Saarbrucken vs Hansa Rostock: match statistics
Saarbrucken vs Hansa Rostock: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Saarbrucken played Hansa Rostock in 3. Liga (Germany). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 3:4.
Current form
Saarbrucken: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Hansa Rostock: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Saarbrucken scores 1.30 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Hansa Rostock scores 1.89 and concedes 1.24. League average: 3.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Saarbrucken 62%, Hansa Rostock 57%. Over 2.5: Saarbrucken 43%, Hansa Rostock 62%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.
xG, shots and style
Hansa Rostock has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.60. Saarbrucken: 13.4 shots per match, Hansa Rostock: 14.4.
Match halves
Saarbrucken: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.65. Hansa Rostock: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.97.
Goals by minute
Saarbrucken: 76-90+ (10 goals). Hansa Rostock: 31-45+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3. Liga: 3.17 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite appears to be Hansa Rostock — they sit 5th in the table versus Saarbrücken's 15th and have 17 wins this season compared to the hosts' 10. The visitors have scored 70 goals this season versus the hosts' 48, and in the last 5 matches they have netted 13 goals (2.6 per game) while conceding 10, whereas Saarbrücken scored 6 goals (1.2 per game) and conceded 6. Rostock’s away defensive record also favors them — on average 0.78 goals conceded away and 50% clean sheets away, compared to 1.00 goals conceded and 33% clean sheets for Saarbrücken at home. Saarbrücken have a higher expected xG at home (1.75 vs Hansa’s 1.53 away) and more shots on target (5.28 vs 4.78), but their conversion rate is 10% versus 13% for Rostock, meaning the visitors convert chances more efficiently. Considering the better table position, higher goal tally (70 vs 48) and away defensive stability, I tip Hansa to win; probabilities: home 20%, draw 25%, away 55%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Saarbrucken has a season BTTS rate of 74% and averages 2.16 goals scored and 1.68 conceded per match, while Hansa Rostock has a season BTTS of 39% and averages 1.61 scored and 0.78 conceded. xG analysis shows Saarbrucken’s attack generates 1.93 xG versus 1.35 xG allowed by Hansa (implying ~1.6 expected goals for the home side), and Hansa’s attack posts 1.53 xG against Saarbrucken’s defense at 1.40 (≈1.47 expected goals) — both values >1.4 and support goal-scoring from both teams. In the last 5 matches Hansa has an 80% BTTS rate, scoring 2.6 and conceding 2.0 on average, whereas Saarbrucken’s last 5 show a 40% BTTS with 1.2 scored and 1.2 conceded. The conflicting signal is Hansa’s 50% clean sheets on the road (which reduces BTTS probability), but Saarbrucken’s matches are over 2.5 goals in 74% of cases and the combination of over 2.5 goals and BTTS for the home side is 63%, while the league-wide BTTS is 64%. Considering the home-side seasonal 74% BTTS, the league 64%, both teams’ xG >1.4 and Hansa’s recent 80% BTTS, I assess BTTS - Yes as the stronger signal and assign it 62% (vs 38% for No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model (opponent attack and defense averages) yields expected goals of 1.64 for Saarbrucken (xG attack 1.93 vs opponent defense Hansa 1.35) and 1.47 for Hansa Rostock (xG attack 1.53 vs opponent defense Saarbrucken 1.40), totalling 3.11 goals. With a mean of 3.11 the Poisson distribution suggests roughly an 82% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and about 60% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5), which aligns with the hosts’ seasonal rates: 89% of Saarbrucken matches had >1.5 goals and 74% had >2.5. Counter signals are Hansa’s away defense (50% clean sheets and on average 0.78 goals conceded away) and lower BTTS for the visitors (39%), which reduce the likelihood of a very high-scoring game. Considering the home shot advantage (avg. 6.05 shots on target vs 4.78 for the visitors) and 3.11 expected goals, I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal; the 2.5 line has moderate appeal (~60%), while Over 3.5 is riskier (~38%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics indicate an advantage for Hansa Rostock: the visitors led at the break in 44% of their away matches, while Saarbrücken led at home in 32% of games; averaging these values I estimate roughly a 22% chance the hosts will lead at the break, ~43% for a draw, and ~35% for the visitors leading at the break. For the full-time result the data are balanced, but Hansa has a solid away defense — they concede on average 0.78 goals and keep a clean sheet in 50% of away games, and away losses account for only 11% of their results, which increases the probability of them maintaining a lead. Saarbrücken, however, press strongly after the break: they score on average 1.16 goals in second halves at home and have scored 12 goals in minutes 76–90, so there is a real risk of a turnaround. Overall the strongest signal from the data is the scenario of the visitors leading at half-time and Hansa winning after 90 minutes (HT/FT 2/2), which I assess at around 24%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Saarbrucken | Hansa Rostock | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hansa Rostock is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Saarbrucken · 1.6 pts / match - Hansa Rostock
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hansa Rostock is 45% better for: goals scored per match.
1.3 goals / match - Saarbrucken · 1.89 goals / match - Hansa Rostock
Hansa Rostock is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.43 goals / match - Saarbrucken · 1.24 goals / match - Hansa Rostock
Saarbrucken scores in 73% of matches (27 of 37 matches), while Hansa Rostock keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 37 matches).
Hansa Rostock scores in 78% of matches (29 of 37 matches), while Saarbrucken keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 37 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Saarbrucken
Over / Under - Hansa Rostock
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hansa Rostock is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / match - Saarbrucken · 1.57 pts / match - Hansa Rostock
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Saarbrucken - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Hansa Rostock - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Saarbrucken
Hansa Rostock
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Saarbrucken | Liga | Hansa Rostock | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.73 | 3.17 | • 3.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 62% | 64% | ▼ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 64% | ▼ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 21% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 76% | • 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 82% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Saarbrucken 0 - 1 - 0 Hansa Rostock. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Saarbrucken vs Hansa Rostock?
The 3. Liga match finished Saarbrucken 3:4 Hansa Rostock. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Saarbrucken vs Hansa Rostock?
Saarbrucken score 1.30 goals per game on average and Hansa Rostock 1.89. The 3. Liga average is 3.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Saarbrucken's matches and 57% of Hansa Rostock's.
What form are Saarbrucken and Hansa Rostock in?
Over the last 5 games Saarbrucken have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Hansa Rostock 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Saarbrucken vs Hansa Rostock?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


