Belgium - First Division BData current as of 22 July 2026

RWDM vs AS Eupen: match statistics

RWDM crest
RWDM
2 : 2half-time 0:0
AS Eupen crest
AS Eupen
135%(2.45)
X35%(3.10)
230%(2.63)

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, which suggests a draw. RWDM shows poor home form with just 23% of wins at home and a goal difference of -4, but their last five overall matches show improvement (1.6 points per match). AS Eupen has a better away record (33% wins, goal difference 0) and an impressive 33% clean sheets away, but their recent form is concerning (only 1 point per match in the last 5 matches). Both teams have identical shot conversion (14%) and similar average xG, confirming the balance of power. Considering both teams' high draw percentages (23% for RWDM at home, 25% for Eupen away) and the visitors' decline in form, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.

RWDM vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RWDM play AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 1 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

RWDM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. AS Eupen: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

RWDM scores 1.56 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. AS Eupen scores 1.38 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RWDM 63%, AS Eupen 53%. Over 2.5: RWDM 59%, AS Eupen 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

RWDM has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.21. RWDM: 11.5 shots per match, AS Eupen: 10.5.

Match halves

RWDM: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.84. AS Eupen: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.66.

Goals by minute

RWDM: 76-90+ (13 goals). AS Eupen: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, which suggests a draw. RWDM shows poor home form with just 23% of wins at home and a goal difference of -4, but their last five overall matches show improvement (1.6 points per match). AS Eupen has a better away record (33% wins, goal difference 0) and an impressive 33% clean sheets away, but their recent form is concerning (only 1 point per match in the last 5 matches). Both teams have identical shot conversion (14%) and similar average xG, confirming the balance of power. Considering both teams' high draw percentages (23% for RWDM at home, 25% for Eupen away) and the visitors' decline in form, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
RWDMAS Eupen
13Shots12
RWDMAS Eupen
9Shots on target2
RWDMAS Eupen
1.71xG1.17
RWDMAS Eupen
2Corners3
RWDMAS Eupen
36Dangerous attacks38
RWDMAS Eupen
14Fouls11
RWDMAS Eupen
2Cards1
RWDMAS Eupen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.56Goals scored / match1.38
RWDMAS Eupen
1.69Goals conceded / match1.13
RWDMAS Eupen
48%Average possession52%
RWDMAS Eupen
4.38Shots on target / match3.81
RWDMAS Eupen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match10.5
RWDMAS Eupen
4.38Shots on target3.81
RWDMAS Eupen
13.6%Shot conversion13.1%
RWDMAS Eupen
48%Possession52%
RWDMAS Eupen
1.33xG for1.21
RWDMAS Eupen
1.54xG against1.61
RWDMAS Eupen

Shooting quality

RWDM: Efficient finishingAS Eupen: Efficient finishing
RWDMAS Eupen
Accuracy (shots on target)38%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AS Eupen is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - RWDM · 1.6 pts / match - AS Eupen

RWDM
LDLWL
Season result split
28% W28% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-7
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
AS Eupen
WDWDL
Season result split
38% W34% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-11-9
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RWDM is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - RWDM · 1.38 goals / match - AS Eupen

AS Eupen is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.69 goals / match - RWDM · 1.13 goals / match - AS Eupen

RWDM scoring profile: strong

RWDM scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

AS Eupen scoring profile: very strong

AS Eupen scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

50Goals scored (season)44
RWDMAS Eupen
54Goals conceded (season)36
RWDMAS Eupen
3.25Average goals in match2.5
RWDMAS Eupen
8Goals scored (last 5)6
RWDMAS Eupen
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
RWDMAS Eupen

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal84%
RWDMAS Eupen
50%2 goals38%
RWDMAS Eupen
19%3 goals13%
RWDMAS Eupen
3%4 goals3%
RWDMAS Eupen

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal63%
RWDMAS Eupen
53%2 goals38%
RWDMAS Eupen
31%3 goals13%
RWDMAS Eupen
6%4 goals0%
RWDMAS Eupen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time16%
RWDMAS Eupen
13%BTTS in both halves6%
RWDMAS Eupen
34%Scored in both halves16%
RWDMAS Eupen

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
RWDMAS Eupen
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
RWDMAS Eupen
100%BTTS - last 540%
RWDMAS Eupen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
RWDMAS Eupen
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
RWDMAS Eupen
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
RWDMAS Eupen

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
RWDMAS Eupen
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
RWDMAS Eupen
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
RWDMAS Eupen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AS Eupen is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - RWDM · 1.5 pts / match - AS Eupen

RWDM - half-time state
34% leading38% draw28% trailing
AS Eupen - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.5
RWDMAS Eupen
0.72Goals scored (1st half)0.72
RWDMAS Eupen
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
RWDMAS Eupen
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.25
RWDMAS Eupen
63%Clean sheet before half-time59%
RWDMAS Eupen
41%No goal before half-time50%
RWDMAS Eupen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per match (2nd half)1.44
RWDMAS Eupen
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)0.66
RWDMAS Eupen
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
RWDMAS Eupen
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.25
RWDMAS Eupen
38%Clean sheet after half-time59%
RWDMAS Eupen
44%No goal after half-time50%
RWDMAS Eupen

RWDM - second-half results

28% W31% R41% P
45
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AS Eupen - second-half results

34% W41% R25% P
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
AS Eupen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
9
7
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
9
46-60
6
7
61-75
13
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
9
9
16-30
11
6
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
8
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RWDMLigaAS Eupen
Average goals in match 3.252.84 2.50
Both teams scored 63%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%54% 47%
Clean sheets 22%26% 38%
Goal before half-time 72%71% 75%
Goal after half-time 88%79% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RWDM 0 - 1 - 0 AS Eupen. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KAS Eupen
2 : 2
Racing White Daring Molenbeek 47

FAQ

What was the result of RWDM vs AS Eupen?

The First Division B match finished RWDM 2:2 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs AS Eupen?

RWDM score 1.56 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 1.38. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 63% of RWDM's matches and 53% of AS Eupen's.

What form are RWDM and AS Eupen in?

Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and AS Eupen 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs AS Eupen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RWDM vs AS Eupen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.