Sabah vs PDRM: match statistics
Sabah vs PDRM: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sabah play PDRM in Super League (Malaysia). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Sabah: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. PDRM: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sabah scores 1.17 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. PDRM scores 0.71 and concedes 3.29. League average: 3.29 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sabah 63%, PDRM 50%. Over 2.5: Sabah 50%, PDRM 75%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Sabah has higher xG: 1.33 vs 0.90. Sabah: 11.6 shots per match, PDRM: 6.3.
Match halves
Sabah: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.75. PDRM: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Sabah: 76-90+ (7 goals). PDRM: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Sabah holds a clear advantage in chance quality and home-field edge: at home they average 11.6 shots and 3.4 on target per match with xG 1.32 and 1.0 goals scored on average, while PDRM away produce just 5.7 shots (2.2 on target), have xG 0.73 and 0.6 goals on average. The defensive gap is significant — Sabah concedes 1.9 goals at home on average and has conceded 3 goals in their last 5 matches, whereas PDRM concede 3.2 goals away and as many as 22 goals in their last 5 outings. Conversion stats also favor the hosts: Sabah fail to score in 20% of home matches, while PDRM fail to score in 50% of away games, and the visitors’ away goal difference is -26 versus -9 for the hosts. Point form is poor on both sides, but Sabah have 0.8 pts per game in the last 5 (0 wins, 4 draws, 1 loss) versus 0.6 pts for PDRM (1 win, 4 losses), providing greater stability for the home side. Considering the higher xG (1.32 vs 0.73), more chances (11.6 vs 5.7) and the visitors’ catastrophic defense, I assign the highest probability to a Sabah win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sabah | PDRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sabah is 600% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Sabah · 0.2 pts / match - PDRM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sabah is 65% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Sabah · 0.71 goals / match - PDRM
Sabah is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.83 goals / match - Sabah · 3.29 goals / match - PDRM
Sabah scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while PDRM keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 matches).
PDRM scores in 54% of matches (13 of 24 matches), while Sabah keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Sabah
Over / Under — PDRM
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sabah is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.88 pts / match - Sabah · 0.79 pts / match - PDRM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sabah - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
PDRM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 2.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -10 | -8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -16 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sabah
PDRM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Sabah | Liga | PDRM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.00 | 3.29 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 49% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 28% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 78% | • 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 81% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Sabah 1 - 0 - 0 PDRM. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sabah vs PDRM?
The Super League match finished Sabah 5:1 PDRM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sabah vs PDRM?
Sabah score 1.17 goals per game on average and PDRM 0.71. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Sabah's matches and 50% of PDRM's.
What form are Sabah and PDRM in?
Over the last 5 games Sabah have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and PDRM 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sabah vs PDRM?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.