Belgium - First Division BData current as of 07 September 2026

RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen: match statistics

RWDM crest
RWDM
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Lierse Kempenzonen crest
Lierse Kempenzonen
135%(1.83)
X35%(3.60)
230%(3.50)

Statistical analysis points to an evenly matched contest between teams of similar potential. RWDM displays poor home form with just a 21% win rate on their own ground and a goal difference of -4, conceding an average of 1.93 goals per match. Lierse Kempenzonen also holds an identical goal difference of -4 in away matches but shows better form in their last five fixtures (1.8 PPG vs 1.0 PPG for the hosts). The visitors score an average of 1 goal per away game with a 29% clean sheet rate, suggesting solid defensive organization. Considering RWDM's high draw percentage at home (29%) and the even quality of both teams according to xG metrics, the most probable scenario is a share of the points. The visitors' recent form (3 wins in 5 matches) holds a slight edge over the hosts, but the home advantage could offset this difference.

RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RWDM played Lierse Kempenzonen in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 21 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

RWDM: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Lierse Kempenzonen: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

RWDM scores 1.57 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. Lierse Kempenzonen scores 1.14 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RWDM 57%, Lierse Kempenzonen 50%. Over 2.5: RWDM 57%, Lierse Kempenzonen 46%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Lierse Kempenzonen has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.34. RWDM: 11.8 shots per match, Lierse Kempenzonen: 11.9.

Match halves

RWDM: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.86. Lierse Kempenzonen: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

RWDM: 76-90+ (11 goals). Lierse Kempenzonen: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to an evenly matched contest between teams of similar potential. RWDM displays poor home form with just a 21% win rate on their own ground and a goal difference of -4, conceding an average of 1.93 goals per match. Lierse Kempenzonen also holds an identical goal difference of -4 in away matches but shows better form in their last five fixtures (1.8 PPG vs 1.0 PPG for the hosts). The visitors score an average of 1 goal per away game with a 29% clean sheet rate, suggesting solid defensive organization. Considering RWDM's high draw percentage at home (29%) and the even quality of both teams according to xG metrics, the most probable scenario is a share of the points. The visitors' recent form (3 wins in 5 matches) holds a slight edge over the hosts, but the home advantage could offset this difference.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
15Shots9
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
6Shots on target4
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.67xG1.17
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
2Corners8
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
41Dangerous attacks44
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
11Fouls15
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
4Cards1
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.57Goals scored / match1.14
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.64Goals conceded / match1.36
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
49%Average possession47%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
4.39Shots on target / match3.79
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.75Shots per match11.93
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
4.39Shots on target3.79
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
13.4%Shot conversion9.6%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
49%Possession47%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.34xG for1.39
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.52xG against1.71
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

Shooting quality

RWDM: Efficient finishingLierse Kempenzonen: Balanced
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lierse Kempenzonen is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - RWDM · 1.8 pts / match - Lierse Kempenzonen

RWDM
LDDWL
Season result split
29% W29% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-8-12
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Lierse Kempenzonen
LWWWL
Season result split
32% W21% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-13
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 2.29BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RWDM is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

1.57 goals / match - RWDM · 1.14 goals / match - Lierse Kempenzonen

Lierse Kempenzonen is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.64 goals / match - RWDM · 1.36 goals / match - Lierse Kempenzonen

RWDM scoring profile: very strong

RWDM scores in 79% of matches (22 of 28 matches), while Lierse Kempenzonen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).

Lierse Kempenzonen scoring profile: strong

Lierse Kempenzonen scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 matches).

44Goals scored (season)32
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
46Goals conceded (season)38
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
3.21Average goals in match2.5
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
8Goals scored (last 5)8
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal68%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
50%2 goals29%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
21%3 goals14%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
4%4 goals4%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal71%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
54%2 goals46%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
29%3 goals11%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
7%4 goals7%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Lierse Kempenzonen - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 28 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time18%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
14%BTTS in both halves11%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
36%Scored in both halves21%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
80%BTTS - last 580%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lierse Kempenzonen is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - RWDM · 1.54 pts / match - Lierse Kempenzonen

RWDM - half-time state
32% leading39% draw29% trailing
Lierse Kempenzonen - half-time state
39% leading36% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.54
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.71
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.39Average goals (1st half)1.25
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
61%Clean sheet before half-time61%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
43%No goal before half-time46%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)0.82
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
0.96Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
1.82Average goals (2nd half)1.25
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
43%Clean sheet after half-time39%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen
43%No goal after half-time64%
RWDMLierse Kempenzonen

RWDM - second-half results

32% W32% R36% P
38
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lierse Kempenzonen - second-half results

11% W50% R39% P
43
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 32%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.20
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Lierse Kempenzonen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.600.60
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+4-4
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
7
6
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
9
46-60
5
4
61-75
11
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Lierse Kempenzonen
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
6
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
7
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Lierse Kempenzonen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RWDMLigaLierse Kempenzonen
Average goals in match 3.212.80 2.50
Both teams scored 57%54% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%53% 46%
Clean sheets 25%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 71%71% 75%
Goal after half-time 86%78% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardAlexandre Stanic
  2. RWDMYellow cardTibo Persyn
  3. RWDMYellow cardAïman Maurer
  4. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Toni Lun BončinaOff: Daan De Peuter
  5. RWDMSubstitutionOn: Ilyes ZianiOff: Jacob Montes
  6. RWDMSubstitutionOn: Noah DodeigneOff: Aïman Maurer
  7. Lierse KempenzonenGoalCedric Jan Van Meirvenne
  8. RWDMSubstitutionOn: Kwasi PokuOff: Oskar Szulc
  9. RWDMYellow cardIlyes Ziani

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RWDM 0 - 0 - 1 Lierse Kempenzonen. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

KSK Lierse Kempenzonen
2 : 0
Racing White Daring Molenbeek 47

FAQ

What was the result of RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen?

The First Division B match finished RWDM 1:1 Lierse Kempenzonen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen?

RWDM score 1.57 goals per game on average and Lierse Kempenzonen 1.14. The First Division B average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 57% of RWDM's matches and 50% of Lierse Kempenzonen's.

What form are RWDM and Lierse Kempenzonen in?

Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Lierse Kempenzonen 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RWDM vs Lierse Kempenzonen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.