Belgium - First Division BData current as of 06 September 2026

RWDM vs AS Eupen: match statistics

RWDM crest
RWDM
2 : 2half-time 0:0
AS Eupen crest
AS Eupen
135%(2.45)
X35%(3.10)
230%(2.63)

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, which suggests a draw. RWDM shows poor home form with just 23% of wins at home and a goal difference of -4, but their last five overall matches show improvement (1.6 points per match). AS Eupen has a better away record (33% wins, goal difference 0) and an impressive 33% clean sheets away, but their recent form is concerning (only 1 point per match in the last 5 matches). Both teams have identical shot conversion (14%) and similar average xG, confirming the balance of power. Considering both teams' high draw percentages (23% for RWDM at home, 25% for Eupen away) and the visitors' decline in form, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.

RWDM vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RWDM played AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 1 March 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

RWDM: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. AS Eupen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

RWDM scores 1.52 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. AS Eupen scores 1.33 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RWDM 56%, AS Eupen 58%. Over 2.5: RWDM 56%, AS Eupen 46%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

RWDM has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.16. RWDM: 12.1 shots per match, AS Eupen: 9.9.

Match halves

RWDM: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.80. AS Eupen: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

RWDM: 76-90+ (9 goals). AS Eupen: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, which suggests a draw. RWDM shows poor home form with just 23% of wins at home and a goal difference of -4, but their last five overall matches show improvement (1.6 points per match). AS Eupen has a better away record (33% wins, goal difference 0) and an impressive 33% clean sheets away, but their recent form is concerning (only 1 point per match in the last 5 matches). Both teams have identical shot conversion (14%) and similar average xG, confirming the balance of power. Considering both teams' high draw percentages (23% for RWDM at home, 25% for Eupen away) and the visitors' decline in form, the most likely scenario is a share of the points.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
RWDMAS Eupen
13Shots12
RWDMAS Eupen
9Shots on target2
RWDMAS Eupen
1.71xG1.17
RWDMAS Eupen
2Corners3
RWDMAS Eupen
36Dangerous attacks38
RWDMAS Eupen
14Fouls11
RWDMAS Eupen
2Cards1
RWDMAS Eupen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.52Goals scored / match1.33
RWDMAS Eupen
1.64Goals conceded / match1.17
RWDMAS Eupen
50%Average possession53%
RWDMAS Eupen
4.16Shots on target / match3.67
RWDMAS Eupen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.08Shots per match9.92
RWDMAS Eupen
4.16Shots on target3.67
RWDMAS Eupen
12.6%Shot conversion13.4%
RWDMAS Eupen
50%Possession53%
RWDMAS Eupen
1.36xG for1.16
RWDMAS Eupen
1.56xG against1.65
RWDMAS Eupen

Shooting quality

RWDM: BalancedAS Eupen: Efficient finishing
RWDMAS Eupen
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

RWDM is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - RWDM · 1 pts / match - AS Eupen

RWDM
WWDLD
Season result split
28% W28% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-11
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
AS Eupen
LDLWD
Season result split
38% W33% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-7
1.46 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RWDM is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.52 goals / match - RWDM · 1.33 goals / match - AS Eupen

AS Eupen is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.64 goals / match - RWDM · 1.17 goals / match - AS Eupen

RWDM scoring profile: strong

RWDM scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).

AS Eupen scoring profile: very strong

AS Eupen scores in 88% of matches (21 of 24 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

38Goals scored (season)32
RWDMAS Eupen
41Goals conceded (season)28
RWDMAS Eupen
3.16Average goals in match2.5
RWDMAS Eupen
5Goals scored (last 5)5
RWDMAS Eupen
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
RWDMAS Eupen

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal88%
RWDMAS Eupen
44%2 goals38%
RWDMAS Eupen
24%3 goals8%
RWDMAS Eupen
4%4 goals0%
RWDMAS Eupen

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal67%
RWDMAS Eupen
52%2 goals38%
RWDMAS Eupen
28%3 goals13%
RWDMAS Eupen
8%4 goals0%
RWDMAS Eupen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time13%
RWDMAS Eupen
16%BTTS in both halves4%
RWDMAS Eupen
32%Scored in both halves13%
RWDMAS Eupen

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
RWDMAS Eupen
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
RWDMAS Eupen
40%BTTS - last 560%
RWDMAS Eupen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
RWDMAS Eupen
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
RWDMAS Eupen
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
RWDMAS Eupen

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
RWDMAS Eupen
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
RWDMAS Eupen
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
RWDMAS Eupen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RWDM - half-time state
32% leading40% draw28% trailing
AS Eupen - half-time state
33% leading38% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.38
RWDMAS Eupen
0.72Goals scored (1st half)0.67
RWDMAS Eupen
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
RWDMAS Eupen
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.25
RWDMAS Eupen
60%Clean sheet before half-time58%
RWDMAS Eupen
44%No goal before half-time54%
RWDMAS Eupen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per match (2nd half)1.58
RWDMAS Eupen
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
RWDMAS Eupen
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
RWDMAS Eupen
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.25
RWDMAS Eupen
40%Clean sheet after half-time58%
RWDMAS Eupen
48%No goal after half-time46%
RWDMAS Eupen

RWDM - second-half results

28% W32% R40% P
34
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AS Eupen - second-half results

42% W33% R25% P
33
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
AS Eupen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.80
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+3-5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
6
31-45
6
9
46-60
5
4
61-75
9
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
6
7
16-30
8
6
31-45
7
2
46-60
6
6
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RWDMLigaAS Eupen
Average goals in match 3.162.78 2.50
Both teams scored 56%54% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%51% 46%
Clean sheets 24%26% 33%
Goal before half-time 72%72% 75%
Goal after half-time 84%78% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.78
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AS EupenSubstitutionOn: Yentl Van GenechtenOff: Scott Fitzgerald Kennedy
  2. AS EupenSubstitutionOn: Logan Delaurier-ChaubetOff: Bertan Çalışkan
  3. RWDMYellow cardBill Lathouwers
  4. AS EupenYellow cardKevin Möhwald
  5. RWDMYellow cardMats Lemmens
  6. RWDMSubstitutionOn: Jacob MontesOff: Ilyes Ziani
  7. AS EupenSubstitutionOn: Zakaria AtteriOff: João Diogo Alves Rodrigues
  8. RWDMGoalKwasi Poku

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RWDM 0 - 1 - 0 AS Eupen. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KAS Eupen
2 : 2
Racing White Daring Molenbeek 47

FAQ

What was the result of RWDM vs AS Eupen?

The First Division B match finished RWDM 2:2 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs AS Eupen?

RWDM score 1.52 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 1.33. The First Division B average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 56% of RWDM's matches and 58% of AS Eupen's.

What form are RWDM and AS Eupen in?

Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and AS Eupen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs AS Eupen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RWDM vs AS Eupen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.