Lebanon - Lebanese Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Safa vs Tadamon Sour: match statistics

Safa crest
Safa
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Tadamon Sour crest
Tadamon Sour
150%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

Safa displays solid home form with a 50% win rate at their own stadium, an impressive goal difference of +2, and 50% clean sheets in home matches. The hosts concede an average of only 0.5 goals per match at home, which constitutes a significant defensive advantage. Despite decent possession (52%) and better shot conversion (16% vs 13%), Tadamon Sour shows clearly weaker form with just 1 point per match in the last 5 fixtures. The visitors have a balanced goal difference on the road (0), but 40% losses and lower point efficiency suggest difficulties in gaining points away from home. Given Safa's defensive advantage on their own turf and the visitors' weaker recent form, I expect a home victory, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to both teams' tendency for low scores.

Safa vs Tadamon Sour: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Safa played Tadamon Sour in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match was played on 24 January 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Safa: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Tadamon Sour: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Safa scores 1.09 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Tadamon Sour scores 0.64 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Safa 27%, Tadamon Sour 27%. Over 2.5: Safa 18%, Tadamon Sour 27%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Safa has higher xG: 0.93 vs 0.80. Safa: 4.3 shots per match, Tadamon Sour: 4.1.

Match halves

Safa: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.64. Tadamon Sour: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.36.

Goals by minute

Safa: 31-45+ (4 goals). Tadamon Sour: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Lebanese Premier League: 2.29 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Safa displays solid home form with a 50% win rate at their own stadium, an impressive goal difference of +2, and 50% clean sheets in home matches. The hosts concede an average of only 0.5 goals per match at home, which constitutes a significant defensive advantage. Despite decent possession (52%) and better shot conversion (16% vs 13%), Tadamon Sour shows clearly weaker form with just 1 point per match in the last 5 fixtures. The visitors have a balanced goal difference on the road (0), but 40% losses and lower point efficiency suggest difficulties in gaining points away from home. Given Safa's defensive advantage on their own turf and the visitors' weaker recent form, I expect a home victory, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to both teams' tendency for low scores.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
SafaTadamon Sour
13Shots2
SafaTadamon Sour
7Shots on target1
SafaTadamon Sour
1.8xG0.49
SafaTadamon Sour
4Corners0
SafaTadamon Sour
68Dangerous attacks40
SafaTadamon Sour
-1Fouls-1
SafaTadamon Sour
-1Cards-1
SafaTadamon Sour

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.09Goals scored / match0.64
SafaTadamon Sour
0.73Goals conceded / match1
SafaTadamon Sour
46%Average possession44%
SafaTadamon Sour
2Shots on target / match1.82
SafaTadamon Sour

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.27Shots per match4.09
SafaTadamon Sour
2Shots on target1.82
SafaTadamon Sour
25.5%Shot conversion15.6%
SafaTadamon Sour
46%Possession44%
SafaTadamon Sour
0.93xG for0.8
SafaTadamon Sour
1.11xG against1.07
SafaTadamon Sour

Shooting quality

Safa: Counter-attackingTadamon Sour: Counter-attacking
SafaTadamon Sour
Accuracy (shots on target)47%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.550.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tadamon Sour is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Safa · 1.6 pts / match - Tadamon Sour

Safa
WLLLW
Season result split
36% W18% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-5
1.27 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Tadamon Sour
WWDDL
Season result split
18% W45% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Safa is 70% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - Safa · 0.64 goals / match - Tadamon Sour

Safa is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.73 goals / match - Safa · 1 goals / match - Tadamon Sour

Safa scoring profile: more difficult

Safa scores in 45% of matches (5 of 11 matches), while Tadamon Sour keeps a clean sheet in 55% (6 of 11 matches).

Tadamon Sour scoring profile: mixed

Tadamon Sour scores in 45% of matches (5 of 11 matches), while Safa keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

12Goals scored (season)7
SafaTadamon Sour
8Goals conceded (season)11
SafaTadamon Sour
1.82Average goals in match1.64
SafaTadamon Sour
3Goals scored (last 5)4
SafaTadamon Sour
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
SafaTadamon Sour

How often they score at least...

45%1 goal45%
SafaTadamon Sour
27%2 goals9%
SafaTadamon Sour
9%3 goals9%
SafaTadamon Sour
9%4 goals0%
SafaTadamon Sour

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal45%
SafaTadamon Sour
0%2 goals36%
SafaTadamon Sour
0%3 goals18%
SafaTadamon Sour
0%4 goals0%
SafaTadamon Sour

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time9%
SafaTadamon Sour
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SafaTadamon Sour
18%Scored in both halves9%
SafaTadamon Sour

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
SafaTadamon Sour
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
SafaTadamon Sour
20%BTTS - last 50%
SafaTadamon Sour

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

18%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
SafaTadamon Sour
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
SafaTadamon Sour
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
SafaTadamon Sour

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time45%
SafaTadamon Sour
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
SafaTadamon Sour
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SafaTadamon Sour

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Safa is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - Safa · 1 pts / match - Tadamon Sour

Safa - half-time state
18% leading82% draw0% trailing
Tadamon Sour - half-time state
18% leading45% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1
SafaTadamon Sour
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.27
SafaTadamon Sour
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
SafaTadamon Sour
0.45Average goals (1st half)0.91
SafaTadamon Sour
100%Clean sheet before half-time64%
SafaTadamon Sour
82%No goal before half-time73%
SafaTadamon Sour

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)1
SafaTadamon Sour
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.36
SafaTadamon Sour
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
SafaTadamon Sour
1.36Average goals (2nd half)0.73
SafaTadamon Sour
27%Clean sheet after half-time64%
SafaTadamon Sour
55%No goal after half-time73%
SafaTadamon Sour

Safa - second-half results

36% W18% R45% P
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tadamon Sour - second-half results

9% W73% R18% P
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Safa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.01.4
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Tadamon Sour - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Safa
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
4
0
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
1
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Tadamon Sour
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
4
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
76%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
20%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
30%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Safa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Tadamon Sour

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).

Teams vs league

SafaLigaTadamon Sour
Average goals in match 1.822.29 1.64
Both teams scored 27%31% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%41% 27%
Clean sheets 27%41% 55%
Goal before half-time 18%57% 55%
Goal after half-time 91%75% 45%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.29
Average goals per match
31%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

muhammad kadouh kadouhA 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SafaAssistmuhammad kadouh kadouh

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Safa 0 - 1 - 0 Tadamon Sour. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Tadamon Sour
1 : 1
Safa

FAQ

What was the result of Safa vs Tadamon Sour?

The Lebanese Premier League match finished Safa 2:0 Tadamon Sour. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Safa vs Tadamon Sour?

Safa score 1.09 goals per game on average and Tadamon Sour 0.64. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Safa's matches and 27% of Tadamon Sour's.

What form are Safa and Tadamon Sour in?

Over the last 5 games Safa have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Tadamon Sour 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Safa vs Tadamon Sour?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.