Iran - Azadegan LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Saipa vs Damash Gilanian: match statistics

Saipa vs Damash Gilanian: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Saipa play Damash Gilanian in Azadegan League (Iran). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Current form

Saipa: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Damash Gilanian: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Saipa scores 0.86 and concedes 0.43 goals per match. Damash Gilanian scores 0.52 and concedes 1.43. League average: 1.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Saipa 19%, Damash Gilanian 48%. Over 2.5: Saipa 24%, Damash Gilanian 33%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Saipa has higher xG: 1.34 vs 0.88. Saipa: 5.4 shots per match, Damash Gilanian: 1.4.

Match halves

Saipa: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.43. Damash Gilanian: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Saipa: 0-15 (4 goals). Damash Gilanian: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.52 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SaipaDamash Gilanian
0.86Goals scored / match0.52
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0.43Goals conceded / match1.43
SaipaDamash Gilanian
30%Average possession15%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
2Shots on target / match0.24
SaipaDamash Gilanian

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.43Shots per match1.43
SaipaDamash Gilanian
2Shots on target0.24
SaipaDamash Gilanian
15.8%Shot conversion36.7%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
30%Possession15%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
1.34xG for0.88
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0.8xG against1.2
SaipaDamash Gilanian

Shooting quality

Saipa: Counter-attackingDamash Gilanian: Counter-attacking
SaipaDamash Gilanian
Accuracy (shots on target)37%17%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.250.62
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.432.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Saipa is 140% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Saipa · 1 pts / match - Damash Gilanian

Saipa
WLWWW
Season result split
48% W33% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-4
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Damash Gilanian
DLLDW
Season result split
5% W43% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-9-11
0.57 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.31Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Saipa is 65% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - Saipa · 0.52 goals / match - Damash Gilanian

Saipa is 233% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.43 goals / match - Saipa · 1.43 goals / match - Damash Gilanian

Saipa scoring profile: strong

Saipa scores in 62% of matches (13 of 21 matches), while Damash Gilanian keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).

Damash Gilanian scoring profile: more difficult

Damash Gilanian scores in 48% of matches (10 of 21 matches), while Saipa keeps a clean sheet in 71% (15 of 21 matches).

18Goals scored (season)11
SaipaDamash Gilanian
9Goals conceded (season)30
SaipaDamash Gilanian
1.29Average goals in match1.95
SaipaDamash Gilanian
5Goals scored (last 5)3
SaipaDamash Gilanian
2Goals conceded (last 5)7
SaipaDamash Gilanian

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal48%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
19%2 goals5%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
5%3 goals0%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0%4 goals0%
SaipaDamash Gilanian

How often they concede at least...

29%1 goal76%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
14%2 goals38%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0%3 goals14%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0%4 goals10%
SaipaDamash Gilanian

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time19%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
5%BTTS in both halves0%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
14%Scored in both halves5%
SaipaDamash Gilanian

BTTS and goal count

19%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
20%BTTS - last 540%
SaipaDamash Gilanian

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
SaipaDamash Gilanian

2nd half

52%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
SaipaDamash Gilanian

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Saipa is 123% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Saipa · 0.62 pts / match - Damash Gilanian

Saipa - half-time state
24% leading67% draw10% trailing
Damash Gilanian - half-time state
0% leading62% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)0.62
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.19
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0.19Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0.62Average goals (1st half)0.76
SaipaDamash Gilanian
81%Clean sheet before half-time48%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
67%No goal before half-time81%
SaipaDamash Gilanian

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)0.71
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0.24Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
SaipaDamash Gilanian
0.67Average goals (2nd half)1.19
SaipaDamash Gilanian
81%Clean sheet after half-time38%
SaipaDamash Gilanian
57%No goal after half-time67%
SaipaDamash Gilanian

Saipa - second-half results

33% W57% R10% P
29
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Damash Gilanian - second-half results

5% W57% R38% P
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.62
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Saipa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Damash Gilanian - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Saipa
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Damash Gilanian
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
0
4
16-30
3
4
31-45
0
5
46-60
0
6
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.62
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Saipa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Damash Gilanian

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
161%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
64% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
64%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

SaipaLigaDamash Gilanian
Average goals in match 1.291.52 1.95
Both teams scored 19%33% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 24%22% 33%
Clean sheets 71%45% 24%
Goal before half-time 43%46% 52%
Goal after half-time 52%57% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.52
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
45%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / match
0.63
Away goals / match
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Saipa 1 - 0 - 0 Damash Gilanian. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Damash Gilanian
0 : 2
Saipa