Belgium - First Division BData current as of 06 September 2026

RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse: match statistics

RWDM crest
RWDM
1 : 2half-time 1:2
Lokeren-Temse crest
Lokeren-Temse
135%(2.40)
X35%(3.25)
230%(2.50)

Statistical analysis indicates very balanced odds for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. RWDM displays poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a -3 goal difference, conceding an average of 1.92 goals per match. Lokeren-Temse shows a more solid performance away from home with a 42% win rate and a balanced goal difference (0). The recent form of both teams is similar (RWDM: 1.4 PPG, Lokeren-Temse: 1.2 PPG), and the xG statistics are almost identical, further confirming the balanced nature of this fixture. Lokeren-Temse's high draw percentage away from home (17%) combined with RWDM's struggles to secure points at home make a share of the points seem the most logical scenario.

RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RWDM played Lokeren-Temse in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 14 February 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

RWDM: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Lokeren-Temse: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

RWDM scores 1.57 and concedes 1.65 goals per match. Lokeren-Temse scores 1.35 and concedes 1.35. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RWDM 52%, Lokeren-Temse 70%. Over 2.5: RWDM 57%, Lokeren-Temse 48%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Lokeren-Temse has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.39. RWDM: 12.3 shots per match, Lokeren-Temse: 12.3.

Match halves

RWDM: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.83. Lokeren-Temse: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

RWDM: 76-90+ (8 goals). Lokeren-Temse: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates very balanced odds for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. RWDM displays poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a -3 goal difference, conceding an average of 1.92 goals per match. Lokeren-Temse shows a more solid performance away from home with a 42% win rate and a balanced goal difference (0). The recent form of both teams is similar (RWDM: 1.4 PPG, Lokeren-Temse: 1.2 PPG), and the xG statistics are almost identical, further confirming the balanced nature of this fixture. Lokeren-Temse's high draw percentage away from home (17%) combined with RWDM's struggles to secure points at home make a share of the points seem the most logical scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
RWDMLokeren-Temse
9Shots10
RWDMLokeren-Temse
3Shots on target3
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.2xG1.12
RWDMLokeren-Temse
5Corners3
RWDMLokeren-Temse
57Dangerous attacks38
RWDMLokeren-Temse
19Fouls11
RWDMLokeren-Temse
4Cards2
RWDMLokeren-Temse

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.57Goals scored / match1.35
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.65Goals conceded / match1.35
RWDMLokeren-Temse
51%Average possession53%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
4.35Shots on target / match4.26
RWDMLokeren-Temse

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.3Shots per match12.26
RWDMLokeren-Temse
4.35Shots on target4.26
RWDMLokeren-Temse
12.7%Shot conversion11%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
51%Possession53%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.39xG for1.45
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.58xG against1.5
RWDMLokeren-Temse

Shooting quality

RWDM: BalancedLokeren-Temse: Balanced
RWDMLokeren-Temse
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

RWDM is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - RWDM · 1.2 pts / match - Lokeren-Temse

RWDM
LLWWD
Season result split
30% W26% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-10
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Lokeren-Temse
WDDLD
Season result split
30% W39% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-7
1.30 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RWDM is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.57 goals / match - RWDM · 1.35 goals / match - Lokeren-Temse

Lokeren-Temse is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.65 goals / match - RWDM · 1.35 goals / match - Lokeren-Temse

RWDM scoring profile: very strong

RWDM scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Lokeren-Temse keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

Lokeren-Temse scoring profile: very strong

Lokeren-Temse scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

36Goals scored (season)31
RWDMLokeren-Temse
38Goals conceded (season)31
RWDMLokeren-Temse
3.22Average goals in match2.7
RWDMLokeren-Temse
6Goals scored (last 5)6
RWDMLokeren-Temse
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
RWDMLokeren-Temse

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal83%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
48%2 goals39%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
26%3 goals13%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
4%4 goals0%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal83%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
52%2 goals35%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
30%3 goals17%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
9%4 goals0%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time22%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
17%BTTS in both halves9%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
35%Scored in both halves22%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
40%BTTS - last 580%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RWDM is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.48 pts / match - RWDM · 1.04 pts / match - Lokeren-Temse

RWDM - half-time state
35% leading43% draw22% trailing
Lokeren-Temse - half-time state
22% leading39% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per match (1st half)1.04
RWDMLokeren-Temse
0.74Goals scored (1st half)0.52
RWDMLokeren-Temse
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.7
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.22
RWDMLokeren-Temse
65%Clean sheet before half-time39%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
43%No goal before half-time61%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)1.48
RWDMLokeren-Temse
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.91Average goals (2nd half)1.48
RWDMLokeren-Temse
35%Clean sheet after half-time48%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
48%No goal after half-time35%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

RWDM - second-half results

26% W30% R43% P
34
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lokeren-Temse - second-half results

35% W43% R22% P
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Lokeren-Temse - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
6
31-45
6
9
46-60
5
4
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Lokeren-Temse
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
2
5
16-30
6
5
31-45
3
3
46-60
8
3
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Lokeren-Temse

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RWDMLigaLokeren-Temse
Average goals in match 3.222.73 2.70
Both teams scored 52%53% 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%50% 48%
Clean sheets 26%27% 17%
Goal before half-time 70%71% 78%
Goal after half-time 87%77% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Lokeren-TemseGoalVancy Roméo MabanzaAssist: Toon Janssen
  2. RWDMSubstitutionOn: Yacine ChaibOff: Noah Dodeigne
  3. RWDMYellow cardYacine Chaib
  4. Lokeren-TemseYellow cardDiego Cámara Calleja
  5. RWDMYellow cardAïman Maurer
  6. Lokeren-TemseSubstitutionOn: Iñaki Elejalde RodríguezOff: Sam Van Aerschot
  7. Lokeren-TemseSubstitutionOn: Tom BoereOff: Vancy Roméo Mabanza
  8. Lokeren-TemseYellow cardToon Janssen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RWDM 1 - 0 - 0 Lokeren-Temse. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KSC Lokeren-Temse
1 : 3
Racing White Daring Molenbeek 47

FAQ

What was the result of RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse?

The First Division B match finished RWDM 1:2 Lokeren-Temse. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse?

RWDM score 1.57 goals per game on average and Lokeren-Temse 1.35. The First Division B average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 52% of RWDM's matches and 70% of Lokeren-Temse's.

What form are RWDM and Lokeren-Temse in?

Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Lokeren-Temse 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse?

The statistical background for RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.