Saarbrucken vs Waldhof Mannheim: match statistics
Saarbrucken vs Waldhof Mannheim: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Saarbrucken played Waldhof Mannheim in 3. Liga (Germany). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Saarbrucken: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Waldhof Mannheim: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Saarbrucken scores 1.26 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Waldhof Mannheim scores 1.63 and concedes 1.86. League average: 3.15 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Saarbrucken 63%, Waldhof Mannheim 71%. Over 2.5: Saarbrucken 43%, Waldhof Mannheim 71%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.
xG, shots and style
Waldhof Mannheim has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.58. Saarbrucken: 13.2 shots per match, Waldhof Mannheim: 13.4.
Match halves
Saarbrucken: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.60. Waldhof Mannheim: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 1.09.
Goals by minute
Saarbrucken: 0-15 (9 goals). Waldhof Mannheim: 46-60 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3. Liga: 3.15 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Saarbrücken at home averages 1.53 goals scored and concedes 1.06 goals per match, with xG 1.76 for the hosts versus 1.42 for opponents and a positive home goal differential of +8. Waldhof away averages only 1.47 goals scored but concedes as many as 2.06 goals per match, has negative xG (1.50 for vs 1.74 against) and a negative away differential of -10. In the last 5 matches Saarbrücken averaged 1.6 points per game (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss) and scored 4 goals, while Waldhof has 0.8 ppg (0 wins, 4 draws, 1 loss) although they scored 8 and conceded 11, which indicates significant defensive instability from the visitors. Additionally the hosts create more chances (15.29 shots and 5.12 on target at home vs 12 shots and 4.53 on target for the visitors) despite Waldhof having a slightly better conversion rate (12% vs 10%). Given the hosts' better defense, higher xG for Saarbrücken and Waldhof's poor away record, I favor the home win (55%), price the draw at 25% and the away win at 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are high: Saarbrücken 72% and Waldhof Mannheim 71%, exceeding the league level of 64% and indicating a Goal/Goal scenario. In the last 5 matches Waldhof has 100% BTTS (8 scored and 11 conceded, avg 1.6 scored and 2.2 conceded), while Saarbrücken has 40% BTTS and 4 scored/4 conceded (0.8/0.8), showing greater consistency from Waldhof in both-teams-to-score games. xG also supports BTTS: Saarbrücken xG_for 1.72 vs Waldhof xG_against 1.74, and Waldhof xG_for 1.50 vs Saarbrücken xG_against 1.43 — both pairs are close and above ~1.4, indicating realistic scoring chances for both sides. Low clean sheet expected rates (11% and 6%), a higher number of on-target shots for Saarbrücken (5.67 vs 4.53), and a high share of matches over 2.5 goals (78% and 65%) plus the combined over 2.5 & BTTS frequency (67% and 59%) further reinforce the Goal/Goal scenario. Based on this I estimate BTTS probability at 78% vs 22% for No Goal and recommend 'BTTS - Yes' as the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG- and defense-based model yields a combined expected goals total of approximately 3.19: home xG 1.72 correlated with xG against for the away team 1.74 gives ~1.73 for Saarbrücken, while away xG 1.50 with xG against for the home team 1.43 gives ~1.46 for Waldhof. Poisson simulations with lambda=3.19 produce probabilities of Over 1.5 ≈82.7%, Over 2.5 ≈61.8% and Over 3.5 ≈39.5%. Seasonal metrics confirm offensive tendencies: Over 1.5 occurred in 89% of Saarbrücken’s matches and 88% of Waldhof’s matches, while Over 2.5 appears in 78% of home matches and 65% of away matches; both teams score in 72% and 71% of matches respectively. Additionally, hosts average 5.67 shots on target and 1.72 xG per match, while visitors average 4.53 shots on target and 1.50 xG, which increases the chance of goals from both sides. In light of the model and seasonal figures, the strongest signal is the Over 1.5 bet (backing the over at line 1.5) with an estimated probability of ~83%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Saarbrücken holds an xG advantage (1.72 versus Waldhof’s 1.50) and scores 1.78 goals per home match compared to Waldhof’s 1.47 away goals, which favors a home win. At half-time the home side averages 0.67 goals versus the visitors’ 0.41, while Waldhof concedes on average 0.94 goals before the break and has conceded 1.2 goals before half-time in their last 5 matches, so a Saarbrücken lead at the break is realistic. Additionally, both teams have scored in 72% and 71% of their matches respectively, and at least one goal is scored in the second half in 89%/88% of fixtures, so I expect goals after the break and a home victory, albeit with involvement from the visitors. Waldhof are in poor form – 0% wins in the last 5 matches and conceding 2.2 goals per game on average – which limits their chances of a turnaround. Based on this, the most probable HT/FT scenario is 1/1 (home leading at half-time and winning at full-time); I assign it a 30% probability, and the overall chance of a Saarbrücken win in this forecast is about 53%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Saarbrucken | Waldhof Mannheim | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Saarbrucken is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Saarbrucken · 0.8 pts / match - Waldhof Mannheim
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Waldhof Mannheim is 29% better for: goals scored per match.
1.26 goals / match - Saarbrucken · 1.63 goals / match - Waldhof Mannheim
Saarbrucken is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.43 goals / match - Saarbrucken · 1.86 goals / match - Waldhof Mannheim
Saarbrucken scores in 71% of matches (25 of 35 matches), while Waldhof Mannheim keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 35 matches).
Waldhof Mannheim scores in 80% of matches (28 of 35 matches), while Saarbrucken keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 35 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Saarbrucken
Over / Under - Waldhof Mannheim
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Saarbrucken - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 26%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Waldhof Mannheim - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Saarbrucken
Waldhof Mannheim
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Saarbrucken | Liga | Waldhof Mannheim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.69 | 3.15 | ▲ 3.49 |
| Both teams scored | • 63% | 64% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 64% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 21% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | • 77% | 76% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 83% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Saarbrucken 0 - 0 - 1 Waldhof Mannheim. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Saarbrucken vs Waldhof Mannheim?
The 3. Liga match finished Saarbrucken 2:0 Waldhof Mannheim. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Saarbrucken vs Waldhof Mannheim?
Saarbrucken score 1.26 goals per game on average and Waldhof Mannheim 1.63. The 3. Liga average is 3.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Saarbrucken's matches and 71% of Waldhof Mannheim's.
What form are Saarbrucken and Waldhof Mannheim in?
Over the last 5 games Saarbrucken have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Waldhof Mannheim 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Saarbrucken vs Waldhof Mannheim?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Saarbrucken vs Waldhof Mannheim: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


