive xG: hosts have attack xG 1.52 and xG against 1.29; visitors have attack xG 1.24 while their defense concedes xG against 2.16. After adjusting with these values and the seasonal average goals scored 0.93 I arrived at 1.39 and 1.10. This translates to P(Over 1.5) ≈ 71% (seasonal over 1.5: 73% hosts, 67% guests) and P(Over 2.5) ≈ 45% (seasonal over 2.5: 60% hosts, 40% guests; league 56%). I assess probability of Over 3.5 at about 24% (seasonal over 3.5: 13% hosts, 33% guests), so the 3.5 line does not provide a strong value signal. Considering the highest probabilities and the stats (hosts average 14 shots with 4.27 on target, while the opponent concedes 2.16 xG), I recommend backing Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics strongly indicate a draw — Ružomberok drew at the break in 60% of home matches, and Trenčín in 33% of away matches, yielding an average of approximately 47% probability of a draw after 45 minutes. Over the full match the favorites are the visitors: Trenčín have a 47% win rate this season and 1.47 points per game versus Ružomberok’s 33% win rate and 1.13 points per game, and in the last 5 matches Trenčín won 60% of fixtures compared to 20% for the hosts. Goals before the break are rare — hosts average 0.27 goals by half-time, visitors 0.53 (around 0.8 combined), whereas Ružomberok scores more after the break (0.67 goals on average and 80% of matches with at least one second-half goal), which explains possible turnarounds after the 60th minute (hosts 6 goals in 61–75 min). Despite the hosts’ higher xG (1.52 vs 1.24) and second-half activity, Trenčín’s superior form and results make the most likely scenario a draw at half-time and a visitor win at full-time (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ružomberok | Trenčín | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Trenčín is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Ružomberok · 1.8 pts / match - Trenčín
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ružomberok is 8% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Ružomberok · 0.93 goals / match - Trenčín
Ružomberok scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Trenčín keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).
Trenčín scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Ružomberok keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ružomberok
Over / Under - Trenčín
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ružomberok is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Ružomberok · 1.07 pts / match - Trenčín
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ružomberok - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Trenčín - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ružomberok
Trenčín
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).
Teams vs league
| Ružomberok | Liga | Trenčín | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.53 | 2.83 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | • 53% | 54% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 26% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 74% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 74% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Ružomberok 1 - 1 - 1 Trenčín. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ružomberok vs Trenčín?
The Super Liga match finished Ružomberok 4:3 Trenčín. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ružomberok and Trenčín?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ružomberok won 1, Trenčín won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ružomberok vs Trenčín?
Ružomberok score 1.00 goals per game on average and Trenčín 0.93. The Super Liga average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Ružomberok's matches and 40% of Trenčín's.
What form are Ružomberok and Trenčín in?
Over the last 5 games Ružomberok have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Trenčín 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ružomberok vs Trenčín?
The statistical background for Ružomberok vs Trenčín — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


