Saipa vs Mes Shahr-e Babak: match statistics
Saipa vs Mes Shahr-e Babak: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Saipa played Mes Shahr-e Babak in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 27 May 2026. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Saipa: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Mes Shahr-e Babak: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Saipa scores 0.84 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. Mes Shahr-e Babak scores 1.00 and concedes 0.44. League average: 1.48 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Saipa 28%, Mes Shahr-e Babak 32%. Over 2.5: Saipa 28%, Mes Shahr-e Babak 16%. League level: BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 21%.
xG, shots and style
Saipa has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.13. Saipa: 4.7 shots per match, Mes Shahr-e Babak: 4.9.
Match halves
Saipa: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.40. Mes Shahr-e Babak: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.48.
Goals by minute
Saipa: 0-15 (5 goals). Mes Shahr-e Babak: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.48 goals per match, BTTS 31%, Over 2.5 21%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mes Shahr-e Babak are the clear favorites: the visitors sit 1st in the table with a record of 14 wins, 9 draws and only 2 losses, while Saipa are 5th with 10 wins and 6 losses. In their last 5 matches Mes have 4 wins and 1 draw, scoring 4 goals and conceding none (averaging 2.6 points per match), whereas Saipa have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, also scoring 4 but conceding 6 (averaging 1.0 point per match). Saipa’s home metrics show good defensive organization: on average 0.5 goals conceded per home match and 67% of home games with a clean sheet, with home xG of 1.32, however their home attack yields only 1.0 goals per match. The visitors on the road concede 0.42 goals on average and have an xG for 1.03, and over the season Mes have scored 25 goals versus Saipa’s 21, giving them an edge in efficiency and form. Given the superior season record and the clearer run of results for the visitors, I predict a Mes Shahr-e Babak victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I indicate 'No' (BTTS - No) because both teams have very low goals conceded averages: Saipa concedes 0.46 goals/match, Mes Shahr-e Babak 0.42, with clean sheet rates of 54% and 67% respectively. Seasonal shares of matches with both teams scoring are low — 38% for Saipa and 25% for Mes — while the league average BTTS is only 31%, indicating a general trend. xG metrics do not change the picture: Saipa has xG 1.19 versus the visitors' 1.03, but Mes has xG against 1.21 while actually conceding just 0.42, and the visitors have kept a clean sheet in the last 5 matches (last 5: 0.0 conceded), whereas Saipa conceded an average of 1.2 goals in their last 5. The competition is low-scoring (1.49 goals per match on average) and only 23% of Saipa’s matches and 8% of Mes’s matches finish over 2.5 goals, which further limits the likelihood of both teams scoring. Therefore I assign a 75% probability to 'No' and 25% to 'Yes' (BTTS - No 75% / BTTS - Yes 25%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining xG and both teams' defensive metrics yields expected goals of 1.20 for Saipa (attacking xG 1.19 vs opponent xG conceded 1.21) and 0.99 for Mes Shahr-e Babak (attacking xG 1.03 vs hosts’ xG conceded 0.95), totaling 2.19. Seasonal percentages show Saipa has 23% of matches over 2.5 goals (77% under), Mes Shahr-e Babak only 8% over 2.5 (92% under), and for the 1.5 line the over rates are 46% and 33% respectively, indicating a tendency toward low-scoring games. In the last 5 matches both teams scored 4 goals each (0.8 per match on average), and Mes Shahr-e Babak kept 5 consecutive clean sheets (ga_l5_away = 0.0), which further reduces the chance of 3+ goals. A Poisson model based on xG (total 2.19) gives ~64% probability for Over 1.5 and ~37% for Over 2.5, but combining this with seasonal Over 2.5 shares (23% and 8%) I adjust Over 2.5 down to ~25% (Under 75%). Based on this the strongest signal is Under 2.5 (pick: under 2.5), while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~8% over / 92% under).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Saipa as the home side led at half-time in 8 matches, i.e. in 62% of home fixtures, scoring an average of 0.62 goals by the break while conceding only 0.08 – a strong signal that HT will finish with the home side leading. Over the full 90 minutes Saipa wins 69% of home games, averages 1.15 goals per match and secures 2.31 points per home game; they have an xG of 1.19 versus opponents’ defensive xG of 0.95 and register 4.5 shots on target per match vs 3.17 for their rivals, which increases the likelihood of holding the lead and converting it into a win. At the same time Mes Shahr-e Babak are in good form – 80% wins in their last 5 matches – and tend to score late goals (5 goals in minutes 76–90), which raises the probability of leveling the match after the interval. Additionally, both teams frequently keep clean sheets at half-time (Saipa 92% HT clean sheets, Mes 100%), so halves are usually low-scoring and turnarounds are rare; therefore the strongest signal is for 1/1 (42%), while other scenarios (e.g. X/X 18% or X/1 12%) are treated as moderate alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Saipa | Mes Shahr-e Babak | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.28 | 0.23 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.51 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 160% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Saipa · 2.6 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
0.84 goals / match - Saipa · 1 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.6 goals / match - Saipa · 0.44 goals / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Saipa scores in 64% of matches (16 of 25 matches), while Mes Shahr-e Babak keeps a clean sheet in 60% (15 of 25 matches).
Mes Shahr-e Babak scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Saipa keeps a clean sheet in 64% (16 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Saipa
Over / Under - Mes Shahr-e Babak
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mes Shahr-e Babak is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / match - Saipa · 1.92 pts / match - Mes Shahr-e Babak
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Saipa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Mes Shahr-e Babak - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Saipa
Mes Shahr-e Babak
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Saipa | Liga | Mes Shahr-e Babak | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.44 | 1.48 | • 1.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 28% | 31% | • 32% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 28% | 21% | ▼ 16% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 64% | 47% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 48% | 45% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 56% | 54% | ▲ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Saipa 0 - 0 - 1 Mes Shahr-e Babak. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Saipa vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
The Azadegan League match finished Saipa 1:0 Mes Shahr-e Babak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Saipa vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
Saipa score 0.84 goals per game on average and Mes Shahr-e Babak 1.00. The Azadegan League average is 1.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Saipa's matches and 32% of Mes Shahr-e Babak's.
What form are Saipa and Mes Shahr-e Babak in?
Over the last 5 games Saipa have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Mes Shahr-e Babak 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Saipa vs Mes Shahr-e Babak?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Saipa vs Mes Shahr-e Babak: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


