San Antonio vs Colorado Springs: match statistics
San Antonio vs Colorado Springs: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
San Antonio played Colorado Springs in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
San Antonio: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Colorado Springs: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
San Antonio scores 1.00 and concedes 0.63 goals per match. Colorado Springs scores 2.00 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: San Antonio 25%, Colorado Springs 83%. Over 2.5: San Antonio 25%, Colorado Springs 67%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Colorado Springs has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.36. San Antonio: 12.8 shots per match, Colorado Springs: 14.8.
Match halves
San Antonio: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.50. Colorado Springs: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.50.
Goals by minute
San Antonio: 16-30 (2 goals). Colorado Springs: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-1. Average goals 2.75, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
San Antonio are favorites for this match: they sit 3rd in the home table, while Colorado Springs are 17th in the away standings. The hosts have a clear defensive edge — conceding only 0.25 goals per home game on average and recording 75% clean sheets, whereas Colorado concedes 2.0 goals per away game on average and has no clean sheets (0%). In attack San Antonio generate more chances: home xG of 1.60 with 14.5 shots and 4.25 on target, while Colorado on the road post xG 1.25 with 12 shots and 2.33 on target, although they have a slightly higher conversion rate of 11% versus the hosts' 9%. One must, however, account for Colorado’s strong recent form over the last five matches — 11 goals scored (2.2 per game) and a record of 3 wins and 2 draws (PPG 2.2), whereas San Antonio in that period have 1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss and only 3 goals (PPG 1.2). Considering the hosts’ dominant defense (0.25 conceded per game and 75% CS) and advantage in chance creation, I forecast a San Antonio win, although Colorado’s high conversion rate and form can threaten the defensive line.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick 'yes' — I assess BTTS probability at 75% vs 25% for No Goal. San Antonio averages 2.67 scored and 1.33 conceded per match this season, while Colorado Springs averages 1.33 scored and 2.00 conceded, indicating both teams regularly score and concede. Season BTTS rate for San Antonio is 100%, for Colorado Springs 67%, and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, which strongly supports Goal/Goal. xG and offensive activity also back this scenario: the home side has xG 2.08 and averages 6.33 shots on target per match versus 2.33 on target for the visitors, and Colorado Springs has scored 11 goals in the last 5 matches (2.2 per match) with 60% BTTS in those five fixtures. The only meaningful counterargument is San Antonio's poorer form in the last 5 matches (20% BTTS and 0.6 goals on average), but the dominant season metrics (100% BTTS for the hosts, average goals conceded 1.33 and 2.00) lean towards playing BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
San Antonio averages 2.67 goals per game this season, has an xG of 2.08 and records 6.33 shots on target, while Colorado Springs posts 1.33 goals, xG 1.25 and 2.33 shots on target. Defensive xG are 0.82 (San Antonio) and 1.36 (Colorado), which when averaged gives expected goals of 1.72 for the home side and 1.03 for the visitors, totaling 2.75 xG. San Antonio has 100% of home games over 1.5 goals, Colorado 67%, and BTTS occurs in 100% and 67% of their matches respectively, which strongly supports a scenario of at least two goals. Season-long Over 2.5 is 67% for both teams, and the league records 51% of matches Over 2.5, so I rate Over 2.5 as moderately likely (~68%), whereas Over 3.5 is less certain (≈38%) given the cumulative xG of 2.75. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (pick: Over 1.5) due to high goal averages, shot dominance and San Antonio’s full percentage of home matches over that line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
San Antonio has clearly superior offensive metrics this season: 2.67 goals scored per game versus Colorado Springs’ 1.33, xG 2.08 versus 1.25, 17.67 shots per game versus 12.0 and 6.33 on target versus 2.33, indicating an advantage in chance creation. Season results show a home advantage (67% wins for San Antonio versus 0% wins for the visitors), but half-time statistics are less decisive — San Antonio led at the break in 33% of matches, were tied at the break in 33% and were trailing in 33%, while Colorado were tied at the break in 100% of their games. The second-half figures are key: San Antonio scores on average 2.0 goals after the break and averages 3.0 points in second halves with a 100% win rate in second halves, whereas Colorado only averages 0.33 points in second halves and concedes 1.67 goals on average after the break. For these reasons the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a San Antonio win at full-time (X/1) — I assign this a 34% probability; further signals are 1/1 (25%) and draw/draw (X/X 19%), arising from an even start and the home side’s second-half superiority.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| San Antonio | Colorado Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
San Antonio is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - San Antonio · 1.4 pts / match - Colorado Springs
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Colorado Springs is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - San Antonio · 2 goals / match - Colorado Springs
San Antonio is 165% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.63 goals / match - San Antonio · 1.67 goals / match - Colorado Springs
San Antonio scores in 50% of matches (4 of 8 matches), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).
Colorado Springs scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - San Antonio
Over / Under - Colorado Springs
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Antonio is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / match - San Antonio · 1.17 pts / match - Colorado Springs
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
San Antonio - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Colorado Springs - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
San Antonio
Colorado Springs
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| San Antonio | Liga | Colorado Springs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.63 | 2.67 | ▲ 3.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 53% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 53% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 63% | 29% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 65% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 81% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): San Antonio 3 - 0 - 1 Colorado Springs. Average goals 2.75, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of San Antonio vs Colorado Springs?
The USL Championship match finished San Antonio 3:3 Colorado Springs. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between San Antonio and Colorado Springs?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches San Antonio won 3, Colorado Springs won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before San Antonio vs Colorado Springs?
San Antonio score 1.00 goals per game on average and Colorado Springs 2.00. The USL Championship average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 25% of San Antonio's matches and 83% of Colorado Springs's.
What form are San Antonio and Colorado Springs in?
Over the last 5 games San Antonio have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Colorado Springs 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Antonio vs Colorado Springs?
The statistical background for San Antonio vs Colorado Springs — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.