Iran - Azadegan LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Saipa vs Navad Urmia: match statistics

Saipa crest
Saipa
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Navad Urmia crest
Navad Urmia
155%(1.93)
X30%(2.63)
215%(4.90)

Saipa are showing solid home form with 71% clean sheets and only a 14% loss rate at their own ground, which makes them a tough opponent for visiting sides. Navad Urmia have poor away results—50% losses, only 13% wins, and just 0.5 goals scored per away match on average. The hosts hold the edge in expected goals (xG 1.29 vs 1.0) and post better efficiency in possession (54% vs 47%). The last five-match form also favours Saipa (1.6 points per game vs 1.0). Navad Urmia fail to score in 50% of away matches, which could be decisive against the hosts’ solid defence. Taking all stats into account, Saipa have a clear advantage, although their tendency to draw at home (57%) cannot be ignored.

Saipa vs Navad Urmia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Saipa played Navad Urmia in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 3 January 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Saipa: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Navad Urmia: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Saipa scores 0.81 and concedes 0.44 goals per match. Navad Urmia scores 0.75 and concedes 0.69. League average: 1.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Saipa 19%, Navad Urmia 44%. Over 2.5: Saipa 25%, Navad Urmia 13%. League level: BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 21%.

xG, shots and style

Saipa has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.00. Saipa: 6.7 shots per match, Navad Urmia: 1.9.

Match halves

Saipa: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.38. Navad Urmia: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.44.

Goals by minute

Saipa: 0-15 (3 goals). Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.49 goals per match, BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 21%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Saipa are showing solid home form with 71% clean sheets and only a 14% loss rate at their own ground, which makes them a tough opponent for visiting sides. Navad Urmia have poor away results—50% losses, only 13% wins, and just 0.5 goals scored per away match on average. The hosts hold the edge in expected goals (xG 1.29 vs 1.0) and post better efficiency in possession (54% vs 47%). The last five-match form also favours Saipa (1.6 points per game vs 1.0). Navad Urmia fail to score in 50% of away matches, which could be decisive against the hosts’ solid defence. Taking all stats into account, Saipa have a clear advantage, although their tendency to draw at home (57%) cannot be ignored.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
SaipaNavad Urmia
11Shots10
SaipaNavad Urmia
6Shots on target4
SaipaNavad Urmia
1.5xG1.31
SaipaNavad Urmia
6Corners5
SaipaNavad Urmia
54Dangerous attacks55
SaipaNavad Urmia
-1Fouls-1
SaipaNavad Urmia
-1Cards-1
SaipaNavad Urmia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.81Goals scored / match0.75
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.44Goals conceded / match0.69
SaipaNavad Urmia
36%Average possession14%
SaipaNavad Urmia
2.5Shots on target / match0.19
SaipaNavad Urmia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.69Shots per match1.88
SaipaNavad Urmia
2.5Shots on target0.19
SaipaNavad Urmia
12.1%Shot conversion40%
SaipaNavad Urmia
36%Possession14%
SaipaNavad Urmia
1.33xG for1
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.76xG against1.24
SaipaNavad Urmia

Shooting quality

Saipa: Counter-attackingNavad Urmia: Counter-attacking
SaipaNavad Urmia
Accuracy (shots on target)37%10%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.53
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.323.95

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Saipa is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Saipa · 1 pts / match - Navad Urmia

Saipa
DWDWL
Season result split
38% W44% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-3
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 0.84BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Navad Urmia
WLDLD
Season result split
19% W56% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-9-4
1.13 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.63Opponent xG: 0.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Saipa is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - Saipa · 0.75 goals / match - Navad Urmia

Saipa is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.44 goals / match - Saipa · 0.69 goals / match - Navad Urmia

Saipa scoring profile: mixed

Saipa scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).

Navad Urmia scoring profile: more difficult

Navad Urmia scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Saipa keeps a clean sheet in 75% (12 of 16 matches).

13Goals scored (season)12
SaipaNavad Urmia
7Goals conceded (season)11
SaipaNavad Urmia
1.25Average goals in match1.44
SaipaNavad Urmia
5Goals scored (last 5)4
SaipaNavad Urmia
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
SaipaNavad Urmia

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal63%
SaipaNavad Urmia
19%2 goals6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
6%3 goals6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
0%4 goals0%
SaipaNavad Urmia

How often they concede at least...

25%1 goal63%
SaipaNavad Urmia
19%2 goals6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
0%3 goals0%
SaipaNavad Urmia
0%4 goals0%
SaipaNavad Urmia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
6%BTTS in both halves0%
SaipaNavad Urmia
13%Scored in both halves6%
SaipaNavad Urmia

BTTS and goal count

19%Min. 3 goals and BTTS6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
SaipaNavad Urmia
40%BTTS - last 560%
SaipaNavad Urmia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
SaipaNavad Urmia
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
SaipaNavad Urmia
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SaipaNavad Urmia

2nd half

44%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
SaipaNavad Urmia
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
SaipaNavad Urmia
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SaipaNavad Urmia

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Saipa is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Saipa · 1.13 pts / match - Navad Urmia

Saipa - half-time state
25% leading63% draw13% trailing
Navad Urmia - half-time state
19% leading56% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.13
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.31
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.19Goals conceded (1st half)0.31
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.63Average goals (1st half)0.63
SaipaNavad Urmia
81%Clean sheet before half-time69%
SaipaNavad Urmia
69%No goal before half-time75%
SaipaNavad Urmia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.25
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
SaipaNavad Urmia
0.63Average goals (2nd half)0.81
SaipaNavad Urmia
81%Clean sheet after half-time63%
SaipaNavad Urmia
63%No goal after half-time56%
SaipaNavad Urmia

Saipa - second-half results

25% W69% R6% P
22
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Navad Urmia - second-half results

19% W69% R13% P
18
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Saipa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Navad Urmia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Saipa
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
0
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
3
2
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.34
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Saipa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

SaipaLigaNavad Urmia
Average goals in match 1.251.49 1.44
Both teams scored 19%32% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%21% 13%
Clean sheets 75%45% 38%
Goal before half-time 44%46% 50%
Goal after half-time 44%57% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.49
Average goals per match
32%
Both teams scored
21%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
45%
Clean sheets
0.87
Home goals / match
0.63
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Saipa vs Navad Urmia?

The Azadegan League match finished Saipa 1:0 Navad Urmia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Saipa vs Navad Urmia?

Saipa score 0.81 goals per game on average and Navad Urmia 0.75. The Azadegan League average is 1.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 19% of Saipa's matches and 44% of Navad Urmia's.

What form are Saipa and Navad Urmia in?

Over the last 5 games Saipa have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Navad Urmia 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Saipa vs Navad Urmia?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Saipa vs Navad Urmia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.