Japan - J-League CupData current as of 14 October 2026

Sagan Tosu vs Avispa Fukuoka: match statistics

Sagan Tosu crest
Sagan Tosu
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Avispa Fukuoka crest
Avispa Fukuoka

Sagan Tosu vs Avispa Fukuoka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sagan Tosu played Avispa Fukuoka in J-League Cup (Japan). The match was played on 14 October 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Sagan Tosu: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Avispa Fukuoka: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sagan Tosu scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Avispa Fukuoka scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sagan Tosu 100%, Avispa Fukuoka 100%. Over 2.5: Sagan Tosu 100%, Avispa Fukuoka 100%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Avispa Fukuoka has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.47. Sagan Tosu: 12.0 shots per match, Avispa Fukuoka: 16.0.

Match halves

Sagan Tosu: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50. Avispa Fukuoka: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Sagan Tosu: 16-30 (1 goals). Avispa Fukuoka: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J-League Cup: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Avispa Fukuoka hold a slight edge thanks to their more solid defensive record: away from home, they allow opponents chances worth an average xG of 1.19, while Sagan Tosu concede an xG of 1.91 at home. Both teams average 2 goals per match in these conditions, although the hosts create slightly more chances, recording an xG of 1.95 compared with 1.75 for the visitors. However, Sagan have lost 4 of their last five matches and conceded 8 goals, while Avispa have suffered 3 defeats and conceded 5. Sagan's advantage is their record of 2 wins in 2 home matches so far, which means the visitors' edge is not substantial. Nevertheless, Avispa's better record of limiting the quality of opponents' chances and their slightly stronger recent form point to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In their last five matches, both teams averaged just 0.6 goals, and each recorded BTTS in 40% of their games. This points to a considerable risk that at least one side will fail to score, although Sagan Tosu conceded an average of 1.6 goals during this period and Avispa Fukuoka 1.0. Avispa have stronger attacking numbers in the available season data, averaging 2.0 goals with an xG of 1.75, but their average xG fell to 1.12 over their last five appearances. Sagan, meanwhile, posted an xG of 1.52 recently but scored just 3 goals in five matches. Therefore, BTTS - No has a slight edge over the scenario in which both teams score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, Sagan Tosu averaged 0.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Avispa Fukuoka averaged 0.6 scored and 1.0 conceded, pointing to limited goal-scoring potential for both teams. The Over 2.5 goals line landed in 40% of Sagan’s matches and just 20% of Avispa’s, despite the competition average standing at 2.83 goals. The xG data is less conclusive: Sagan created chances worth an average of 1.52 goals, while Avispa allowed chances worth 1.79, yet both teams scored just 3 goals in their last 5 matches. Avispa’s cup stats show 2 goals scored and 1 conceded, but Sagan’s averages of zero do not provide grounds to treat them as confirmation of a solid home defence. Therefore, Under 3.5 goals is the safer pick: with a projected total of 2.2 goals, this line offers a clearer edge than Under 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: both teams were level at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches, and neither scored in the first half in those games. After the break, the visitors hold a slight edge, as Sagan conceded an average of 1.2 goals in the second half across their last five matches, compared with 0.8 for Avispa. Across full matches, both teams scored an average of 0.6 goals, but Sagan conceded 1.6 compared with Avispa’s 1.0, increasing the visitors’ chances of deciding a closely contested match. Avispa’s cup match so far provides further support for the X/2 scenario: after a draw at the break, they scored twice in the second half and won. However, this is a limited sample, so a draw after 90 minutes remains a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
12Shots7
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
2Shots on target3
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
1.36xG1.17
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
7Corners2
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
64Dangerous attacks72
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
9Fouls6
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
2Cards0
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
2Goals scored / match2
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
1Goals conceded / match1
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
49%Average possession59%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
5Shots on target / match6
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match16
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
5Shots on target6
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
16.7%Shot conversion12.5%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
49%Possession59%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
1.47xG for1.75
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
1.75xG against1.19
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

Shooting quality

Sagan Tosu: Efficient finishingAvispa Fukuoka: Dominant
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
Accuracy (shots on target)42%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sagan Tosu
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Avispa Fukuoka
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sagan Tosu scoring profile: very strong

Sagan Tosu scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Avispa Fukuoka keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

Avispa Fukuoka scoring profile: very strong

Avispa Fukuoka scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Sagan Tosu keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

4Goals scored (season)2
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
2Goals conceded (season)1
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
3Average goals in match3
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
4Goals scored (last 5)2
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
2Goals conceded (last 5)1
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
100%2 goals100%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0%3 goals0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0%4 goals0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0%2 goals0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0%3 goals0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0%4 goals0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
League average

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
50%Scored in both halves100%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
100%BTTS - last 5100%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Avispa Fukuoka is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Sagan Tosu · 3 pts / match - Avispa Fukuoka

Sagan Tosu - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Avispa Fukuoka - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)3
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0.5Goals scored (1st half)1
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
1Average goals (1st half)1
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
50%No goal before half-time0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)1
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)1
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
2Average goals (2nd half)2
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
50%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka
0%No goal after half-time0%
Sagan TosuAvispa Fukuoka

Sagan Tosu - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Avispa Fukuoka - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sagan Tosu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.003.00
Goals scored / match0.51.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1
Avispa Fukuoka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sagan Tosu
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Avispa Fukuoka
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sagan Tosu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
179%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Avispa Fukuoka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J-League Cup).

Teams vs league

Sagan TosuLigaAvispa Fukuoka
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.85▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%44%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%54%▲ 100%
Clean sheets▼ 0%32%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%71%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%80%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / match
1.73
Away goals / match
+-35%
Home attack advantage
+-54%
Home defence advantage
+-32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sagan TosuYellow cardHaruya Goto
  2. Sagan TosuYellow cardShivatafari Nagasawa
  3. Sagan TosuGoalKaito YoshinoAssist: Kanta Jojo
  4. Avispa FukuokaGoalYu HashimotoAssist: Daiki Miya
  5. Avispa FukuokaSubstitutionOn: Yuji KitajimaOff: Ichika Maeda
  6. Avispa FukuokaSubstitutionOn: Masaya TashiroOff: Yuji Kitajima
  7. Sagan TosuSubstitutionOn: Rio HyonOff: Hikaru Nakahara
  8. Sagan TosuSubstitutionOn: Tatsunori SakuraiOff: Kakeru Yamauchi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Sagan Tosu vs Avispa Fukuoka?

The J-League Cup match finished Sagan Tosu 2:1 Avispa Fukuoka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sagan Tosu vs Avispa Fukuoka?

Sagan Tosu score 2.00 goals per game on average and Avispa Fukuoka 2.00. The J-League Cup average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Sagan Tosu's matches and 100% of Avispa Fukuoka's.

What form are Sagan Tosu and Avispa Fukuoka in?

Over the last 5 games Sagan Tosu have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Avispa Fukuoka 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sagan Tosu vs Avispa Fukuoka?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.