Belgium - First Division BData current as of 23 July 2026

RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse: match statistics

RWDM crest
RWDM
1 : 2half-time 1:2
Lokeren-Temse crest
Lokeren-Temse
135%(2.40)
X35%(3.25)
230%(2.50)

Statistical analysis indicates very balanced odds for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. RWDM displays poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a -3 goal difference, conceding an average of 1.92 goals per match. Lokeren-Temse shows a more solid performance away from home with a 42% win rate and a balanced goal difference (0). The recent form of both teams is similar (RWDM: 1.4 PPG, Lokeren-Temse: 1.2 PPG), and the xG statistics are almost identical, further confirming the balanced nature of this fixture. Lokeren-Temse's high draw percentage away from home (17%) combined with RWDM's struggles to secure points at home make a share of the points seem the most logical scenario.

RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RWDM play Lokeren-Temse in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 14 February 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

RWDM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Lokeren-Temse: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

RWDM scores 1.56 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. Lokeren-Temse scores 1.50 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RWDM 63%, Lokeren-Temse 75%. Over 2.5: RWDM 59%, Lokeren-Temse 53%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Lokeren-Temse has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.33. RWDM: 11.5 shots per match, Lokeren-Temse: 13.0.

Match halves

RWDM: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.84. Lokeren-Temse: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.91.

Goals by minute

RWDM: 76-90+ (13 goals). Lokeren-Temse: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates very balanced odds for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. RWDM displays poor home form with just a 25% win rate at home and a -3 goal difference, conceding an average of 1.92 goals per match. Lokeren-Temse shows a more solid performance away from home with a 42% win rate and a balanced goal difference (0). The recent form of both teams is similar (RWDM: 1.4 PPG, Lokeren-Temse: 1.2 PPG), and the xG statistics are almost identical, further confirming the balanced nature of this fixture. Lokeren-Temse's high draw percentage away from home (17%) combined with RWDM's struggles to secure points at home make a share of the points seem the most logical scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
RWDMLokeren-Temse
9Shots10
RWDMLokeren-Temse
3Shots on target3
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.2xG1.12
RWDMLokeren-Temse
5Corners3
RWDMLokeren-Temse
57Dangerous attacks38
RWDMLokeren-Temse
19Fouls11
RWDMLokeren-Temse
4Cards2
RWDMLokeren-Temse

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.56Goals scored / match1.5
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.69Goals conceded / match1.41
RWDMLokeren-Temse
48%Average possession53%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
4.38Shots on target / match4.28
RWDMLokeren-Temse

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match12.97
RWDMLokeren-Temse
4.38Shots on target4.28
RWDMLokeren-Temse
13.6%Shot conversion11.6%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
48%Possession53%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.33xG for1.5
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.54xG against1.47
RWDMLokeren-Temse

Shooting quality

RWDM: Efficient finishingLokeren-Temse: Balanced
RWDMLokeren-Temse
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lokeren-Temse is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - RWDM · 1.8 pts / match - Lokeren-Temse

RWDM
LDLWL
Season result split
28% W28% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-7
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Lokeren-Temse
WWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
31% W38% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-12-10
1.31 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lokeren-Temse is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.69 goals / match - RWDM · 1.41 goals / match - Lokeren-Temse

RWDM scoring profile: very strong

RWDM scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Lokeren-Temse keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 32 matches).

Lokeren-Temse scoring profile: very strong

Lokeren-Temse scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

50Goals scored (season)48
RWDMLokeren-Temse
54Goals conceded (season)45
RWDMLokeren-Temse
3.25Average goals in match2.91
RWDMLokeren-Temse
8Goals scored (last 5)12
RWDMLokeren-Temse
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
RWDMLokeren-Temse

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal84%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
50%2 goals44%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
19%3 goals16%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
3%4 goals6%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal88%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
53%2 goals38%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
31%3 goals16%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
6%4 goals0%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
13%BTTS in both halves13%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
34%Scored in both halves25%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
100%BTTS - last 5100%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RWDM is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - RWDM · 1.09 pts / match - Lokeren-Temse

RWDM - half-time state
34% leading38% draw28% trailing
Lokeren-Temse - half-time state
22% leading44% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.09
RWDMLokeren-Temse
0.72Goals scored (1st half)0.59
RWDMLokeren-Temse
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.25
RWDMLokeren-Temse
63%Clean sheet before half-time41%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
41%No goal before half-time59%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per match (2nd half)1.38
RWDMLokeren-Temse
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
RWDMLokeren-Temse
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.66
RWDMLokeren-Temse
38%Clean sheet after half-time38%
RWDMLokeren-Temse
44%No goal after half-time31%
RWDMLokeren-Temse

RWDM - second-half results

28% W31% R41% P
45
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lokeren-Temse - second-half results

28% W53% R19% P
35
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Lokeren-Temse - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
9
7
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
9
46-60
6
7
61-75
13
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Lokeren-Temse
ScoredConceded
9
7
0-15
2
7
16-30
8
7
31-45
6
9
46-60
10
4
61-75
13
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Lokeren-Temse

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RWDMLigaLokeren-Temse
Average goals in match 3.252.84 2.91
Both teams scored 63%55% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%54% 53%
Clean sheets 22%26% 13%
Goal before half-time 72%71% 75%
Goal after half-time 88%79% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RWDM 1 - 0 - 0 Lokeren-Temse. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KSC Lokeren-Temse
1 : 3
Racing White Daring Molenbeek 47

FAQ

What was the result of RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse?

The First Division B match finished RWDM 1:2 Lokeren-Temse. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse?

RWDM score 1.56 goals per game on average and Lokeren-Temse 1.50. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 63% of RWDM's matches and 75% of Lokeren-Temse's.

What form are RWDM and Lokeren-Temse in?

Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Lokeren-Temse 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse?

The statistical background for RWDM vs Lokeren-Temse — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.