Sambenedettese vs Arezzo: match statistics
Sambenedettese vs Arezzo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sambenedettese played Arezzo in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Sambenedettese: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Arezzo: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sambenedettese scores 0.76 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Arezzo scores 1.72 and concedes 0.69. League average: 2.26 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sambenedettese 39%, Arezzo 44%. Over 2.5: Sambenedettese 21%, Arezzo 44%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Arezzo has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.33. Sambenedettese: 10.7 shots per match, Arezzo: 14.3.
Match halves
Sambenedettese: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.39. Arezzo: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.16.
Goals by minute
Sambenedettese: 31-45+ (7 goals). Arezzo: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group B: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Arezzo is the clear favorite: they sit 1st in the table with 21 wins, while Sambenedettese has only 6 wins and is 17th. Goal stats favor the visitors decisively — Arezzo average 1.88 goals away and concede 0.56, whereas Sambenedettese at home score 0.5 and concede 1.06. The quality gap is reinforced by shots and efficiency: Arezzo average 14.63 shots and 5.25 on target per match with a 13% conversion, while the hosts average 11.44 shots, 3.81 on target and only 4% conversion. Arezzo also have higher xG (1.76 away vs. 1.39 xG for the hosts at home), a lower share of matches without a goal (13% vs. 69% for Sambenedettese) and 63% clean sheets on the road, indicating superior attacking efficiency and defensive stability. In the last 5 matches Arezzo scored 8 goals and Sambenedettese only 2, and Arezzo have a much higher away win rate (69% vs. 13% home wins for Sambenedettese). Considering these figures and the differences in effectiveness, I predict an away win; probabilities estimated at about 75% for Arezzo, 15% for a draw and 10% for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back No BTTS with a 65% probability versus 35% for BTTS - Yes. Arezzo has a seasonal clean sheet rate of 63% and a seasonal BTTS rate of only 38%, significantly below the league BTTS average of 50%, indicating a tendency for the visitors to keep clean sheets. Sambenedettese have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches (0.4 goals per match) and recorded BTTS in 20% of those games, showing a current struggle to create and convert chances. Additionally, Arezzo concedes 0.56 goals per match on average with xG against of 1.14, while Sambenedettese score 1.56 goals at home seasonally with a home clean sheet rate of 44%, so it is more likely the visitors will keep a clean sheet than the low-scoring home side breaking down that defense. Despite similar xG (1.67 vs 1.76) and identical 5.25 shots on target per match, Arezzo’s higher clean sheet percentage (63% vs 44%) and Sambenedettese’s poor finishing in the last 5 games support the No (No Goal/Both Teams Not To Score) scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculate expected goals at 1.41 for Sambenedettese and 1.36 for Arezzo, totaling 2.77, derived as the average of attack xG (1.67 vs 1.76) and opponent defense xG (1.14 vs 0.96). Season percentages for over 1.5 are 56% (home) and 69% (away), and for Over 2.5 are 38% and 50%, suggesting a higher probability of at least 2–3 goals. In the last 5 matches Sambenedettese have scored 2 goals (0.4/match), Arezzo 8 goals (1.6/match), which together with the higher xG for the visitors indicates offensive pressure from Arezzo. Considering the cumulative xG of 2.77, higher seasonal over 1.5/2.5 rates for the visitors and the league average of 2.26, the strongest signal is to play Over 2.5 (here assessed at 62%), while Over 3.5 remains unlikely (19% in line with the teams’ seasonal 19%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
On paper Arezzo looks stronger: average goals scored 1.88 versus Sambenedettese’s 1.56 and average points per match 2.31 versus 2.06, with the away win percentage 69% compared to 63% for home. Seasonally the home side are better in the first half — they score an average of 0.75 goals by the break versus 0.38 for the visitors and led at the break in 38% of matches, however in the last 5 games Sambenedettese did not lead at the break (0%) and were level at half-time in 80% of cases. After the break the advantage shifts to Arezzo: the visitors score an average of 1.50 goals in the second half versus 0.81 for the hosts and in 75% of cases the second half has been favorable to Arezzo. Additionally xG is similar (1.76 for the visitors versus 1.67 for the hosts), and the seasonal clean sheet rate for the visitors is 63% versus 44% for the hosts, which supports a turnaround after half-time. As a result the most likely outcome appears to be a draw at half-time and an away win at full-time (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sambenedettese | Arezzo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Arezzo is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Sambenedettese · 1.4 pts / match - Arezzo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arezzo is 126% better for: goals scored per match.
0.76 goals / match - Sambenedettese · 1.72 goals / match - Arezzo
Arezzo is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.03 goals / match - Sambenedettese · 0.69 goals / match - Arezzo
Sambenedettese scores in 52% of matches (17 of 33 matches), while Arezzo keeps a clean sheet in 53% (17 of 32 matches).
Arezzo scores in 91% of matches (29 of 32 matches), while Sambenedettese keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sambenedettese
Over / Under - Arezzo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Arezzo is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Sambenedettese · 1.34 pts / match - Arezzo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sambenedettese - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Arezzo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 66%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sambenedettese
Arezzo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).
Teams vs league
| Sambenedettese | Liga | Arezzo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.79 | 2.26 | ▲ 2.41 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 39% | 49% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 21% | 39% | ▲ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 30% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 45% | 63% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 55% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Sambenedettese 0 - 0 - 1 Arezzo. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sambenedettese vs Arezzo?
The Serie C Group B match finished Sambenedettese 0:0 Arezzo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sambenedettese vs Arezzo?
Sambenedettese score 0.76 goals per game on average and Arezzo 1.72. The Serie C Group B average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Sambenedettese's matches and 44% of Arezzo's.
What form are Sambenedettese and Arezzo in?
Over the last 5 games Sambenedettese have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Arezzo 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sambenedettese vs Arezzo?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sambenedettese vs Arezzo: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


